---

Subject: Stern

Bart, you wrote:

> Parody is 100 percent legal and non-actionable, unless you can prove intent to harm.
 
> Stern wants us to believe that Leno, Dave, Jon, Conan, Kimmel, SNL etc.
> can't mention anybody by name because the party mentioned might sue?
 

I'm not a lawyer, but I think the thing that was mentioned was that it was set up in case GUESTS
on the show libelled someone. I've heard guests come on and start to rant about someone or other,
claiming they know something about someone and Stern and Robin would be shouting over him or her
not letting them say whatever it was and then you'd hear the dump button go on and he'd say "You can't say that!!!"
So to me it sounds like that kind of thing.

JLav
 

So why has Stern been trumpeting his "freedom to say anything?"
 

  Comments?

---

Subject: military budget lies

See numbers here:
http://www.heartheissues.com/clinton-military.html
 
Also, never forget that it was the neocons who wrote in those PNAC papers
that turning USA into a dominant voice is likely to be a long one in the absence
of  "some catastrophic and catalyzing event - like a new Pearl Harbor".
 
NEVER forget that.

Juha
 

  Comments?

---

---

Subject: Stern's delay button

Stern has a delay for one reason and one reason only.
He doesn't want Opie and Anthony's Wackpack calling in to bust his balls.

Limbaugh probably screens his calls less than Stern.
 Rude Rich
 

That makes more sense than Howard's fake explanation.
 

 Comments?

---

Subject: the Clintons

After the 1992 SuperBowl I was watching 60 minutes with my parents.
My father was a Nixon supporter - he was a hard sell against the Viet Nam war until my veteran brother
spoke to him.  Well he saw the light with Reagan and we were a solid Democratic family ever since.
 
We watched that 60 minutes program and none of us knew a damn thing about Bill or Hillary.
After the interview my Dad said, "I don't know about this guy, but I have to say anybody who
would marry such an intelligent woman couldn't be all bad."

I remember this so well (having had many debates withi him (was my father exercising my intelligence?)

I turned to my mother and said, "Mom, that is probably the best compliment Dad ever paid you."
 
Look, the world is filled with guys like my Dad (well, not quite like my Dad :)).
All they need is to see Hillary as their wife, sister or daughter who is just so smart and deserves
to be President and will support their interests.
 
In 1996 one of the last times my Dad ever went outside was to stake down a Clinton/Gore sign in his yard.
 
Take care Bart.  Those of us who don't write often still hold you in our hearts.  :)
Nancy
 

  Comments

---

---

Subject: Alito

Bart, in response to Sen. Hatch's comments on the filibuster, I sent him the following message:

Senator Hatch, today you said, "When you have lost, you should admit defeat and move on,
not try to gimmick the system," referring to yesterdays symbolic filibuster of Justice Alito.
I take it from this that the filibuster is "gimicking the system."

Remind me please, how you voted in 1992 on the filibuster to prevent an investigation into
presidential candidates dealing with America's enemies?  I don't have the records, but today's
statement makes it clear you must have broken with your party and voted for cloture at that time.

Russ

 
 Comments?

---

Subject:  Hillary rant #65421

Bart, Hillary needs to differentiate herself by something she DOES, not by things that have been done to her.
So far, she hasn't DONE a damn thing differently than any other senate democrat weasel.
Sorry, a president is a little too important to choose based on sympathy.

Nobody's asking you to cast a sympathy vote.
I listed some things that were done to her to explain her motivation.

In 2000, Gore couldn't be bothered to fight.
In 2004, Kerry couldn't be bothered to fight.
Hillary doesn't need motivation. She's a self-starter.
 

And again, if she has such a wide majority, why do none of her supporters ever write you?
What's your percentage of mail, for and against, and how do you reconcile that with her supposed popular advantage?
 -tom
 

Her supposed advantage?
Millions of Democrats are lying to pollsters?

As I've said again and again, the sane majority rarely write.
That's why I lost the debate that our soldiers are murdering scum just like Al Qaeda.
 

 Comments?

---

http://www.podsafeaudio.com/jamroom/bands/704/The_Be_Mine_Single.php

---

Subject: Stolen presidents

Bart, you published,

> Hard to believe that in my life I've had four presidents stolen from me.
> John Kennedy, assassinated.
> Robert Kennedy, assassinated by bullet.
> Gore, politically assassinated by the Supreme Court.
> Kerry, politically assassinated by Diebold."

Just wanted to add JFK Jr .....an almost certain future President
Lahawk
 

Dude, I can't argue with that.
Pickles would've voted for JFR Jr. and the fascist bastards knew that.
The BFEE didn't want any loose ends - so he had to go.

But that can't be right...

Evil men would not kill for unlimited money and power.
 

 Comments

---

---

Subject: BCR 87

Heard 87, but was a little banged up.
Gotta give it another listen before sending criticism.

Keep hammerin
Phil in DE
 

Dude, banged up is the best way to hear it.
It was recorded banged up.
 

  Comments?

---

---

Subject: military budget

Bart,

Clinton did not cut the military budget by 40%.
For one thing the budget is decided by Congress. The President only submits a proposal.

This is usually learned in 8th grade Civics class. Second, the biggest military budgets cuts
happened with Bush 1 in charge and Cheney  leading the way. Now this did happen with
the Dems in charge of  Congress, but even then it wasn't 40%.

