Fair & balanced POLITICS - HUMOR -
FINE TEQUILA - OUTRAGE
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
Links Contact Us Project 60 Demo Underground JFK Conspiracy Entertainment BartCop Sports MediaWhoresOnline Chat & Post BartCop Reader The Vegas Report New to BartCop? BartCop Books Online Journal Bart Cook Your Ad Here BartCop Store Buzzflash Joe Conason Gene Lyons Julie Hiatt Steele |
I have a question:
Why is Al Qaeda only hiding in countries where Halliburton "needs" a pipeline?
The
Vatican Rag
by Maureen Dowd - she hates everybody
- this time it's the Pope.
Click Here
Excerpt:
The Vatican's reaction can be summed up
this way:
Priests don't abuse boys. Americans do.
The Vatican has shrugged off the international
spate of sex abuse cases
and acted as if this is another overhyped
American tabloid sex scandal.
Could Saddam Hussein be a disgruntled employee?
With all this war talk heating up, I wonder if
anyone has thought of the possibility
that Saddam Hussein could go postal if he thought
that his time was coming to an end.
The shooting at the aircraft plant this week by
the man who thought he was going to be
laid off got me to thinking. I saw two retired
generals on TV yesterday saying that we could
topple Saddam in a couple of weeks, sending in
700 bombers a day. What has he got to lose?
He could figure it's all over and empty his arsenal
of weapons of mass destruction on Israel
and go out a hero of the Islamic World. If I
was Israel, I think I would be telling the Frat Boy
to cool his jets. If a man has nothing to lose,
then he might as well establish his place in history.
Ben Larson
The Last Liberal in the Texas Panhandle
http://www.lastliberal.com
I agree.
If the Bush boy has PROOF Saddam is behind 9-11, why doesn't he release
it?
Everything the B.F.E.E. does must be shrouded in secrecy with
a "trust us" mentality.
Well, I don't trust the Bush Family Evil Empire.
Amazing that the press and the courage-impaired Democrats let them get away with it.
By the way...
Christian is at Julie's this weekend, so it will be tomorrow
before she can respond to juliefest2002@yahoo.com
e-mail.
Housekeeping
That mailbox at mindspring.com isn't working out very well.
We'd better go back to using bartcop@bartcop.com
I can only get it at night, but it beats not getting it at all.
Thanks to Wizard of Whimsy
Clinton
covered for the BFEE because...?!?!?!
by Phillip Schuman
Click Here
Excerpt:
If you haven't read Terry Reed's book 'Compromised:
Clinton, Bush, and the CIA,' it is quite
a read, and seems credible to me (which
see). Reed is no knee-jerk Clinton basher, reserving
his worst criticism for Bush & Co.,
and stating that if the electoral choice was between Bush or
Clinton, he would vote for Clinton as far
less a criminal than Bush. A friend of Barry Seale's,
he recounts Seale's claim of the aborted
DEA sting at Opa-Locka Airport in Florida, wherein
a couple of kilos of coke were picked up
by Jeb and George W. Bush (George piloting the plane).
Still, he puts then-Gov. Clinton in on
Reagan/Bush era Casey/North/Contra Mena money
laundering and cocaine smugglingactivities,
by his own purported eye-witness evidence.
But if Clinton was in on the B.F.E.E., why was he totally broke until he got his book money?
What seems a lot more likely is when you're
an unknown governor of a small farming state,
and the White House calls and says they
need some local cooperation with a super-secret CIA
operation that needs to land some small
planes at the Mena airport at night when it's closed,
odds are that unknown governor will say,
"Whatever you need, Sir."
Going somewhere? ...like, ...maybe ...Washington DC on
April 27th?
Use this link and they'll send me a nickle.
Quote
"Behind the ostensible government sits enthroned
an invisible government
owing no allegiance and acknowledging
no responsibility to the people.
To destroy this invisible government,
to befoul the unholy alliance between
corrupt business and corrupt politics
is the first task of the statesmanship of the day."
-- Theodore Roosevelt, 19-Apr-06
Unfortunately Junior Bush is NO STATESMAN
and contributes to the problem
with large corporations like Enron writing
his Government Policy and then hiding
behind the 5th ammenmdment when Senators
ask about his unholy alliance with his contributers.
