Shocking Arrogance
   by Jeff Crook

 Can you believe what has happened in Iraq in the last few days? It's as if the
 administration's entire war strategy was based on the assumption that no one
 would dare resist. I can't believe some of the crap I heard on television over
 the weekend. I can't believe how ignorant some of the military planners are.

 Iraqi soldiers pretending to surrender then attacking? This isn't meant to fool
 the Americans, it is meant to make it impossible for any Iraqi's to surrender.
 Now, American soldiers won't honor a flag of truce. Iraqi soldiers dressing
 in civilian clothes? This isn't meant to fool the Americans, it is meant to make
 all Iraqi civilians a target, thus forcing them to defend themselves from us.
 Now no Iraqi, not a surrendering soldier and not an innocent civilian is safe.
 And yet no one on TV can figure this out.

 On several occasions, TV people referred to attacks behind our lines as
 terrorist attacks. The grenade attack in Kuwait, for example, before we
 found out what really happened. Are we not at war? Haven't we said we
 are at war? Combatants in a war aren't terrorists. Combatants engaged in
 sabotage and ambush behind enemey lines have a name - special forces.
 We don't call our Navy Seals and Green Berets terrorists, now do we?
 And if, God forbid, something should happen here, it won't be an act of
 terrorism, because we are at war and thus we are all legitimate targets,
 according to the Bush administration's Shock and Awe idea of legitimate
 targets in Bagdad.

 Then there were the videos of dead and captured American soldiers.
 According to Bush, this is a violation of the Geneva Convention. It's about
 damn time he learned about the Geneva Convention, because he has
 certainly made a point of ignoring it when it comes to the prisoners in Cuba.
 Iraq showed video of captured soldiers being questioned. Didn't we show
 video and photos of Guantanamo prisoners on their knees? Wasn't there a
 photo of John Walker Lindh naked and wrapped in duct tape?

 And when the Northern Alliance swept through Afganistan, didn't we see
 videos of dead Taliban soldiers lying in ditches? Didn't we see videos of
 foreign nationals fighting on the Taliban's side being beaten and chased by
 mobs of Northern Alliance soldiers? I distinctly remember two instances
 - one of what I believe was a Pakistani being beaten, and another begging
 for his life with blood streaming down his face.

 Weren't these also violations of the Geneva Convention?

 Or is it only a violation when it is American soldiers?
 
 Bush isn't angry about any violation of the Geneva Convention. He is angry
 because this can no longer be seen by the American public as a bloodless,
 sanitary war, the only kind we can tolerate.

 The administration and its apologists said that it was too late to back out before
 the war, that we had to go to war or lose face. How much harder is it now?

 This is Bush's Crusade. Previous Crusades failed because they were largely
 led by arrogant and incompetent leaders.
 
 

 Jeff Crook


  back to  bartcop.com
 
 
 
 

Privacy Policy
. .