From: Podvin
Subject: re: Your Ongoing Fantasy That Kobe Bryant Is The Persecuted Victim Of Racism
Despite your recurring insistence that one
of America's favorite commercial spokespeople has suddenly become the object
of
society's malignant racial animus, you
continue to refuse to answer the question that blows your inane premise
straight to hell:
[He's usin' fancy language - I gotta be careful with this guy...]
Dude, I'd be damned surprised if you could
stump me on a question on that which I had stated a strong opinion
but I would enjoy the challenge, so let's
see what you got.
If Bryant really is the victim of an obscenely
racist culture, then why is he able to walk the streets
while being hailed by adoring fans at the
same time his alleged white victim...
Did you really write "his
alleged
white victim?"
If you'd ease back on the hysterics, you
might gain some converts.
...hides fearfully in her house as a result of numerous death threats?
I'll answer your question in a second, but
you appear to be saying there's no racism in America.
That's a really wild and crazy thing to
state.
You've now had months to gin up a coherent response to this Grand Canyon-sized hole in your little theory
ha ha
Pod makes his move, whe's going
"all in" with the nutty question.
- share it with those of us who lack your vivid imagination and vicarious paranoia.
The answer is pretty simple: Liberals don't
hate black people and the GOP does.
It's called "the difference between the
two big political parties."
Most blacks and many liberals like/liked
Kobe. But to the GOP, he's just another
"sex-crazy nigger" out to rape a white
girl. That's why he's in trouble in Colorado.
If you knew something about politics I wouldn't
have to explain this to you.
Once having done so, you can then explain why your position on this matter is not the most vile form of misogyny.
ha ha
It's because I'm a woman-hating pig - where
have you been?
A young woman alleges that
she has been raped,
and the authorities believe there is ample
evidence to prosecute,
Well, sure they do - he's an "uppitty Hollywood
nigger" and she's a local white girl.
What other conclusion might a God-fearing,
GOP Colorado cop come to?
...and yet - without the slightest shred of factual substantiation
That part is true - we have very
little facts and a lot of speculation.
- you dismiss her claim that she was brutally violated,
When did I do that?
Last issue, I said the police refuse to
say how many times she's yelled "Wolf! in the last year.
That phrasing is an assumption because
the cops are hiding the records, which I understand is against
the law because the number of times
you call 911 and the reason you called is public record
in Colorado, it's NOT a privacy issue.
If the cops are willing to break the law to keep Kobe's
attorneys in the dark, that should concern
both of us, not just me.
And as far as her claim she was violated,
you've already stipulated that that is an allegation.
An allegation is defined as "an unsupported
assertion."
You've chosen to believe her, I'm waiting
for the evidence.
...instead choosing to manufacture your "Kobe Is A Persecuted Peon" fairy tale.
Maybe you have a point.
Maybe America has gotten past their racism.
Maybe "slavery" is a myth to make us feel
sorry for those lazy blacks who don't want to work.
Maybe those stories about lynchings and
beatings were all just a bunch of hooey.
Maybe http://www.kkk.com
is just something blacks made up to get sympathy.
Maybe Kobe can get a fair trial in lily-white
Eagle County.
Why do you hate women so much?
Because they're
a weaker, lesser class of human.
(That's a joke, don't write, OK?)
When we ultimately learn the reason that
Bryant desperately wants the preliminary to be closed,
will you be man enough to apologize to
this young lady, whose only "crime" is reporting a rape
that the authorities consider to be completely
plausible?
I realize you haven't had a chance to answer
yet, but it's my opinion that racist cops
will take whatever action is need to get
"one of them" off the street.
Where is your contradictory evidence?
Where is your decency?
I notice this recurring pattern that I often
find myself drawn into:
I give my opinion about a public matter,
then someone fires off a really nasty letter with a bunch of
personal insults when I've never insulted
the writer of said nasty letter. Why can't you argue about
what I wrote instead of attacking me, personally?
Why do you force the play out of bounds?
This is like a lot of arguments I get into.
I'm perfectly willing to admit Kobe Bryant could be guilty.
Scott Peterson could be guilty to, but
many people I debate are NOT willing to admit there's any
chance in hell they could ever be wrong.
By the way, whose side you take in Israel/Palestine?
I'll bet you could give me a whole lot
of Nancy Grace guarantees on that subject, too.
I remember all of the despicable Nicole
Brown-bashing that occurred about a decade ago
(She was a "gold digger" and a "slut", and she
"deserved what she got"). Apparently, your side
- the "Let's explain away violence against
women" side - never tires of being wrong.
Attacking me
over OJ is pretty stupid since I wasn't on the web then.
(For the record, I think he did it, but
how? The idiot LA cops never found the knife, never found the
Bruno Maglias, never found the bloody clothes,
which all had to be disposed when there was so little time,
OJ didn't even have time to take a shower.
That's a mystery nobody seems to demand an answer to.)
There are so many people of all colors who
are unjustly imprisoned because they lacked the resources
to obtain a proper defense, yet you are
whoring for one of America's wealthiest men who expelled a
nineteen year old from his hotel room after
doing SOMETHING that left her covered with bruises.
"Whoring," by definition, is taking money for
doing something you wouldn't ordinarily do.
Gee, your batting average is so bad you
couldn't play for Shreveport.
Also, no evidence has been released that
she was covered in bruises,
but even if it turns out there is, is there
evidence Kobe put them there?
You seem to be a little eager to get a
possibly innocent man behind bars.
Good work, Bart, or Dr. Laura, or whatever your name is...
ha ha
I'm the one with the identity problem?
Tell you what, since you're probably drunk,
I'm going be to be nice
and not reveal anything about the lawsuit
you tried to drag me into.
Lastly, I remember you being a normal, nice guy.
What happened to you?