Apparently you only respond to arguments which you think you can easily refute.
So far, you're batting zero.
Is there any chance you'll calm down and allow reason to infect
your brain?
I'd really like to hear your twisted spin
on this one. I realize you have only time to read short stuff and this
is as short as I can make it, however it
contains one short, necessary newspiece which illustrates the point.
Juheezus X, you had yet another of your
supernaturally obtuse statements about how the Israelis don't "target"
children AGAIN today. On this subject you
sound like those GOOP morons who believe everything Dumya says
despite all evidence to the contrary.
See? there you go again.
Because we disagree on this, I must be the idiot?
You've apparently written off the possibility that you
could be wrong.
That makes you much more like the Pinhead President than anything
I've said.
Now, what does target mean to you? If someone
willfully throws a bomb into a crowd where he knows there
are kids, and he KNOWS that many children
will certainly be killed and thereby kills a dozen of them but says
"Why, sweet shit, your honor, I was really only
trying to cap a certain individual who was in that crowd and the
kids, who I knew were there, and absolutely
knew would be killed, maimed or mutilated were not my real targets",
would that satisfy you as to the purity
of his intentions?
By your definition, the following men are all guilty of targeting
children:
George W Bush, Bill Clinton, George Herbert-Herbert Bush, Ronald
Reagan, Jimmy Carter,
I can't remember if Ford bombed anybody - probably did, Nixon,
LBJ, JFK, Eisenhower,
Truman (My God, how many children did Harry target
Aug 6, 1945?)
I don't even know you, but I'm certain you can't be as
stupid as you sound.
Are you saying there's NO DIFFERENCE between Carter, Clinton
and the mad Palestinian bombers?
That's what I'm hearing, do you realize how stupid that sounds?
Target is when you intentionally search for the most children to murder.
Your mental masturbations have screwed up your head.
Your investment in the hatred of Israel has clouded your thoughts.
The worst lies are the ones you tell yourself, and it's not pretty.
If so, then you're not just shitting us
about your 64 IQ and only by means of employing this most mendacious
technicality -- which disgustingly dishonest
rationale should really add to the burden of this person's guilt, not
detract from it -- are they able to mount
a refutation, albeit disgustingly hollow to the honest auditor.
You're stuck on a bad point. As long as you think there's
no difference between a president and a religio-crazy
who murders kids for whatever nutty-ass reason, we're not going
to be able to have a conversation.
Now, when, in addition, they make a practice
of this criminal recklessness, day after day, year after year,
decade after decade, relentlessly and with
no variation, I believe one would have to be a goddam fool to
parrot their sociopathic evasions for it.
In addition to this there is also much evidence of outright murder of
civilians, however, I will stick to this
one point right now. Following is a very recent -- two or three days ago
-- incident of precisely the kind I have
just mentioned -- there will probably be a more immediate one to report
tomorrow morning.
Three killed by Israeli gunship attack
01/09/2003 - 16:25:20
Israeli helicopters fired at least four
missiles at a car in Gaza City today, killing three people and wounding
at least 20 in the sixth such attack in
a fortnight.
The target of the attack was believed to
have been an Palestinian militant. Israel has been waging war on
the
Islamic group Hamas in retaliation for
a deadly suicide bombing that killed 21 people on a Jerusalem bus last
month.
Including today's attack, 14 Palestinians,
including at least 10 Hamas members, have been killed in missile strikes.
The missiles hit a small car as it was
driving in a crowded side street in Gaza City.
Witness Salman Abu Nour, 42, said he was
working in his printshop when the missiles hit.
"I rushed outside, and saw a car like a
ball of fire. I brought my fire extinguisher and helped people to fight
the fire," he said.
Herein we see the noble objects of your
apologia firing a fucking MISSILE - a MISSILE into a busy street where
they
know -- absolutely know -- that many people
nearby will be fried, mutilated and killed but they are not targeting them.
The evidence YOU submitted said Israel was targeting a Palestinian
militant. If a Palestinian blows some shit up,
then hides under his momma's bed, why are you angry with Israel
for blowing up his mother's bed?
If the bomber was hiding in the desert, and Israel knew that,
and they intentionally bombed his mother's house,
then I would say you had a rational point, but so far, rational
is the last adjective I'd use to describe you.
Y'know, I can tell you're an educated person, and I'll bet you
make sense on lots of other topics.
But the second this subject comes up, the steam starts shooting
out your ears and you lose all control.
There is not a chance the innocents will
be hit -- there is an absolute certainty. There is not a chance
they will be maimed
-- it is an absolute certainty.
But the killers can fall back, for the salvation of their degraded souls
on the pathetic, dishonest,
quibbling horseshit that they weren't "targeting"
anyone but a certain badass. Well, I guess it all depends on what the meaning
of gullible idiot is -- and you have the
gall to talk about how you can't " get people to realize their bridge doesn't
connect."
INCREDIBLE.
Funny how you use "killers" for the side that tries to avoid civilian
casualties, but you haven't use "killers"
to describe the people who get on school buses then pull the
pin. You've lost yourself in your hate.
This is becoming nothing but a waste of time.
You've lost the ability to think because you're temporarily insane.
Wait, let's try a sports analogy, maybe that'll make it thru:
Is ther any difference between a terrible baseball player striking
out, and Barry Bonds lining a shot
off the center field wall and getting thrown out trying to stretch
a double into a triple?
You see, both resulted in an out, but they came about in very
different ways.
(I know this is a bad analogy, but I'm trying to reach a blockhead.)
The problem is that some of us know the
difference between the actual truth and the technical truth and you usually
do to
-- in fact you've got a nose for it. That's
what makes this case so strange. You don't have visions in your mind of
one of
those stereotypical "rich Jews" coming
along and funding your radio dreams do you? If so, forget about it
-- morons of
whatever faith or persuasion who appreciate
your kind of thinking on this particular matter are almost bound to be
on the
other side of the political aisle. Do us
all a favor and quit trying so hard to kiss ass over that unBRIDGEable
abyss.
Pete in Montana
Yeah, that's right, some rich Jew (with a big nose) came along
with a big check and I sold out.
You've lost your ability to listen or think. You've got
a forest fire burning in your head, and it's preventing you
from remembering that I don't have a dog in this race. You're
not fighting with a pro-Israel zealot. I just don't
see the logic in waiting until the most kids get on the bus to
pull the pin. Israel doesn't do that and we both know it,
but only one of us still has control over his brain.
No matter how much you've been taught to hate the Jews, there
are differences.
You're so blinded by hate, that you can't see the difference
between Palestinians killing as many kids as possible
and the accidental deaths of children who were near the intended
target of the Israeli army..
Your intransigence makes Bush seem like a waffler on tax cuts.
To close, I'm going to construct a sentence for you to agree with or not:
There's no difference between Bill Clinton ordering the bombing
of Kosovo
and the guy who blew up that bus full of Jewish kids a couple
of weeks back.
I say there's a difference.
What does your forest fire tell you?