From: young@erim-int.com
Subject: Oh, the shame of it
BartCop,
Unfortunately, I am fated to drive places three
times a week at noon
(EST) so I suffer through three days of
PigBoy. Today he said that
James Carville had turned on his Master.
Is that true? I thought
Carville would buy the KY and happily take it
like a man, while being
smacked around by his bony wife, before he'd
turn.
Say it ain't so, BartCop. Say it ain't so...
Peter
Peter, relax, Rush is lying again.
If Carville skips Russert's show for a week, Rush claims he's "too
ashamed" to go on.
Since Pat Caddell (Foprmer D, Present traitor) is on every Fox Show
every night,
and Chris the Screamer's show every night, and Heraldo every night,
Pigboy thinks
Carville being on less-often is "proof" that Clinton is a bad man.
Truth is, they invite Caddell on so they can run the "Democrat" label
while that shit Caddell spews his hatred every night.
From: RITAW@pro-west.org
Subject: 12-point type
I would like to refute the statement that "most liberals who read you are getting older."
That is an inaccurate statement about what segment
of the population constitutes liberals.
But make it bigger if you want to.
Rita Weinstein
Seattle, WA
Rita,
Many people have written to remind me that the older people already
have their fonts set.
We'll stay with the 12-point font until I'm too old to read it.
From: Hactor@aol.com
Subject: National Review's "Kill Chelsea" column - Change names & wait
Sun., 2/25/01, not one word on "Meat The Press",
"Ham and Cocky", or
"The McAwful Grope" about the "Chelsea death
column" - and the asshole from
National Review was on the McAwful show.
.......I have and idea......
YOU publish the same story, but substitute Jenna
Bush's name for Chelsea.
Then let's see who get visited by the
Secret Service.
(I would, but, you know, I can't go to jail right now).
Keep up the good and necessary work. Keep on pushin'.
Hactor
Hactor, excellent point.
I'm not going to try it...
From: WilliamL15@prodigy.net
Subject: News Flash: Repukes
threaten building with arrest
Swear to Koresh, I'm not making this up.
First an idiotic repuke, Arlan Specter (R-Poltergeist)
wants to "impeach" private citizen Bill Clinton.
Now Dan Burton (R-Moron) wants to issue a contempt
citation against the Clinton library,
if it refuses to give up all the names of its
sponsors.
It seems Dan desperately needs all the names of
donors, their family
members, neighbors, and anyone remotely connected
with any of them, in
order to expand his ever widening witch hunt
against former President Clinton.
Still unanswered are such mind-boggling questions as:
1. How will they get handcuffs large enough to go around a building?
2. Does the building have the right to make one phone call to its lawyer?
3. How will they get a squad car big enough to
transport the building
to police headquarters?
4. Will President-select smirk do the right thing and pardon the building to end this madness?
5. Will someone please do the right thing and
have every repuke
committed to an insane
asylum for shock therapy before it's too late?
Bill L.
From: kuras@myway.com
Subject: Right wing radio pundits
I was listening to G. Gordon Liddy on 2/23/01
and he reads a letter
from a listener who says G. is morally bankrupt
because he was convicted of
burglary when he was caught breaking into the
DNC HQ at Watergate.
G. responds that he committed no crime and then
he quotes Voltaire or
somebody who said "In times of war, there are
no crimes."
G. says he was at war at the time; he was at
war with the left wing.
How's that for fascist b.s.? We have to
get these right wing idiots
off the air; please write to the radio station
that is airing them and tell
them what you think about them.
Andrew K
Andrew, what else can he say?
He has six or seven felony convictions.
He can't say, "I'm above the law," because that's what he accuses Clinton
of saying,
so he does what the press and the rest of the GOP does - he makes shit
up.
From: young@erim-int.com
Subject: Wellll!?!?!
BartCop,
Your correspondent bluelens@hotmail.com said some pretty hard things, among which was:
Are we going to see nothing but hearings on every
one of Clinton's decisions for the past 8 years?
Has that become the new job and purpose in congress?
Is this what my tax dollars are paying for?
NO ONE can tell me that this is for the good
of the country... or that this is what the majority wants.
Remember that the majority of the American people
didn't vote for the
current numb-nuts in the white house.
And it made me realize that that is the point.
The Resident Select has no legitimacy but the press
is determined to convert residual Democratic
loyalty to support for His Smirkness.
Why, BartCop?
Why?
Why haven't we heard from the Florida recounters?
Why hasn't anyone called for hearings into Submarinegate
or EminentDomainGate or
SECFilingsGate or any other gates that may or
may not have opened under the Smirk watch?
Do you ever feel like you're the last sane person
left?
And if you're the only non-whack in the joint,
does that mean you're not?
Is sanity determined by the majority?
I'm gonna go home and drink a big bottle of dark beer.
Peter
Peter, remember two things:
First, read this.
Second, Rupert Murdoch, Richard Mellon Scaife and Sung Yung
Moon run the Republican Party.
They've given uncounted millions to the Bush family, and they own half
the American media.
If Rupert or the Moonies don't like a story, it won't be in the Washington
Times or
the New York Post or the Daily Oklahoman or Fox News etc etc etc.
On the other hand, if they get wood for a story about a White House
intern, they can rev up their
networks and newspapers and satellites and cable stations and run with
it 24/7/52/forever,
as we're seeing with the pardon "scandal."
You know, the whore press is so lucky this happened.
If Clinton had said "no," to every pardon, once the lies about the
vandalism in Air Force One
and the Whgite House were proven false, all they'd have would be the
DC licence-plate "scandal."
