Saint Matthew wrote that in the Sermon on the Mount, Christ spoke these
words:
"Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth."
If that, in fact, turns out to be the case, then one day soon the sedated and submissive Senate Democrats will be land barons.
It is true that you could find more smiling faces in Dr. Kevorkian's
van than in the Senate Democratic Caucus.
The lamblike silence of their party leaders leaves rank-and-file Democrats
feeling abandoned and betrayed.
Democratic foot soldiers see a President Bush who is clearly vulnerable
politically on his Pontius Pilate
disengagement from the simmering conditions in the Middle East that
led to the deadly Israeli-Palestinian crisis,
on Social Security, on the environment, for an obvious tilt to the
rich and powerful on taxes and government
policy, and on health care -- particularly the runaway cost of prescription
drugs for seniors.
Whether it is out of fear of being branded "soft" on terrorism or simple
political paralysis at the sight of the
president's sky-high favorable poll numbers, too many Washington Democrats
are too scared to question
-- let alone to criticize -- the Bush administration's very questionable
policies.
Credit must go to Rep. Jim Moran, D-Va., who has bluntly framed the
choice for his fellow elected Democrats:
"We, the most prosperous generation in the most prosperous nation in
human history, must decide whether we
will fund our own retirement or whether we stick our kids and grandchildren
with the bill for this (Bush) tax cut."
Elected Democrats apparently stop reading the polls right after they
see Bush's favorable job rating, which is
indeed favorable. Because if they continued to read, they would encounter
abundant evidence that voters, when
asked to decide between covering prescription drugs for seniors or
repealing the scheduled Bush tax cuts,
choose -- by margins of 2-to-1 -- the prescription drug benefit over
tax cuts.
But Democrats cannot begin to fight credibly for prescription drugs
when they cannot muster the will -- in a time of war
-- to suspend the future Bush tax cuts. It's sad that Capitol Hill
Democrats lack the courage of the voters' convictions.
This president and the White House are seen by voters as squarely on
the side of the wealthy. The White House
makes no attempt to conceal its commitment -- by lightening the tax
load of those in the highest income brackets
-- of closing the dangerously wide gap between the rich and the super
rich. To cover the costs of his tax cuts,
the president has been forced to raid the Social Security trust fund
just to pay the government's bills.
Simultaneously, congressional Republicans, in reaction to Bush's own
signature initiative -- the partial privatization
of Social Security -- have run away from that controversial idea faster
than a vampire from a crucifix or a National
Organization of Women delegation from free drinks at Hooters.
Congressional Republicans do not want to explain in an Enron/Arthur
Andersen election year -- when voters,
according to Republican pollster Bill McInturff, hold more positive
feelings toward both Congress and labor unions
than they do toward big corporations -- how the $1 trillion needed
to cover the transition costs to the Bush
privatization is now long gone because of the earlier Bush tax cut.
Yes, the president does have a high favorable rating. But he has been
the beneficiary of, rather than the prime mover
responsible for, this historic surge of national unity. There are today
included in that favorable Bush job rating a lot of
Democratic voters who admired Bush's post-Sept. 11 performance but
who will, in all likelihood, pull the Democratic
lever in November. The Bush commander in chief credential is not transferable
to GOP congressional candidates.
But until a timid Democratic leadership shows the courage to question
and to criticize the shortcomings and the
injustices of the Bush policies, the nation will be without the healthy
public debate we need.
There must be some Democrat with the courage to say publicly that the
emperor is wearing a Speedo