Political Assassination:  From JFK to Al Gore
   by Elizabeth Handley <gorewon> of the Green Press

A patriot must be ready to defend his country against its government.
Truth is the hope of humanity against government power and abuse.
Truth opposes power.  This was never more true than in the 1960s
assassinations of President John F. Kennedy, Robert Kennedy, and Martin Luther
King.  These men were advocates of change and peace.  They were opposed
by conservative war-mongers who orchestrated their political executions,
and these murders were covered up by like-minded individuals.

In 1962, JFK signed a missile treaty with Russia, was taking steps to
end the war in Viet Nam, and refused to invade Cuba.  The power and
greed gang weren't having any of it.  The cover-up of JFK's assassination
was a blight on our history.  No sane person believes the Warren
Commission's assertion that there was one shooter.  51 witnesses heard shots
from the infamous grassy knoll proving unequivocally a triangulation of
fire.  Yet Arlan Spector of the Congressional Intelligence Oversight
Committee hammered home the idiotic "magic bullet theory."  The coup
d'etat orchestrated that day in Dallas was pervasive in its effect with
nothing left to chance.  The cover-up was so absurd that documents
concerning the JFK assassination have been made inaccessible to the public
until the year 2029.

Another coup d'etat, this one involving the stealing of the presidency
in 2000, was a criminal conspiracy that denied Al Gore the office he
rightfully won.  It is the biggest scandal in U.S. history since the
1960s.  A recent report by Lance deHaven-Smith, a professor of public
administration and policy at Florida State University,
idsmith@garnet.fsu.edu., reads in part that when all votes cast in the
2000 presidential election in the state of Florida were counted, Al
Gore received more votes than Bush.  Moreover, the law requires that all
discernable votes be counted and that rejecting ballots only because
they contain technical errors is a violation of Florida election law
(Section 101.5614(5)).

The New York Times and the Washington Post came to the bipartisan
conclusion that Florida's governor, Jeb Bush, secretary of state Katherine
Harris, and the Bush Republicans corroborated to manipulate the Florida
election by bending the rules on absentee ballots, blocking, stalling,
and discrediting manual recounts, and creating fear of a constitutional
crisis so that the U.S. Supreme Court would intervene.  Virtually every
newspaper in the country had gone along with the disturbing
anti-democratic notion that it was somehow unpatriotic for Al Gore to demand a
fair election.

Greg Palast has written extensively about the theft of the 2000 election and the
Florida vote for the London Observer.  Thousands of Americans flooded the
internet site www.gregpalast.com setting a record for the number of hits from
the information-hungry hordes,  blowing out the giant server computers.
The BBC ran the story and viewership increased by 10,000 as a result of
Americans demanding to see what they were denied on their own televisions.

The concept of a liberal media bias is a myth.  Most of the mainstream media is
owned by giant corporations closely associated with the Republican Party.
Now the GOP engages in political assassination by virtue of ridicule and control
of the press.  Lazy reporting, pack journalism, and GOP spin dominated the press
during the 2000 presidential campaign and election.  The mass media technique
of "distort, distract, and trash" continues to enable the right-wing agenda.

CNN's Reliable Sources August 10, 2002 was a genuine eye-opener. Guest
Josh Marshall, webmaster of Talking Points, stated, "...
I think deep down most reporters just have contempt for Al Gore.  I
don't even think it's dislike.  It's more like disdain and contempt."
None of the talking heads disagreed.  Guest Dana Milbank, White House
reporter for the Washington Post offered, "You know what it is?  I think
that Gore is sanctimonious and that's sort of the worst thing in the eyes
of the press.  And he has been disliked all along and it was because he
gives a sense that he is better than us ... as reporters."

The coverage of the 2000 presidential campaign was much more aggressive
and adversarial than ever seen before.  It was at times blatantly
dishonest.  The media practiced trivial "gotcha" journalism carried to the
absurd extreme.  Gore was mocked.  Press releases were FAX'd directly
from the GOP, and the press just didn't care if any of it was accurate.
Gore was misquoted, and reporters passed it on.  Some corrections were
run but in an off-handed way and after the fact.

The media focused on every insignificant misstatement or nuance by Gore
in 2000, while never delving in depth into the background of Bush or
the factual evidence of many of his shortcomings as governor of Texas.
Instead of focusing on the issues, the media focused on Al Gore's
alleged "serial exaggerations" and an armchair psychoanalysis of his
wardrobe.  Despite the fact that Gore is the quintessential straight-arrow, the
media convinced more Americans that Bush had more integrity even in the
face of Bush's drunk-driving arrest, his insider-trading at Harken, and
being AWOL from the Texas National Guard from 1971-1973.  The criticism
of Gore was so harsh, according to the Weekly Standard, "If Gore walked
on water, people would deride him for not being able to swim."

And now that Al Gore has re-entered the political fray, he continues to
be dogged by the same media that stepped on his presidential campaign
in 2000.

The media did a great disservice to this country.  We now are all
paying for their failure to responsibly and ethically do their jobs.  The
abusive reporting of Al Gore's campaign began with an incident known as
"Floodgate" and continued on until the most recent incident known as
"Ticketgate."  Simply put, the GOP employs a destroy and dash maneuver,
reporting false information, spinning it, and when the truth comes to
light the press has moved on to its next lie.

And now as midterm elections are approaching and 2004 is visible on the
horizon, disheartened and disgusted Democrats may be tempted to stay
away from the polls.  The Green Party is running candidates against
liberal candidates such as Paul Wellstone, probably the Senate's most
progressive member.  Votes siphoned off by the Green Party candidates could
result in the election of conservative Republicans.  And if we don't
find the heart to fight the prospect of a Republican-controlled Congress,
Bush's right-wing power grab will be completely unfettered.

Al Gore won the popular vote in 2000, garnering more votes for
president than anyone since Ronald Reagan, and he also garnered more votes than
any Democratic presidential candidate in history.

It is clear from Gore's appearances that he is prepared to assume the
take-no-prisoners approach in a rematch with Bush.  And he is invoking
the name of the man with the plan, the still outrageously popular
President Clinton.  And since the Bush presidency resulted from a Supreme
Court 5:4 vote, to energize voters Gore MUST be the Democratic nominee in
2004.  Not so much as revenge but rather a reckoning, to make right
what went so terribly wrong in Florida 2000.  A major correction is needed
in the course of our nation, first and foremost in the composition of
the next Congress.

There is a grassroots internet movement that is being
"misunderestimated" by the media and the Bush camp.  Rumor has it a
member of an anti-Bush website received a "little visit" from the Men in
Black after referring to Bush as "Crusader Bunnypants" in a chat room.
Another visitee was a gentleman who had too many anti-Bush bumper
stickers on his truck.  And Wheaton, Maryland resident, Mike Hershdorfer,
received a visit with regard to his website www.bushoccupation.com.
Dissent thrives on-line.

Politics has become a blood sport as evidenced by the attack ads on Tom
Daschle comparing him to Saddam Husssein for opposition to Alaska oil
drilling to John Ashcroft's suggestion that anyone who opposes his attempts
to bypass the Constitution is on the side of terrorism.  How do liberals and
moderates effectively fight this kind of political ruthlessness without doing
more damage to democracy?  We need to call on the fighting spirit of RFK
and the political savvy of JFK.  We need a War Room similar to that during
Clinton's first campaign to go toe-to-toe with the "scorched earth" tactics of
the GOP.  And we need to make the media Heathers accountable for their
complicity in the Bush blitzkrieg.

"The bigger the lie, the more people will believe it."
                       Adolph Hitler


back to  bartcop.com

Privacy Policy
. .