Japanese infantry in Malaya. They greatly increased mobility by using bikes. |
Remembering the First Fight Against Fascism |
Australian infantry in North Arfrica |
January 13 | January 14 | January 15 | January 16 | January 17 | January 18 | January 19 1941 Archives
Special Editions
Map Links:East Front Dec '41 - Feb '42 | North Africa Nov 41-July 43 | Japanese Expansion The Soviet
offensive continues and intensifies. Heavy fighting is reported at Mozhaisk,
65 miles west of Moscow and the Soviet Central Front breaks the lines at
the border between the 2nd Panzer and 4th Armies,
taking Kirov. A reinforcement
convoy with 50 Hurricane fighters and desperately needed anti-aircraft
guns arrive in Singapore to bolster the British defenses. The ARCADIA
conference ends with the British and American strategists adopting the
“Germany first” strategy whereby the bulk of the effort in the war would
be concentrated on defeating Germany before Japan. Also, it was decided
that the first target for western offensive action would be to clear North
Africa to reduce the threat to Atlantic shipping. The Roosevelt administration prohibited US businesses from dealing with
1,800 European companies. Editor’s Note: This seems to have
had
little or no effect on the dealings of one Prescott
Bush,
father
of a President and grandfather of a resident. He would
not
stop dealing with the Nazi’s for nearly a year and then
the
government had to shut him down.
Japanese
forces attack on the western end of the Bataan lines against the 1st
US-Filipino Corps.
German
U-boats continue to operate off the US coast as the Panamanian tanker Norness
was
sunk of Cape Hatteras. In Byelorussia,
807 Jews were marched to a pit and gunned down at the village of Ushachi.
A similar incident occurred at Kublichi, where 925 Jews were slaughtered. Japanese forces attack along the entire Bataan front
taking heavy losses and making limited gains. The Japanese
15th Army crosses the Thai-Burma border. Japanese
forces break through the western US/Filipino defenses threatening the Bataan
position. US-Filipino forces take heavy losses. Free French
forces stormed the last German positions at Halfaya Pass, clearing the
Germans from eastern Libya. Allied forces took 5500 Germans prisoner in
the week long battle. The British
destroyer
Matabele was sunk while escorting merchants to Murmansk.
All 247 men of her crew were lost. Soviet
attacks in the Moscow area succeed in recapturing Mozhaisk, eliminating
the last potential threat to Moscow from ground attack. In the Crimean
Peninsula, German forces counterattack and take Feodosiaya from the Russian
marines. Japanese
forces cross the Muar River in Malaya and are 80 miles from Singapore. Rommel
receives a convoy of 46 desperately needed tanks to reinforce his depleted
forces at Benghazi just as they are preparing to abandon the port.
Those wishing
to contribute items. stories or comments should contact D.A.
Friedrichs |
The items
found in this section are comments from the editors of Project 60 and may
not necessarily reflect the opinions of bartcop.
Vietnam
and Afghanistan When the
“war against terrorism” began, many knowledgeable people warned that our
operations in Afghanistan would turn into another Vietnam. In the flush
of “victory”, much of the gloomy projections have been relegated to the
trash heap. However,
there are still some interesting comparisons that can be made. In the
early days of Vietnam, the United States inserted teams of Special Forces,
to assist in establishing good relations with the locals by helping with
village defense, health, and education programs. These operations were
highly successful in combating the influence of the Viet Cong. In the Afghan
war, a similar, and, like its predecessor, highly successful program is
well underway. Like Vietnam,
we are currently destroying any good will we have with the locals by blowing
stuff up. The old saying “we had to destroy the village in order to save
it” is alive and well and making a comeback in Afghanistan. However, we
have progressed a long way in 35 years. In Vietnam, we would send an infantry
platoon with Zippos into a village and burn it down. In Afghanistan, the
mud doesn’t burn, so we use precision-guided ordnance to turn peoples homes
into craters. The downside of this “improved” system, is that by the time
we get around to blowing up a house, a wedding party moves in and we blow
up a few score party-goers like we did at Qalaye
Niazi. The
biggest similarity between the two wars is the Pentagon briefings. The
goals and objectives are different but the level of lies and deceits have
not changed one bit. In Vietnam, the goal was to show progress by inflating
“body counts”. In our new, more compassionate world, we measure progress
by how many buildings we blow up in a sterile and non-violent manner, with
“minimal collateral damage”.In Vietnam
villages were called Viet Cong strongholds and in Afghanistan they are
called Al Qaeda compounds. In reality, these are places which were filled
with people, who wanted nothing more to try to scratch out a life for themselves
before we came and destroyed everything in their pitiful lives. The one
area that is glaringly different is how the US press is conducting operations
in the two wars. In Vietnam, the horrors and violence of war were brought
home. We saw that people, our soldiers, their soldiers, innocent people,
were horribly maimed and killed in war. Since Desert Storm, war for our
citizens has been converted into some sort of sick bloodless video game.
Our press today call sitting in a pentagon briefing journalism and don’t
bother to fact check the lies they are fed by the Administration. The India
Times has better, more accurate and more complete war coverage than the
New York Times. This is a sad and pathetic commentary on the health of
our Fourth Estate. Like Vietnam,
one of the reasons we got involved in the first place was to prop up a
corrupt and inept government, which we installed. In Afghanistan, we have
installed a government, but it remains to be seen just how corrupt and
inept it will be. Early signs, despite what is reported in the US media,
are not particularly encouraging. In Vietnam,
the primary reason for our presence was to stop Communism. In Afghanistan,
we have traded the bogyman of Communism for terrorism. Both were and are
vile and, if you will, evil. However, neither will be defeated by military
intervention. Economic stability, justice and self-determination are the
keys to defeating both of those enemies. In both
Vietnam and Afghanistan, the more compelling, and less acknowledged, reason
for intervention appears to be US business interests. In the 60’s it was
rubber and oil. Now it’s just oil and not even really oil, just a place
to put a pipeline that the Ruskies don’t control.
We seem to have an annoying habit of trading red blood for black gold. Previous Columns Want to Win - Think Before You Lash Out - "If we are serious about taking the war to the enemy, it is time to look ..." The First Fight Against Fascism - We must remember the Spanish Civil War also. Arguing Victory - "... Each nation who fought against fascist tyranny in WWII brought with it part of whole needed to defeat that evil..." War, Glory, Honor and Remembrance - "War is a brutal and savage insult on human society..." The
First Casualty... in time of war, those in power are even more
inclined to hide the truth, since that truth is often manifest in the most
gruesome and terrible acts. |