Clinton
rages at BBC for badgering him over Monica
Big Dog ain't in the mood to take crap
off of anybody
Excerpt:
Clinton lost his temper when dentinless
brit-monkeys repeatedly badgered him about the
regret he was voicing over his affair with
Monica. Clinton, revving up a publicity campaign
ahead of the release Tuesday of his memoirs,
bristled at relentless questioning about the affair
by veteran BBC interviewer David Dimbleby,
according to British newspapers.
The Times said Monday that Clinton, known
for being media savvy and cheerful in public,
let out a rant that lasted several minutes.
"As outbursts go, it is not just some flash that
is over in an instant. It is something substantial
and sustained," said a BBC executive who
viewed the interview, according to the Sunday Telegraph.
They said Clinton then branched out into
an attack on media intrusion into the private lives of public figures.
Britain's public broadcaster will air the
Clinton interview Tuesday, in step with the release of his memoirs.
Go Big Dog!!
I want a copy of that!
I've always wanted to see him lose his
temper!
Update
I saw the video of Clinton "losing his temper" with the BBC.
Trust me, it's a yawnfest.
I would love to see Clinton lose him temper for real, but
this isn't it.
He barely raised his voice, and he spoke a little fast, but that's
all the fireworks there were.
Once again, the whore press screams "Wolf!" when there is none.
Subject: BCR Show 43 feedback
Always whining about feedback, sheesh.
Okay... so you can at least say you got
one.
I see it as "urging" more than "whining."
GOOD:
I think your delivery is much more polished.
I'm much impressed at the improvement
between whatever first show I commented
about the delivery and what you're doing now.
I think you're much more comfortable in
front of a microphone now too.
The "live" (well, minimal editing) stuff
is good training, particularly if you
want to end up doing a real live show someday.
Thanks.
I'd have to be a super-monkey to not get better as I got more
experience
You didn't mention my singing under "good?"
ha ha
BAD:
It seemed to me the audio levels were a
bit more off than usual. Your voice was one level,
but an ad or music might be a lot louder,
or in once instance, a lot softer.
Explanation:
The show is done in bits and pieces over the week.
If I do a bit late at nice, I speak softer so as not to wake
Mrs. Bart.
But you're right - I'll pay more attention to the levels.
A lot of ranting, much of it good, some
a bit overdone in places (I forget all the topics,
so don't ask me which), but what I would
have liked is to have Tommy insert a little
bridge music in-between some - there's
some long stretches of you talking without a break,
even a four-second bridge every few minutes
would lighten the load.
That's a good suggestion.
Truth is, I've been sending the files to Tommy in larger, pre-packaged
bundles
which cuts a full day off of the publishing schedule.
- It's COO-day-GRAW, not COUP-day-GRAW.
You got the "graw" part right - most people
do "COUP DE GRACE" like it's spelled,
but if you can excel and get the graw part
you shouldn't blow it on the "coup". :)
ha ha
That's how they say it in Oklahoma - are you sure?
That's a joke, I actually speak parfait French as well
as maximus Latin.
I credit the nuns.
SUGGESTIONS:
Put duration times on the MP3s - it makes
it easier to figure out how many CDs I need
and how many fit on each, otherwise it
takes time to transfer them only to find out they won't fit.
Tab
That, too, is a good idea.
This is why I wanted feedback - to get ideas on fixing what can
be fixed and explain what can't.
I remember one fella said he liked the show, but he said I needed a better voice :)
"Only Rumsfeld
could scramble fighters"
As seen in The BartCop Forum
Excerpt:
...What’s more, the decades-old procedure
for a quick response by the nation’s air defense
had been changed in June of 2001. Now,
instead of NORAD’s military commanders being able
to issue the command to launch fighter
jets, approval had to be sought from .... Donald Rumsfeld.
This change is extremely significant, because
Mr. Rumsfeld claims to have been "out of the loop"
nearly the entire morning of 9/11
Is this another in a long line of smoking
guns?
Is it true that the
BFEE changed the rules so only
Rummy could protect America?
Is that why the 9-11 hit was so spectacular
and successful? Because Rummy left the back door open?
Oh sure, they'll claim, "Mistakes were made," but don't forget
>Bart's
Law #2
> Any time a person or entity makes a "mistake"
that puts extra money (or power) in their pocket,
> expect them to make that "mistake" again and again
and again.
Rummy changes the rules for engagement,
but then is "unavailable" when America needed a Sec Def most,
how can they continue to run on the "We
can fight terra better" platform?
Assuming all this is legit, will John Kerry mention it in the debates with Whistle Ass?
Note: There are thousands
of great posts and stories in The
BartCop Forum.
I'll bet most of you never even clicked on the link.
It's like a whole city in there.
Subject: My lousy Father's day
Bart, I've been dropping hints to my damn
kids all month that I wanted
a subscription to what I assume is your
very fine BartCop Radio program.
I raised them, changed their diapers, wiped
their snotty little noses,
bought them bicycles and paid for school
and clothes and all I got for
Father's day was some butt-ugly ugly neckties
from those little ingrates.
Tell me kids for me they're cut off
and they're out of the will,
until I get my subscription to BartCop
Radio
Sincerely,
Millions of fathers in dozens of
countries
Bad offspring!
Click Here to get back into Dad's will
Subject: Unsolicited advice from one who means well
Bart,
I was thinking about your [recent medical]
adventure. Glad the doc ditched the meds.
A very large number of people, in my estimation,
are over-medicated. In the case of older folks,
to the point of toxicity. Regardless
of an underlying condition, please consider the following:
proper ventilation both summer and winter.
Are you getting enough oxygen in a room with all that equipment?
Positional changes: get up and move
around more often. Vision check?
Staring at the computer screen is a strain
even for those of us who don't kill ourselves at it for a living.
Inner ear disturbance? Very common.
And simple to correct. Low blood pressure? Low blood sugar?
Have they been checked regularly?
Finally, just to butt in to the Nth degree, are you eating properly?
You're not a kid anymore, you know!
Hoping you'll stay well.
Best regards to "V. Barkley",
LizW
I think of this as a murder mystery, but I'm still here to help
with clues.
I'm convinced the big clue is in the time it takes to go down.
When this things hits, I go from perfect ...to
on my back in 45 seconds.
This nutty doctor I saw Friday diagnosed the opinion that I mixed
up too many drugs, but I've done
enough drugs in my life to know they don't suddenly slam
you to the floor in less than a minute.
That's the clue - but what does it mean?
Another clue - I never totally lose consciousness, and yes I'm
sure.
Plus, both
times I was at my Hell of Gates computer, typing away.
First time, 3:30 in the afternoon, second time 9:30
in the morning.
Sidebar: This isn't related to anything
serious, apparently.
My serious doctor says I'm his only
patient who faints, so it's a "regular" thing
EKG, BP, blood and whatever else all show normal.
Plus, I have the strength of ten men.
I think Theory One, that I was dehydrated and flew without popping
my ears, is bogus.
I mean, I could buy that, but FOUR days later, with me crashing
like a shot duck?
I think Theory Two is equally flawed.
Eating three Meclazine and two Benadryls may sound like a party
at Charlie Sheen's house,
but no way those are going to drop me like a right from Mike
Tyson.
So, it's a mystery.
Got any ideas?