I remember the first moment I felt like a journalist.
I was 22, and it was just before
classes started at Columbia University's Graduate
School of Journalism.
I was enrolled there, green with inexperience,
and I went to the admissions office.
There was a brusque, short-haired woman behind
the counter, and I guess I peppered her
with inquiries -- "When does this start? What
do I do next?" -- and finally she lowered her
glasses and said, "You ask a lot of questions."
"Sorry," I mumbled.
"It's all right. You're a reporter. You're supposed to."
I always loved Columbia for that. I loved how,
on the first morning of my reporting class,
I got a phone call at 6 a.m. telling me there
was a fire in Harlem and to get up there,
right now, and write a story about it.
And I loved the Speech.
The Speech comes on the J-School's first day.
It is given by the dean.
My dean spoke passionately about choosing the
news business.
He said you might not make much money, but you'd
have a sense
of purpose, and once in a while, you nail the
bad guys.
He said journalism required a "fire in the belly,"
a willingness to stand up to things
on principle alone. I loved that speech. And
I have always been proud of my alma mater.
Until last week.
The Great Off-The-Record Communicator
Last week, my alma mater allowed Al Gore, the
former vice president, to
begin teaching a class called Covering National
Affairs in the Information Age.
In an apparent agreement with Gore, the class
was to be off the record.
Huh?
How does a journalism school allow a class to
be off the record? How does a
school that teaches you to hold politicians accountable
and watch out for their spin,
then make a deal with a politician and weave
a spin of its own?
Students had to push past reporters and TV cameras
to get into the building.
They clearly knew it was a newsworthy event.
Yet the school was telling them to keep quiet?
What kind of training is that?
Afterward, in a scramble to regain its principles,
the dean, Tom Goldstein, issued a press release
on the school's Web site. A Web site! You couldn't
get the man on the phone. I tried. In fact,
in a radio show I do, I gathered a fellow alum,
Doron Levin, a business columnist for the Free Press,
and a former outstanding J-School professor,
Melvin Mencher, and we called the school and asked
to speak to Dean Goldstein. That's two working
alums and a professor emeritus.
Guess what happened? We were put off by a secretary
type and finally picked up
by someone else, who told us a statement would
be up soon ...on the Web site.
Great. Nothing like accountability from the school that teaches it.
Let's not make a deal
Now it's true. There are times in journalism where
you agree to go off the record
with a source. But that is usually to substantiate
an important part of a larger story.
Lectures by professors in public institutions
do not fall into that category.
And there is no larger story here. What could
Al Gore say that was so secret?
To me, this smells like the very celebrity swooning
that good journalists decry.
Columbia was so thrilled to put Al Gore in its
stable, it was willing to make a deal.
How embarrassing. It should have come to the students
and said: "Folks, we could
have had Gore lecture here. But he insisted that
what he say be off the record.
So we passed. That's a good lesson for what you're
going to face.
Tough choices. Hold your ground."
Instead, my alma mater caved like wet mud. The
Web statement defensively claimed,
"We never muzzled or gagged or forbade our students
from talking to anyone."
Oh yeah? When I interviewed one student from that
class, Andy Pergman,
he squirmed every time I asked what Gore said.
"The whole idea," Andy told me,
"was to keep (Gore's) conversation off the record."
Some idea. The kid was 22, just like me on that
first day, and something was happening
to him, too, but something quite different.
I was feeling like a journalist. He was being taught not to act like one.
Everybody is guilty here.
First, this would have a lot more impact if anybody had ever heard of
this guy.
Who is HE to call the others whores?
Does he have a record we can investigate to see if he's being honest?
Second, it looks like Al Gore successfully negotiated his demands with
the school.
Too bad when he negotiated terms for his presidential debates he wore
his pink tutu.
Third, what makes this guy think Columbia is some hotbed in integrity?
Sure, pre-Clinton, the press HAD some credibility, but why does he
think
Columbia has any credibility in today's whore America?