Suit questions Bush-Cheney claim to TX votes

                   By Mary McLachlin, Palm Beach Post
                   Tuesday, November 14, 2000

                   WEST PALM BEACH -- A federal lawsuit filed here Monday says Smirkendick
                   can't legally claim Texas' 32 electoral votes because both are inhabitants of the state --
                   a violation of the 12th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.

                   The amendment prohibits a state's electors from voting for both a president and vice president
                   from their state. Cheney has lived and worked in Texas for eight years but switched his voter
                   registration to Wyoming in July to try to avoid the constitutional conflict.

                   That's not good enough, says the suit filed by Lawrence A. Caplan, 42, a Boca Raton lawyer.
                   Merely moving one's voter registration doesn't meet the legal definition of being an "inhabitant,"
                   Caplan argues.

                   The suit says Cheney's primary residence is in Texas, his pre-nomination employment with
                   Dallas-based Halliburton Corp. was in Texas, he voted in Texas in every election cycle for
                   eight years until last week's election, he carries a Texas driver's license and all his federal
                   tax returns list him as a Texan.

                   A spokesman for the Bush campaign in Austin said Cheney still owns property in Wyoming.

                   "Dick Cheney grew up in Wyoming, he represented Wyoming in the U.S.
                   House of Representatives and he was a legally registered voter in Wyoming in
                   this election," GOP spokesman Ray Sullivan said.

                   Caplan's suit says Black's Law Dictionary defines inhabitant as "one who
                   resides actually and permanently in a given place and has his domicile there."
                   It cites case law saying "residence" is not the same as inhabitant, which
                   implies "a more fixed and permanent abode . . . imparting privileges and
                   duties to which a mere resident would not be subject."

                   "He hasn't met the test. Not even close," Caplan said. "It was just a cynical
                   attempt on their part to get around the Constitution, and they never thought in
                   a million years anyone would have called them on it."

                   Caplan said he decided to file the challenge because he felt the Bush
                   campaign's attempts to stop the recount were wrong. He said he isn't aligned
                   with either party or any protest group.

                   "My voter registration card says Democrat, but I voted for Ronald Reagan and
                   I listen to Rush Limbaugh," he said. "I don't always agree with him, but I enjoy
                   the show."

                   mary_mclachlin@pbpost.com

Privacy Policy
. .