Of course "hate" is too strong a word. You should not hate anyone. Especially
not jittery
world leaders who are striving to justify war and make it look all fierce
and necessary.
Look, there they are, trying so hard. Especially Bush. Look at that earnest,
constipated,
caught-in-the-headlights statement. Trying trying trying. Please do not
hate him.
GW Bush's image is extremely carefully managed, probably more intensely
than any
president in recent history. He gives almost zero unscripted talks, expresses
minimal
extemporaneous thoughts, still mispronounces "nukuler" even when reading
from a teleprompter.
He is protected from difficult questions, schooled in basic sentence structure,
makes sudden
political maneuvers to deflect increasingly troubling accusations that
his administration had
plenty of advance warning of 9/11 and did little to prevent it. And please
do not mention his
major ties to Enron at this time. Thank you.
Bush has undoubtedly been told to try and look less scared and squinty
on camera. He makes
cute self-deprecating jokes about his horrible command of the English language.
Rumor also has it that during a meeting with Brazil's President Cardoso,
Bush allegedly
interrupted to ask, "Do you have blacks, too?" Condi Rice, ever the
trouper, visibly cringed
before quickly informing Dubya that Brazil is indeed home to more blacks
than any country
outside Africa. White House Press corps coverage? None. Just too embarrassing.
This is
the leader of the free world. Are you sure you want to know this sort of
thing?
Besides, Dubya has proven again and again and you read it just about everywhere
and the man
has it tattooed on his thigh and it veritably oozes from the pores of his
happily myopic followers,
he is indeed a Very Nice Man with a Very Swell Disposition and Good Christian
Manners and
gosh darn it, people like him so please quit being so mean.
Ashcroft has scowled about it and Rumsfeld has squinted angrily about it
and Cheney has shown
twitching signs of life about it and it's been made
very clear again and again: You are not allowed
to openly abhor the president or his decisions
because doing so clearly indicates traitorous
inclinations and this is wartime which is a Very
Difficult Time for Us All.
If you insist on calling it wartime, that is. Which of
course it's not, given how we've killed untold
thousands of barely armed Taliban and untold
numbers of innocent Afghan civilians and over a
dozen of our own soldiers and even some
Canadian troops (whoops) and we have suffered
exactly two combat casualties. This is not a war.
But you can't really say that either.
So let's just go with it, the common wisdom: It is
unpatriotic to criticize the president and we need
to rally and be strong now, united we stand,
especially in our collective misunderstanding of
foreign policy and oil stratagems and the deeper
root causes of 9/11.
Or rather, you can criticize if you like, but Bush's
image is now being so carefully controlled you
feel a little ashamed and slightly guilty doing so,
like that feeling you'd get if you teased, say, a
quadriplegic. Or a child. And this is exactly how
they want you to feel.
It is a bizarre duality, a cleverly wrought irony:
Bush is spun so he appears rather plain and
simpleminded and not really mentally agile
enough to be openly complicit in the
coverup-related decisions he's being accused
of, a feeling that, aww shucks, he's still just a
good ol' daddy's boy from the oilier parts of
Texas who don't know no better and how dare
you accuse this Very Nice Man of leveraging the
horror of 9/11 for political gain. Besides, that's
Cheney's job.
Yet you can't believe Bush is truly a man of
nuanced intelligence because that implies that
he probably did know something about the
possibility of a terrorist attack and how it could
fortify his political career, but you can't call him
flagrantly stupid because that's unpatriotic and
un-American and embarrassing, and hence
you're just left with this feeling of unease and
vague despondency about the nation's overall
direction and whatever happened to your civil
liberties.
And then there are people like Lt. Col. Steve
Butler of the Air Force who openly bashed the
president in print, called him a fool who let 9/11
happen to boost his stagnant presidency and
that's very bad indeed, can't be slamming the
commander-in-chief when you're in the military,
understandably, but it certainly does get you
thinking, maybe Bush really is dumb as a post --
but in a rather sharp, deeply sinister way.
Better take the Dan Rather approach. There he
was, America's anchorman, with the odious Larry
King, responding to a phone-in question asking
how he, Rather, would advise the president
about possibly invading Iraq and Rather
replying, well caller, I'd probably say, Mr.
President, whatever decision you make in this
very difficult matter I will support it because
you're the president and I'm a patriot and that's
that, and he said it with a straight melodramatic
face you immediately wanted to slap.
And there it is. Ignorance is bliss. Ignorance is
patriotism. We don't want to believe the Bush
administration could've done something to
prevent the horrors of 9/11, can't imagine Bush
would use the tragedy to bolster his re-election
hopes while simultaneously pummeling
Afghanistan into docility in the name of oil
pipelines and his friends in the military-industrial
complex. Increasing piles of evidence be
damned. It's just too painful.
So then, please do not openly hate Mr. Bush or
call him names or believe his decisions are all
too often terribly detrimental to the progress of
the human animal. He is too nice. He is too
dumb. He is too nicely dumb, in a really smart
way. Clever, isn't it? Aww, shucks.