POLITICS - HUMOR - FINE TEQUILA - TRAVEL - ENTERTAINMENT |
||||
|
||||
Gene
Lyons
|
|
|
|
Mirna,
you are an opprobrious,lying whore.
sincerely,
suarna
From: TREVOR206@aol.com
Subject: Republican Response to Late Reagan Papers
BC, I am on a list with my fraternity alumnus
from college. There's a couple hundred on the list.
I often argue with the loud mouth conservatives
on there. I posted the question to the list as to why Bush
keeps delaying the release of the papers.
Here's a typical response that I've copied and pasted for you...
"Just because things are late does not mean
there is any "conspiracy" here.
Not unless you are watching too much
X-files."
Cute, but wrong.
There is, without any doubt, a conspiracy here because Bush 41
pardoned the guilty to keep
the conspiracy from being discovered. That's a fact.
It's my opinion that Bush threw the 92 election to help
bury the secret forever.
I think Smirk was appointed as payback for Bush throwing 1992
away.
I doubt the Reagan papers contain a "smoking gun," but they certainly
contain clues
or why would Bush fight so hard to keep documents we own
from seeing the light of day?
"Virtually all of Reagan's stuff has been released."
Good thing they put that "V" word in there.
It sounds like, "But Officer, your searched
virtually the entire car.
There's no need to search the glovebox,
too."
Why not let the American people decide what's important and what's not?
"Usually, things are released late because
there just isn't the organization to take care of
third tier presidential papers.
There is no reason to think anything big is going on there."
If that means the Bush people are bungling idiots who can't get
the job done, I might buy that.
But when Ken Starr demanded 400,000 different documents be delivered
to him by Monday,
the right screamed "What's Clinton hiding?"
again and again, over and over, again and again.
...and Clinton never pardoned anybody to hide anything.
"Don't be paranoid. Those "files" will
come out. When they do, and there is nothing to it,
you'll see what a fool you are.
Oh wait, you never see that."
ha ha
"Don't be paranoid?"
When fighting a former(?) head of the CIA?
ha ha
Sure, they'll come out after Weak & Stupid leaves office.
I think we should get the facts before our vote gets stolen
a second time.
"You made one hell of a jump to some Big Conspiracy.
Why don't you tell us what's in the
papers so you can say "I told you so" when they come out."
No, when Bush pardoned Reagan's felons, he shifted that burden
from us to him.
He pardoned those people to keep something hidden. The
press is afraid to ask why.
Whatever it was, it would've destroyed Reagan's reputation and
would've probably caused
a whole nother round of pardons.
Why is it the people had a "right to know the facts" when it was
Clinton's cock,
but when it's multiple felonies by dozens of people at the highest
levels to arm terrorist nations
we don't need to bother with all the details?
Tell those Listboys I'm right here if they ever grow a pair.
A
military base inside Afghanistan,
that's what Rumsfeld says he's going
build
When they do, I predict the Taliban will get a few miles upwind
of the new base
and unlease a few tons of super-refined anthrax spores.
What will our boys do?
Shoot the anthrax spores?
Pray for rain?
Track it with futuristic radar?
Wear space suits 24/7?
...retreat?
From: bushblowsus@yahoo.com
Subject: What a load of horseshit
THE SEXUAL RAGE BEHIND ISLAMIC TERROR
BC, this has to be the biggest load of horseshit you've ever printed.
Oh, I've printed lots crazier stuff than that - ask around.
Under these rules, then the Masai of eastern Africa
ought to be leading the charge of terrorist activities,
since they live (or lived) in a culture where
young men are seperated from the village at age 12
and sent off to live with the warriors.
There, they enter into homosexual relationships
with older men, some of them as old as their late 20s.
Because they are young, they are subordinate
to the will of these older warriors. They live in these
warrior societies until they are 30, at which
time they are allowed to return to the village life, get married,
and have a family. Meanwhile, girls as young
as 12 are married off to men in their 30s or older.
