I agree it not so much who they talk to as what they say. What I
hear when I listen is that it's is OK to harass and investigate a Democrat
(in fact our current mess is apparently his fault as well??? go figure!),
even spending millions of taxpayer dollars to do so but to question our
current Republican admin. is unpatriotic.

        What is more important to you.  Clintons involvement in a small, probably
shady real-estate deal, that lost him money or whether Bush stole the national election?

        What is more important to you.  Some possible cronyism in a small government
office (who every heard of the travel office? and who every heard of cronyism in politics?
I'm sure that's never happened before...) or the extremely likely possibility that our current
administration allowed the energy companies to dictate our national energy policy?

        What is more important to you.  The possibility that the President had sex with an
intern or the possibility that the President, with more than enough very credible intelligence
that we were in for an attack chose to do nothing to protect the people he has sworn to
protect (were his fingers crossed behind his back during the swearing in?).

        In all of those examples Clinton was investigated to the fullest extent by the independent
counsell.  In all of those examples Bush' White House either tells us it is unpatriotic to question
the government in times of war (btw, I don't remember Congress declaring war.  Isn't that how
it is supposed to work?) or we are told that an independent council is not necessary.
Don't worry, they will investigate themselves.

        On some level all of those issues are important, but what are our priorities?
Which of those issues above could effect you and all Americans most?
 
DJA