ON THIS SOLEMN day of remembrance, the words of Martin Luther King
Jr. will be heard again
in churches, at marches and at other ceremonies.
Few men inspired more revolutionary action, more courageous demand
for human rights and for the
dignity of humankind. Few overcame such implacable enemies.
King made us understand that equal protection under the law was everyone's
concern -- especially in a nation
like ours, one based on the power and sanctity of a single vote and
on the accountability of those who are elected.
Nothing could make the point more clearly today than the recent fiasco
in Florida.
The sheer number of irregularities in the Nov. 7 presidential balloting
there suggests a formidable and disturbing
assault on voting rights. Minority voters found themselves as far from
the ballot box on Election Day as they
were in the deepest, most blatantly racist, South.
As if poll taxes and rules about reading and understanding the Constitution
were still in force, every conceivable
pretext was employed to deny the vote to properly registered Americans
-- if widespread allegations are true.
Despite a record number of minority registrants, polling places in black
neighborhoods were strangely unprepared,
machinery was left outdated (even as it was modernized in other areas)
and all of this was done with a police
presence that raises disturbing questions. A thorough investigation
is critically important.
But so is support for that investigation from people of good faith and
moral courage. The nation, including both
major political parties and many voters, has paid too little attention
to the toll on minority voting rights in Florida.
It's almost as if many people believe this is a "black problem," to
be addressed only by African-Americans, if at all.
Here, King's words are useful: "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice
everywhere," he said in his famous
"Letter from the Birmingham Jail." "We are caught in an inescapable
network of mutuality, tied in a single
garment of destiny. Whatever affects one directly, affects all indirectly."
We must know that this observation challenges us today as sharply and urgently as when it was written in April 1963.
We remain in awe of King's words, humbled by the recollection of his
devotion -- and surely renewed
in our dedication to preserve and extend the progress he inspired.