Yet the Masai have been living this way for thousands
of years. So did the Greeks.
Read Socrates and Aristotle and see them talk
about their boys.
What disrupts these societies is not their ages-old
sexual practices, it is the repressive sexual beliefs
of the Christian missionaries who come in and
stigmatize the behaviors they have practiced normally
and healthily for thousands of years. It is the
images of rampant sexuality combined with sexual represssion
delivered by western media. It is the foisting
off of puritanical western morality upon these people that creates
clashes in their cultures, creates the guilt
and victimization this article claims is happening. The writer might
have a pee aitch dee, but he is an utterly
clueless homophobe with a right wing agenda to demonize Islamic
cultures so we'll all feel better about bombing
children. He used a lot of words to say, basically, this -
"Islam creates an entire population of repressed,
self-loathing, suicidal fags."
Jeff Crook
Jeff, I'm not sure what you're saying...
Are you saying that writer is so wrong the idea shouldn't have been
read?
Are you saying the writer can't possibly have been right?
I've never lived in a society with out females, so there's no way I can...
Wait, I went to Catholic High schools where they had no women,
but we were to busy building tunnels and trying to escape to worry
about,
so I don't know what the camel-humpers do when women are less-than
zeroes.
I remember in 1980 the Ayatollah Khomeini (R-Reagan-partner) said it
was OK
to have sex with goats. (Female goats only, let's not get weird
or anything.)
But, in the middle of your note you seem to say this stuff happens all
the time,
while towards the closing of your note, you say it can't happen in
Afghanistan .
Perhaps I'm reading with tired eyes...
Quotes
"The military is dropping leaflets in
Afghanistan that say
'If you see a square yellow
box, that's food. Open it and eat it.
But if you see a round
yellow cylinder, that's a cluster bomb.
Don't try to open it or you will
die.' "
-- Aging horse molester Paul Harvey,
who apparently didn't get the memo...
Hey, Mr Ed, is Paul Harvey a patriot?
A Need for Honest Answers
Isn't it strange that we have to get the news of Mubarak's dissatisfaction
with
the "official" story regarding 9-11 from the MOSCOW Times?
Excerpt:
The famous address by British Prime Minister
Tony Blair that won the support of the British parliament, by his own
admission, did not contain sufficient
evidence for a British or U.S. court. Most of it had absolutely nothing
to do
with the attacks on New York and Washington
on Sept. 11, but merely described the prior and already well-known
terrorist activities of bin Laden.
The official version of events leaves such
a large number of unanswered questions that even Egyptian President Hosni
Mubarak, a loyal ally of the United States
in the Middle East, could not refrain from voicing certain doubts. Mubarak
is
himself a professional pilot and does not
understand how terrorists with minimal flying skills could have steered
the planes
to their targets. The Russian General Boris
Agapov, a well-known specialist on Afghanistan, cannot understand how
bin Laden and the Taliban, with their primitive
organization, could have executed such a large-scale act of terrorism;
he believes that one of the more competent
secret services must have had a hand in things. The German Berliner Zeitung
and the Indian Mainstream asked how the
terrorists could have implemented their plan without a single U.S. citizen
as accomplice.
Deaf
Rush Update
by R.B. Ham
Wag The
Bush:
Why The
Pentagon Spin Of The War Through PR Is Failing
by Jerry Politex, Bush Watch, 10/29/01 (www.bushwatch.com)
Larry Klayman is being a pain for Usurperboy
From: (withheld)
Subject: Re: Idea for a story from BartCop
Dear Bartcop,
You wrote:
> Reagan/Bush and our military were conspiring against the legally-elected
Carter administration
> to doom the "October Surprise" so the hostages could only be "saved"
by Saint Reagan months
> after they could've come home if the "October Surprise" had been
successful.
> ...but now, we're told to "watch what we say" because it might endanger
the troops?
> Why wasn't that good advice 21 years ago?