Just like everything else that comes out of these moron's mouths, it's a lie.
Have a great night

Jim in Kansas
 

Jim, thanks for that.
I have a great night every night.
 

 Comments?

---

Subject: Bart, the money-loving conservative. And fuck you

Hey Bart,

Damn! You don't even have to try hard to piss people off.
I know myself how it feels when someone you know, or even a complete stranger jumps your ass
for some stupid reason, or no reason at all. I suppose people perceive things mostly from their own
perspective and are unable to look at things from different angles.

It's kind of like you are the Larry David of Internet Political Humor (not an insult).
Don't let the dumbasses of the world get to you(I don't think they do).
I say insult the hell out of me, my hide is pretty tough, so is my skull.

Later,
MikeP
 

 Comments?

---

---

Subject: Stern

Bart, I am a lawyer, and here is my unprofessional opinion.  Stern's show is not 100% parody,
nor is it entirely presented as a comic routine.  Information could be presented in the course of an interview,
or other context, wherein someone could make a potentially defamatory remark.  It makes sense to limit
your exposure to any lawsuit in that regard -- even one's that you know you could win -- to avoid the cost
of defense, the distraction to your life and the risk of exposure to judgment.

It is inaccurate to say that the law provides some up-front, guaranteed out from a defamation case
just because the host of a show announces that its all a bit.  Anyone can file a lawsuit, and Stern is
doing what you do.  He is the one who wants ultimate control over where the line is drawn on his show.

Keep swingin' Bart!
Jason
 

Jason, thanks, but I disagree.
Dave and Leno and other comics name names constantly.
How can they be immune and poor old Howard Stern be at risk?

The last SNL, they outright called Paris Hilton a slut.
How is Stern at risk when other, bigger stars work without restraint?
 

  Comments?

---

Guess who took Der Monkey to the prom?

---

Subject: dinos

I would like to thank the so called "Democratic Party" for putting to rest forever the myth of
a two party system in America today. The Republicans have the money, the press, and the voting machines,
but they don't need them. Our Government has been sold to the highest bidder and works against the welfare
of the people it supposedly "represents" on a daily basis with nothing more than a meek, pathetic squeak of
protest from the Democrats.

The Democrats managed a meak, pathetic squeak of protest?
That'll be the day...
 

When the shit hits the fan and America turns into a multiplication of  "The grapes of wrath" times "Mad Max"
don't blame the people who sold our future to turn a profit, history has shown that is only human nature.
Blame the smiling liars who tell you they abhor the beast as they skulk off to suck on it's tit.

Bunde the cynic
 

  Comments?

---

Subject: we need a wartime consiglieri

BC, it is almost irrelevant who the Dem nominee is for President is.  If the Dems fail
to learn from their chronic mistakes of the past, America gets stuck with another Repug.

Diebold being Mistake "A?"
If we don't fix that, we're screwed.
Hillary doesn't have a chance if the vote doesn't have a paper trail.
 

Off the top of my head:

1.  Bob Shrum worked on 8 Dem Presidential campaings and won zero.
     Don't hire him or any of his associates.

2.  Donna Brazile has worked on 9 Presidential campaigns, and 3 times won.
     That's not good enough.  Don't hire her or any of her associates.

3.  There is no vacation time between the Dem convention and the election.

Calling Senator Kerry!
What an idiot he was to go wind-surfing during America's crucial fulcrum.
while Bush and his Swiftboat pals were trashing him to the Nth degree.

How stupid can Kerry be?
*I* could have won this for him, but he didn't want to win.
 

4.  Any and all Dem backstabbers will be cut off from party funds, period.

Christ, can we make that a Commandment?
What's the quickest way to lose LIEberman?
 

5.  Any Dem who ran in the primaries and is not running for re-election must
     actually campaign for the candidate, while also serving as Rep, Sen., or whatever.

6.  No concurrent candidacies  (Lieberman running for Senate in CT in 2000).
     100% focus on winnning the WH, period.

Lieberman had no intention of winning.
His, "Aw shucks" debate with Cheney proved that.
 

7.  No petty power plays among staff.

8.  The campaign must wisely spent all of it's funds.
     No more of Kerry holding on to milliions, only to lose.

That's so fucking obvious.
Kerry lost a squeaker with what, $16M unspent?
John, how could you betray your party and your country so conspicuously?
Christ on  bartcopcom  if I make a mistake, dozens of people let me know about it.
How did Kerry get away with trying to win cheap, when his wife own f-ing ketchup?
 

9.  Any candidate relying on a "lucky bowl of clam chowder on Election Day"
     or whatever to win will have it extracted by ER professionals.

I don't get that one.
 

10.  Expect Repug smears, and relentlessly counterattack, every time.

This is where they need  bartcop.com
The Demo wimps buy every lie they're told by the BFEE.
(Mena Airport, Hillary's murder victims, etc.)

The Democrats might be powerless to win elections without Ol' Bart.
I know that sounds crazy and self-aggrandizing (did I spell that right?)
but considering the job the hopeless Demo-thinkers have done the last 3 elections,
is there any doubt that I couldn't contribute something?
 

11.  Force the election into the open.  All Dems hound the Repugs when they resist.
 Is this too much to ask for?

Yes, because the Democrats have no balls.
They'd rather die as losers, than die as fighters with courage.

Me, I'll die fighting.
 

  Comments?

---

 

 back to  bartcop.com