Many Democrats still don’t grasp what they’re
up against in today’s Republican Party.
Naïve souls, they prefer to see national
politics as a giant PTA meeting, and to comfort
themselves with civics text bromides about the
virtues of compromise and bipartisanship.
Even in the face of the Clinton impeachment and
the naked power play that decided the
2000 presidential election, they have trouble
comprehending the sheer ruthlessness of the
GOP political juggernaut. This is nothing new.
Even during FDR’s presidency, Will Rogers
joked that he belonged to no organized political
party: He was a Democrat. Today, however,
the party simply must learn to effectively counter
the well-organized army of think-tank,
opinion page and cable TV propagandists who parrot
the GOP party line, no matter how
illogical or preposterous.
In effect, organizations like FOX News, The Washington
Times, The Wall Street Journal
editorial page, Rush Limbaugh and right-wing
talk radio are simply adjuncts of the Republican
Party. To this add scores of Washington pundits
often employed by tycoon-financed "think
tanks" such as the American Heritage Institute,
Cato Foundation, etc. For all the braying
about "liberal media bias," which may be the
most successful GOP "spin point," Democrats
simply have no equivalent propaganda machine.
Unlike Democrats, typically all over the place,
Republican-oriented pundits agree almost
all the time—and not just substantively, but
tactically, too. Faxes and e-mails go out from the
Republican National Committee, and GOP sophists
jump into line like the Rockettes.
According to David Brock, the onetime Republican
"hit man" whose book, "The Republican
Noise Machine," explains exactly how the system
works, the White House’s "explicit goal is
to get us to the point where there are blue [state]
facts and red [state] facts."
Judging by my e-mail, it’s working. Hardly a day
passes that I don’t hear from perfectly decent,
intelligent citizens who believe that there’s
proof Saddam’s WMD were smuggled into Syria or
that documents implicating him in 9/11 have been
found. This was Orwell’s great fear: that the
very concept of objectivity would disappear from
political discourse. "Collective solipsism,"
he called it; the ability to convince people
that 2 + 2 = 5.
A few recent examples:
George W. Bush nominates a black woman as secretary
of state, and pundits who have spent
their careers decrying "political correctness"
argue as one that Democrats opposing her must
be hypocritical bigots.
He nominates for attorney general a guy who rationalized
torture, and that man’s ethnicity, too,
becomes his only necessary credential. Only after
Alberto Gonzales is confirmed by the Senate
do some GOP pundits rediscover their consciences.
A former male escort infiltrates the White House
press corps via the buddy system, and the very
pundits who just months ago warned that Democrats
would enshrine the "homosexual agenda"
go silent. Or they pretend not to understand
the difference between a gay reporter and a gay
prostitute. No fatwa issues from radical clerics
like Jerry Falwell or Pat Robertson; James Dobson
keeps railing about the imagined sexual proclivities
of a cartoon sponge.
What do such examples tell us? First, that neither
the Bush White House nor most GOP pundits
actually give a flying filigree about "political
correctness," " family values, "" moral clarity" or any
of it. What counts is winning. What counts is
power.
One more example: Last week, I wrote that Howard
Dean, recently elected chair of the Democratic
National Committee, appears capable of giving
his party a wake-up call because he’s scrappy, smart
and fearless. Hence, the GOP party line on Dean
is that he’s a snobbish elitist and an advocate of
cultural decadence. Also crazy, because, as we
all know, anybody who sees through Bush must be
consumed by anger and hatred.
A GOP columnist for the Arkansas Democrat-Gazette
took offense. On cue, he described Dean
supporters as "shrill," " radical-left" "wacko,"
etc. "[W] hen Dean bemoans the success of Republican
appeals on ‘ God, guns and gays, ’" the fellow
chided, "he forgets that most Americans still believe
in God, don’t want gay marriage and do want to
keep their guns." Now anybody dumb enough to
think Dean (or any American politician) has declared
himself anti-God quit reading long ago. But it’s
a fact that Dean was the only Democratic presidential
candidate in 2004 to get an A rating from the
National Rifle Association. He jokes that Vermont
has only two gun laws: You can’t take a gun to
school, and you can’t carry a loaded gun in a
car because it’s unfair to deer. As Vermont governor,
Dean opposed gay marriage. "Marriage is between
a man and a woman," he said. "... Most Americans
aren’t going to support gay marriage, but most
Americans will support equal rights." Know what?
I’d wager that my antagonist, a college professor,
knew all that. (I’d also entertain a side bet that this
particular left-wing elitist owns more firearms
than he does.) But in the fashion of Republican pundits
everywhere, he played his audience for suckers.
Free-lance columnist Gene Lyons is a Little Rock
author and recipient of
the National Magazine Award.
Back to bartcop.com