A Loyal Democrat and Bartcop Fan, Asa.
p.s. PLEASE POST MY E-Mail Address!! I enjoy
the whiney hate mail from Ditto Monkeys
tortured by The Truth! Also, I would like
your views of that loyal patriot David Brock,
I saw on C-SPAN2, who was preserving the
Clinton Legacy.
Brock's got trouble coming...
FreeRepublic.com "A Conservative News Forum"
http://www.freerepublic.com/forum/a3b40a7ef7f28.htm
NEED DIRT ON BROCK!
> One of the lawyers in my office asked me to
get on the Internet and find dirt on David Brock
> (the reporter who's trying to screw Justice
Thomas).
> I found a few articles on the web, but if anyone
out there can give me real dirt
> (substantiated or not) or can direct me where
I can get said dirt, please freepmail me.
> All intel will be held in confidence. THANKS!
You know what Brock's crime was?
Brock was given a million dollars to write a book about Hillary.
His only orders were "We want proof she's
a lesbian."
That's all they wanted from Brock.
So Brock set out to do another hit piece on another liberal.
For reasons unknown to me, Brock produced a book that, while not flattering
to the First Lady
of the last legally-elected president, was no "hit piece," and for
that Brock must be destroyed.
The Scaife-financed Republican hate machine is now going after Brock.
The ditto-monkeys operate on the mob mentality - "nobody gets out alive."
Since he failed to prove Hillary is a lesbian, he'll probably get the Kangas treatment.
Give Pervs the Inquisition
Excerpt:
In the real world, sex-offending creeps
are put behind bars.
In the Catholic Church they are sent on
"retreat."
Retreat? What's that?
A vacation without children?
Toon swiped from Marty's
E! page
The Lessons
of Whitewater
a cheap-shot editorial by the more-whore-than-ever New York Times
What a total load of crap this is, written by the paper that screamed
"serious crimes"
when the GOP's most rapid attack dogs could find nothing of the
sort even after
THREE "independant cousels," $75M and nine years of zipper sniffing.
Excerpts:
The Clinton era ended for real last week,
with neither a bang nor a whimper, but only a 2,090-page report.
Robert Ray, the last of three independent
counsels on the Whitewater investigation, released his findings,
closing an inquiry that came to dominate
much of Bill Clinton's eight years in office. Mr. Clinton's defenders
will argue that the entire investigation
was a waste of more than $64 million in taxpayers' money. But we hope
that Whitewater will be a permanent reminder
to people who seek elective office that the best defense against
any inquiry is to volunteer the truth.
Wrong. They volunteered at least a thousand times that they had
done nothing wrong, but daily headlines
such as, "Clintons
innocent" won't make any money for a once-great,
once-trusted newspaper
that has since turned into Matt Drudge's personal gossip page.
...and then this:
The Whitewater issue was first raised by
The New York Times during the 1992 presidential campaign.
The issue involved serious questions,
and the investigation that followed led to plea agreements or
convictions for more than a dozen people,
most of them with political or business ties to the Clintons.
There you go again, trying to cover your exposed, guilty ass.
Yes, YOU witchhunters started this never-ending zipper hunt with
horseshit allegations that you
got
from what Scaife-funded source? If honesty is the best
policy, why can't the New York Times admit
they were errand boys for the whites-only, supply-side, tobacco
whores of the Republican party?
From the very beginning of the Clinton era, the Old Gray Lady
ran every Drudge-fabricated
"Clinton
Fathered Black Baby with Crack Whore" story he
fed them.
And the idea that "people with ties to the Clintons" were pursued?
Let's spend one year and $7M on the Bush Family
Evil Empire and see what pops up.
But noooooooooo. Stealing the White House isn't a crime.
The only crimes the Old Grey Slut wants to chase are the
"crimes" of Clinton's zipper.
What a disgusting icon you have become for young journalists
everywhere.
This page urged the Clintons to cooperate
so often that it became the editorial version of shouting
oneself hoarse. But their refusal to provide
full and frank answers on matters like Mrs. Clinton's
mysteriously mobile billing records turned
the case into a cottage industry of White House obfuscation.
That's your idea of "proof of guilt?" That they couldn't
locate a box of documents?
Clinton was accused every wild crime under the sun, and THIS
is your "proof of guilt?"
That they couldn't locate a box of documents?
