For a period in the early 1990s in Russia (another
country claiming to have
organized flights to the Moon), the Moon hoax theory was openly discussed
in mass media. But, some time later, the discussions on this subject ended.
Why?
Perhaps because the Russian Airspace agency began collaboration with NASA
and the rules of diplomacy required silencing this subject.
This was the preface, and the main story is ahead.
I here affirm that so-called flights to the Moon, by both Americans and
Russians,
were just a hoax (and that flights to the Moon, Mars and other planets
are impossible
with the technology level reached today). Here is why:
Gravitation and time are linked, and time depends on gravitation: the more
gravitation,
the "faster" time, and vice versa. For example, on the Sun, where gravitation
is greater
than on the Earth, time "flows" about 30 times faster, while on Mars and
on the Moon,
vice versa, much slower. This means life processes are slower on the Moon
and Mars,
which is deadly for Earth organisms.
But this is not the main reason why the flights to the Moon and to Mars,
with the use of,
are impossible. The combined gravitation is more or less appropriate for
the life processes
only within 1,000 kilometers from Earth. At longer distances, the gravitation
decreases,
the time flows much more slowly, and life processes, correspondingly, slow
down.
At the distance of 100,000 kilometers from the Earth, time flow will be
so slow that life
processes will almost stop. The Moon is about 384,000 kilometers far from
the Earth and
Mars is tens of millions kilometers distant (the flight to the Moon, with
today's slow
chemicals-based engines, would require several days, and the flight to
Mars about one year).
The combined gravitation is very small at such distances, and time almost
doesn't "flow" there,
thus not allowing normal life processes. To fly to such distances, an antigravitation
craft
would be needed, with the special equipment that produces gravitation.
Other indications that the US and Soviet Moon flights were hoaxed:
1) After the "lunar module" landed, astronaut Armstrong stepped out of
it, and his boot's
sole left the "footprint" near the module. The photograph of this footprint
was circulated
worldwide. But footprints can only form on ground when water is present.
Without it, sand
particles just cannot "glue" together to form footprints. But there is
no water on the Moon,
moreover near the overheated nozzle of an engine, which has just stopped
functioning
(after landing).
2) According to "Moon videos", slow walking of American astronauts on the
Moon almost
doesn't differ from walking on the Earth. But lunar gravity is 6 times
less than that of the Earth.
This means that the astronauts would have to literally leap with every
step on the Moon.
3) The strange 1972 agreement between the United States and Soviet Union
about wheat
supplies to the Soviet Union -- at prices twice lower than market prices,
during 20 years.
Why? Perhaps this was done in order that the Soviets wouldn't show the
world that US
Moon flights were hoaxed. (And so the Soviets could fake their own "Moon
flights" to imply
they had space capacities comparable to those of the U.S., without the
fear of being
unmasked, in turn, by the US).
Here I have to say that the Soviets made a stupid, for themselves, mistake
when they
agreed to this. In the 1960s, the Soviets excelled the U.S. in space, and
NASA had to
invent "Moon flights" to get more Congressional money for financing NASA
projects.
Yes, the Soviets got cheaper wheat, and faked their own "Moon flights".
But perhaps
it would have been better for the Soviets not to get the cheap wheat, not
to invent a
similar success story about the flights to the Moon, but just to unmask
NASA's Moon
hoax to deprive it of a good part of Congressional money. Why couldn't
the Soviet Union
buy cheap wheat from say India or South America, and yet cheaper rice from
China?
Rice and rice bread are not worse than wheat.
Let us consider this just a next Soviet stupidity, like say the ignoring
of German offensive
in 1941 (the plan Barbarossa, which, among other consequences, resulted
in the loss,
by the Soviets, of their nuclear laboratories located in Ukraine), the
loss in 6 Day War
in 1967 (Israel supported by the US against Arab countries supported by
the Soviet
Union), the war in Afghanistan, which lead to the collapse of the Soviet
Union, the
support provided by the Soviet Union to Vietnam when China attacked it
in 1979,
and many other similar actions. "Soviet wisemen" were unable to understand
why
China needed to attack Vietnam: to show the West that China, where at that
time
reforms had begun, had common enemy with it, namely the Communist Soviet
Union,
the other superpower of those times; and to begin collaboration with the
West.
If you would like to discuss Der Voron's theories,
he can be reached at der-voron@linkeseite.zzn.com