That's an unusual question, but I try to answer those...
Yes, if there was evidence, I'd print it right here at
bartcop.com
If you believed that voting Republican
was a dangerous act due to the poisonous and vile things that Republican
politicians did, wouldn't you want to warn
everyone you could that they should avoid the Republican Party?
[Isn't this kind of what you do now?]
Yes! That evidence is all around us - you bet!
For a Christian, someone that is not a believer
is doomed to death.
Only through accepting Christ as Savior
and Lord is someone able to obtain Eternal Life in Heaven.
It's real possible we shouldn't even be having this talk, because
neither of us is going to budge.
But if you still want to go on...
I think it's a form of insanity to believe there is an afterlife.
Since there is absolutely no evidence of that,
you must believe that because someone said it or you read it
in a book.
We each think the other is crazy. Good thing we're liberals
who can accept that we have differences.
BTW, are you a Christian every day?
Or are you one of those Tuesday, Thursday, Saturday Christians?
By that, I'm asking if you're a pro-choice Catholic, or a bacon-eating
Jew.
[As opposed to the Muslims, there is no requirement
that you kill an unbeliever to obtain the highest goal.]
As a result, a Christian is motivated and
commanded to share what they know with those that don't believe,
in order to prevent their demise.
I didn't say I couldn't figure out your (their) motivation, I
just thing you're as wrong as bad math.
Your criticism of all those who share their
faith as merely expressing doubt, cheerleading, groupthink, insanity,
weakness, etc. is misplaced.
I admit that's possible, but then it's incumbent
on you to explain their behavior.
What other reason could there be for the
irrational need for constant reinforcement?
I believe the zeal to turn others onto
your religion should be suppressed.
Although some may have such failings, not
all of them do.
I understand that you are trying to make
a joke, but it can marginalize your voice when you marginalize others.
Some readers are anti-corn, some are anti-Shirley, some are anti-Chinaco,
some are anti-Clinton.
I should keep my opinions to myself if I think someone might
disagree with one of them?
Since these guys are simply doing the same
thing you are, although regarding a different subject, your rants are
almost hypocritical. And if
you get so hot and bothered by the subject, it's hard to see it as just
a joke.
Dave
Dave, I wouldn't want some BartCop Monument in a courthouse -
because if somebody was
crazy enough to carve such a monument - it would be out of place
on federal land.
...but that doesn't mean we can't join forces to defeat that
Monkey in the White House.