As you know, one of our mantras has been that
a healthy democracy needs honest
history and honest journalism. It has seemed
to me for years that the current round of
problems dates back to that period of the late
1970s and early 1980s. But because of
the parallel construction of an aggressive conservative
media/propaganda apparatus
and the failure of the Democrats/left-of-center-types
to counter it, that history was
grossly distorted and covered up.
So, I'm afraid we're left in that murky world
where we half-know important facts and I'm
afraid the October Surprise story remains in
that category, despite what we've been able to dig up.
The scorched-earth reaction to that story as
well as to the contra-drug stories has become
an object lesson for reporters who are tempted
to press too hard for these kinds of secrets.
Quotes
"Enron Energy company contributed $1.8
million to the Bush campaign and they got
a $254 million tax break.
That's a pretty good return on their investment."
-- Mark Shields, Capital Gang, October 27
...and those who didn't give at least a million can go straight to hell.
From: fred@arisart.com
Subject: Say What?
October 29, 2001 from CNN.com
'Calling the Taliban "an illegitimate,
unelected group of terrorists," Donald
Rumsfeld accused
the organization of using civilians as human
shields by placing military equipment in residential areas.
Defending the U.S.-led military campaign against
terrorist targets in Afghanistan, Rumsfeld blamed
the Taliban for "every single casualty in
this war."'
B.C,
Seems to me that Rumsfeld is part of the U.S. version of the group he is decrying...
And as for blaming the Taliban for "every single
casualty in this war," I guess it depends
on how far back one goes in a search of cause
and effect. From where I stand the blood
is on the hands of Reagan, Bush Sr. and all the
criminals they had and/or have in their employ
(Rumsfeld included). The same stain covers the
Supreme Court who installed this junta and
the talking radioheads who fomented the hate
necessary for people of this ilk to rise to power...
F.C.
Important Tequila News
Stroke Me, Stroke Me
"You know who I have a lot of faith in?
Don Rumsfeld and the Chief Joints of
Staff."
-- El Pigbo, last hour Monday
I think his hearing loss is just part of his stroke.
From: imk-01@home.com
Subject: Short thought
Hello BartCop,
What do you think, what percentage of Lockheed-Martin
employees
are republicans who think the government is too
big and their taxes too high?
Just a thought.
Ilkka Kokkarinen
Consumer Confidence Hits New Low
Consumer confidence plummeted like a sack of wet cement as the
bungling of President Weak & Stupid continued to amaze analysts.
"President Simp has sapped Americans'
optimism about job
security and the economy,"
said one Wall Street bond trader.
The New York-based Conference Board said Tuesday that its
Consumer Confidence Index sank to 85.5
from 97 in September.
Analysts were expecting a reading of 96.
"Widespread layoffs and rising unemployment
do not signal a
rebound in confidence anytime soon,''
said
Lynn Franco, director
of the Conference Board's Consumer Research Center. ``With
the
holiday season quickly approaching,
there is little positive
stimuli on the horizon. What we need
is the BartCop Tax Plan.''
The BartCop Tax Plan
>Rebate $1500 to every taxpayer two weeks before Thanksgiving.
> Rebate 10% of any income, for a total of $1500.
> Families with two workers could get $3000.
> If Dad, Mom and two teenagers are paying taxes on $15,000 or more,
> the family would get a rebate of $6,000 from the federal government.
> Every person with income qualifies. Retired people, people on Social
> Security - anybody with taxable income. What could be more fair?
> Think of the economic benefit.
> It would be the best Christmas ever for millions of families.
We could maybe still have that "best ever Christmas," if the Failure
in Thief
was looking out for more than just his super-rich billionaire
campaign contributors.
But noooooooooooooo.
A NOTE FROM
OFF-BROADWAY
by Mark Nassar
From: pauln@adhe.arknet.edu
Subject: Dr. Stanley Grogg
I'm sure the good citizens of K Drag will be planning
a reception and parade
upon the courageous Dr. Grogg's return.
(See yesterday's issue)
Will Bartcop provide us first hand coverage from
airport to the Williams building reception?
