From: Mark Latzko
Subject: Hypocrisy
I know you're enjoying that 'a**hole' Lott's
utterances; you liberals are all bunged up
about a seeming crack in the Republicans
thrashing of you guys.
Yes, I sure am - I enjoyed it an awful Lott.
It's the first time since I started doing this (February 1996)
that the media went after a Republican.
In seven years, they've always given the GOP a pass and gone
after Democrats and nobody else.
But how about mentioning that Algore's father
voted WITH J. Strom Thurmond?
And that your God, Clinton, the greatest
being since Christ, to read your crap, gave the same
kind of public accolades, on Oct. 22, 2002,
to an Arkansas politician from that era that Clinton
looked up to, whom Clinton referred to
as his mentor, Sen. J. William Fulbright, who felt and
voted the same way as Strom, and Algore
SR.?
ha ha
You've been listening to the vulgar Pigboy again, haven't you?
Have you ever had an original, independent thought of your own?
The entire country was openly and overtly racist when Gore Sr
cast that vote.
Gore was from Tennessee, one of the most openly racist states,
so yes, two generations ago
racism was everywhere and the Democrats changed that so racists
like Thurmond, Reagan and
Trent Lott moved over to the GOP so they could continue to hate
blacks openly.
That's why your side can't get any black votes.
God's truth be known, I didn't know Fulbright was a racist (he's
from Arkansas, which is more racist
than Tennessee - how and why do you think Clinton was impeached?)
but unlike that idiot Lott, Clinton
didn't praise Fulbright for being a racist pig. Only a real numbnut
would do that. I was a kid in the sixties
and about all I know about Fulbright is that he was one of the
first Senators to come out against Vietnam.
Don't you know anything about the subject that has you
so incensed?
Don't you have any clues about this topic besides the
lies Rush told?
Where's the outrage from the liberal media?
Outrage over what?
You think we should all get inside a time machine and go back
40 years and dig up
Gore Senior and Fulbright and yell "Bad man," at them? What would
that accomplish?
Where's Maxine Waters?
I dunno - Washington DC?
Where's Jesse Jackson?
I dunno - Chicago?
Where's Al Sharpton?
I dunno - Harlem?
Where's Bartcop???
I'm right here Dude. We're talking - remember?
I guess those questions were supposed to mean something - I wonder
what it was...
This occurring during the 40 years of a Democrat controlled congress.
ha ha
Yeah, it happened 40 years ago.
Why do you think we can change history?
All we can change is the present, which is why YOUR guys dumped
Trent Lott.
Because he was an idiot/loser who reminded people what the GOP
currently
stands for.
The fact that Thurmond was arguing the States
Rights principles of the Founding Fathers as
opposed to an over-arching Government,
as the Constitution was written to prevent, doesn't
enter into your world view.
Besides proving that you agree with Lott's racist views, what
did that sentence accomplish?
Read the Federalist Papers.
ha ha
OK, when I finish the McDougal book, I'll look into reading that.
But I'll bet Susan's book has more big laughs...
You liberals and Democrats, the most racist
political party in American politics today,
continue with the race baiting, class envy,
socialist rhetoric that has failed every place it has been tried.
OK, Rush, whatever you say.
Black people vote 90/10 against you guys - don't you think they
know racism when they see it?
That is saying that a black person cannot think for his/herself if it's not what the Democrat line tells them to think;
No, that's what Rush said and it's what you repeated because you
can't think for yourself.
You think blacks are so stupid, they don't know which party is
their friend?
You need to get your head out of 1948, my friend.
...to think otherwise is wrong. How more
racist can you get?
ha ha
How much more racist could I get?
I could join the GOP, that's how much more racist I could get.
To put forth the notion that since they are Black, they MUST be Democrats;
Blacks don't want to empower the pro-lynching party - that makes
sense to me.
...and if Blacks vote conservative, they are "Uncle Toms" is the epitome of hypocrisy.
I agree.
Blacks who vote to suppress black rights are Uncle Toms.
It's the only thing you've said that makes sense.
Where is the inclusiveness of that?
No telling what you meant by that, but the reason racist Bush
nominated Clarence the Unqualified
is because he knew Clarence would vote against black rights every
time.
It's not about Clinton's cock, a theme you
have beat to death,
but about failed policy, and a dearth of
ideas from the the Left.
It's allllllllllllllllllll about Clinton's cock.
You guys have spent ten years on Clinton's cock and you need
to let go of it.
There must be something more fun for you guys to play
with - maybe a GI Joe doll?
Leave my name and e-mail address off this
should you publish it;
I've "enjoyed" my fill of the type of response's
this may generate from past postings.
Mark Latzko
I'll leave your address out, but I want people to know your letter
was real or they might think
I wrote that stupid, racist, load-of-crap diatribe myself just
to get some cheap laughs.