(Reminder - the "mysterious" documents were eventually located
and then scrutinized more closely
than the Zapruder film and the Dead Sea Scrolls combined
and what did they find on Hillary's papers?
Hillary's fingerprints!
That provided another tawdry headline for the Old Grey Slut.
"What were
Hillary's fingerprints doing on her papers?")
Let's put it in stone right now:
ANY administration that cannot or will not provide full and immediate
documentation on ANY papers
demanded by the opposition part is guilty, guilty, guilty and
should go right to f-ing jail.
But, of course, after the Bush Family Evil Empire allowed
Enron to rape California families
last year for up to TEN TIMES the fair price of energy to heat
their homes, the Vice Oil man
has flat-out REFUSED to explain this administration's role in
assisting Enron with that rape,
but the Old Grey Slut wants to harp on Clinton's zipper
as "the real crime."
New York Times - you're Matt Drudge without that hat - that's
all.
Oscar Fever!
*Last Day* Fine luxury chocolate!
Click
for details
click here for great chocolate
From: Srush
Subject: the liberal media
why is that the ones who are supposed to be liberal
never get to do a special on the so called
liberal networks about the ownership of all of
those radio stations that do not employ liberals
as talk show hosts? why is that no one from the
liberal side offers evidence about the publishers
and owners of newspapers and tv stations that
spout the right wing line?
why is that the so called liberal media never
looks at rupert and roger ailes to see what their agenda is?
everyone calls CNN the Clinton Network but they
trashed the president as did Fox and MSNBC.
fox devotes its 24/7 time not to reporting on
the news but is a mouth piece for the bush administration.
keep tabs on what they actually report, it is
not real investigative reporting but just what is handed to
them from the pentagon or the white house. and
even their so called anchors do not read the news,
they editorialize the news.
where is howard kutz on this?
oh i guess he is off writing another book about
how he looks at journalism.
i want to know where is the so called liberal
media?
i guess if you say is often enought the public
really does believe that the post and the times
are liberal but the washington times is a fair
and balanced newspaper just like fox,
we report you decide, like yeah, ...i believe
that.
An
Evening with Julie Hiatt Steele
April 27th in Washington D.C.
Click Here New Total
Write to Julie at PO Box 1351, Virginia Beach, VA 23451
E-mail to Julie, use juliehiattsteele@bartcop.com
PayPal to Julie, Click Here ->
To buy tickets to Julifest2002,
PayPal to bartcop@bartcop.com
OR .Snail
mail to bartcop.com,
PO Box 54466.
Tulsa, OK 74155
If you send me anything send your phone number
Send Juliefest inquires/confirmations to Juliefest2002@yahoo.com
35 days from today.
.............................................
click to order Buy 3, get free shipping
Have you ever thought that Tim Russert is to the Bush Administration
what C.J. Craig is to the Bartlet Adminsitration?
I watched Meet the Whore this morning and marveled at
the foot-round softballs Timmy threw to the Vice Oil man.
Never a follow up, never a critical take on anything Unka Dick
said, but always a
"Thanks for sharing that important information
with us, Your Emminence."
Tim, you're such a bought-and-paid for whore.
You wouldn't know objectivity if it bit you on the ass.
Update
You'd be crazy to trust me -
but trust me.
We're one e-mail away from tripling the cost of tickets
to Juliefest2002
Could I be lying?
Sure, but not about this - not this time.
I told a couple of people, and they all used the "F" word to describe
their incredulity.
Once the dam breaks, I can't even get my good friends
in because there's only so
many people who can fit in the plane.
You can still get in for only $75
...hold on, let me check my e-mail...
(...Jeopardy song...)
...yes, you can still get in for just $75
but if/when that e-mail hits,
tickets may go to $225
without notice, because there's just not enough room.
If I was lying I'd tell you.
Today's issue is kinda short.
I got up late because of the live Zeppelin party we had last night
(that's a story!)
and I have to get started on Monday's issue, and get a load on
for the Oscars,
so I leave you with this - the story of the screaming eagles.
Shopping
online?
Use the portal below and they'll throw bartcop.com
a nickel and
it costs you nothing more than whatever you
were going to pay.
Read the Previous Issue
It had everything.
Copyright © 2002,
bartcop.com
Shirley Manson -
contact bartcop.com