They need to fabricate 168 hours of horseshit
every week or ...go off the air.
Since Smirky is "untouchable," they do what all writers do when they
have nothing:
You raid the classics.
And what news could be more "classic" than Clinton's cock?
From: jbertrant7@home.com
Subject: A couple more
Dear Bartcop,
As a Canadian, I feel a little out of place commenting
on American affairs.
However, living in a border city (Windsor) I'm
probably more de facto
American than most real Yanks. I just wanted
to say:
1) LOVE your site! It's my favourite political info source of all time,
2) On your list of 'Uncle Toms', there
are a couple more that you should mention; namely
Thomas Sowell and DeRoy Murdock. Their
columns appear in our local right-wing rag, The Windsor Star
(my thoughts on the content of that paper would
require a whole other e-mail which I'll send you sometime).
While I'm not comfortable with the notion that
black people should be in lock-step with any particular
ideology, these two, especially Sowell, are just
as bad as that fat puke Limbaugh. I'm sure you're familiar
with them and that your list wasn't meant to
be all-inclusive, but PLEASE add and print your comments on
them --they make this Canadian boy glad he's
on this side of the border.
I wonder if Sowell has ever had a chuckle about
his very appropriate first name!
All the Best,
J. Bertrand
J,
I don't recognize DeRoy Murdock, (I'll bet a coupla clicks would fill
me in,)
He's new to me, but you're right about that prick Sowell.
Sowell is such a traitor, when he writes a column, he doesn't just express
an opinion.
No, Massa gets more from Uncle Tommy Sowell.
Let's say Sowell is writing a story about the New York cab's trouble
with black men.
Sowell will swear he's never had a cab pass him by, which is
a lie right there, but he'll go
on and on with how personally outraged he is that "troublemakers"
like Jesse Jackson
or Al Sharpton are always "creating a crisis when there isn't one"
to prove they're still needed.
Thomas Sowell and Clarence Thomas and Wayne Willams and the others get
to say,
"I'm black, and I worked hard and made it,
so if you can't do what I did, I'm better than you,"
and get invited to whitey's private cocktail parties. And if "the hood,"
can't understand his
obvious greatness and supriority, it just proves how uneducated "those
people" are.
Hey, ...if Sowell wants to play whitey, ...this is America.
He can do whatever the fuck he wants.
But when he lies about the black man having TOO MANY advantages,
he's just being a whore for the sake of being a whore.
He needs to be reminded.
From: jaburto@ucsd.edu
Subject: Bill Clinton
I just read your 2/23 issue. Damn straight!!!
I believe in Bill Clinton and I am willing to
defend him to the bitter end.
If Clinton was such a terrible President, then
wouldn't he have skipped town
and embezzled millions of dollars, or accept
a $2 million dollar house
(like that joke of a puppet of a president,
Regan)?
Oh, I forgot, Republicans consider taking presents
as "embezzling."
Well, I can't wait for Gore to come in 2004 and
then see all the shit
that ass Shrub takes out of the White House.
Long live the Democrats!!!
The jack-ass can kick the elephant's fat ass any
day!!!
Sincerely,
James
From: dbaker41@fuse.net
Subject: Pardons
BC:
I'm pretty sick of everybody turning on Clinton
for the pardons -- even
the Rich pardon and the Hugh Rodham crap (not
that I have any particular
regard for Hugh Rodham). First, who really
"deserves" a pardon anyway??
Did Cappy Weinberger "deserve" a pardon?
Does Mike Milken "deserve" a pardon?
Nobody DESERVES a pardon unless they've done
every minute of their prison term -- then they don't NEED one!
"Rule of Law" and all that.
It's an absolute presidential power, Bill should
just say "Screw You" to all the critics.
Second, Hugh Rodham got paid for representing
a client.
Did the taxpayers pay his fee? I don't
THINK so! Did he do anything wrong?
I can't see that he did. Bill and Hillary
should have just said, "Yeah,
Hugh was the guy's lawyer -- NOTHING WRONG WITH
THAT! SO FUCK OFF!"
Bake,
Saturday, Susan McDougal said is costs
$40,000 just to have a lawyer draw up pardon papers.
And other legal work or investigations
ot depositions are extra, but the whore press printed the line
the Republicans fed them, that "Clinton
sold pardons and everyone knows it."
We ought to be more concerned about the Big Dick Cheney - Halliburton revolving door!
Or the Ted Olsen clients. In the end, who cares???
Bake
Another good point.
Funny how Ted Olsen can work for Paula Jones, Ken Starr AND the Bush
family
will Smirky and the whore press tell us about the "new tone" in Washington.
They are incestuous viper whores.
From: jkclaus@earthlink.net
NewsFlash: Democrat with Cojones
Last night one of the local news twits here in
Albany, NY was interviewing
Rep. Mike McNulty at a rally for the local homeless
population. In what I'm sure she
thought was a flash of inspiration, she asked
about the latest "Clinton Pardon Scandal."
The good Congressman (see, that phrase isn't
always an oxymoron) got a bit angry,
and said that if the Republoweasels want to keep
this up, then maybe he'd make
some inquiries into pardons made by Bush I and
Ronald Reagan.
Hmm... let's see. I'm no lawyer, but since Cap
Weinberger's been pardoned,
I don't think he can invoke the 5th Amendment
if called on to testify.
That ought to make for some good television.
Jeffrey
Jeffrey,
The Democrats are waiting until Weinberger gets too old to testify.
You see, they don't want to rock the boat - because Smirk is such a
nice guy,
giving them all nicknames and inviting them, over to the White House
to see a movie..