Paul M. Nations
Paul, there's a rumor he's considering a run for the House seat of Steve
Largent (R-Jesus Twin)
He could win.
The Smirk Administration speaks
Damn...
Last night, Dave said the Foul-mouthed bookmobile lady died.
If you never saw her do what she did to Dave, this won't give
you much of idea,
but this sweet, grandmotherly lady had a mouth worse than Jay
of Jay & Silent Bob.
It was one of the Top Ten hardest laughs I've ever had to work
through.
She did this bit a bunch of times, maybe a dozen, I don't know...
Each time she'd play a different character, but always with the
foulest of mouth.
Dave would say something totally and completely innocent, like,
"Excuse me, may I borrow this library
book?"
and the elderly lady would answer,
"No, you can't, you stupid son of a bitch.
Only an ignorant cock-sucking motherfucker
would even ask such a stupid goddamn
question in the first place, you asshole prick."
ha ha
That's what everyone heard between the sloppy edits and reading
her lips,
because NBC would let the "mother- ---ker"
come thru, so you knew what she was saying.
And when she was done, the gasp of the crowd was big enough to
sink the Titanic.
...and Dave would stand there - looking shocked after hearing this little old lady's language.
Seriously, the first or second time you ever saw her do that was hueueueuege.
...and don't think it's because I want to hear bad words on TV,
that's not the point.
The point is, even after Paulie's Walnuts has been shot, his
language is cleaner than
the Foul-mouthed Bookmobile Lady, or whatever her official name
was.
You can bet the people in the audience will never forget her...
...and poor Dave - this has been a tough stretch for him.
THE
SEXUAL RAGE BEHIND ISLAMIC TERROR
by Jamie Glazov
Excerpt:
Socially segregated from women, Arab men
succumb to homosexual behavior.
But, interestingly enough, there is no
word for "homosexual" in their culture in the
modern Western sense. That is because having
sex with boys, or with effeminate men,
is seen as a social norm. Males serve as
available substitutes for unavailable women.
The male who does the penetrating, meanwhile,
is not emasculated any more than if
he had sex with a wife. The male who is
penetrated is emasculated. The boy, however,
is not, since it is rationalized that he
is not yet a man.
From: blocked
Subject: it's cheney, he's the one behind all of this
BC:
Check this out from "Frontline"
it's from last year during the campaing.
Cheney is the one who thought up the term "homeland defense".
He talks about biological and nuclear attacks
against the United States.
"I think about the whole need for homeland
defense. If there is an area where we have not done
nearly enough in terms of thinking about our
vulnerability as a society--thinking about how an
adversary might want to come at us and attack
us--it's in the whole area of vulnerability
that we find here inside our continental borders."
and
"But think about the possibility of somebody
bringing a weapon of mass destruction into
the United States, or detonating a nuclear
weapon inside the United States, or releasing
biological or chemical agents. It's not a
traditional kind of attack from an adversary from
enemy territory, but it's something that is
internally generated. Or think about attacks on
our intelligence or energy infrastructure.
It is important for us to begin to think about how
do we defend against that. How do we collect
intelligence against those kinds of threats?"
The man is either psychic or knows too much about what's going on.
Mick
Well, compared to President Nosebleed, even Ol' BartCop looks pretty
damn sharp.
I just heard on ABC Radio that with this new terrorism threat, Cheney
is having to stay
in whatever secret, fortified location they hide him in.
Meanwhile, Weak & Stupid is at the World Series tonight with
50,000 potential attackers,
hogging the spotlight and proving he can toss a ball to the correct
base on command.
Please God, protect Dick Cheney and keep our country safe.
U2 on Dave
last night
Two of the best three bands inside of a week
Democratic Underground's Top Ten Conservative Idiots
Not sure why, but I have Rocky Raccoon stuck in my head today.
Read the Previous Issue
It had everything.
Copyright © 2001,
bartcop.com
Thanks for the
fumble, Dude.