Why should you care?
Why would a guy (I refuse to call you a man) who helped the Black
Panthers
in the 60's be so down on black Americans now? Don't tell me
you're not;
I'm going to get to more things I found out about you.
First, let's get back to your "advertisement". You've been running
around
screaming that since most college papers you submitted it to
wouldn't run
it that "censorship is the weapon of the impotent. Apparently....
some
ideas are too dangerous for people to hear. It's pathetic." You've
been
trying to call this a First Amendment issue and claiming that
political
correctness from the Left is stifling free speech. I hope
you don't mind,
but I'm about to exercise some of my own First Amendment freedom.
First, any newspaper, college or otherwise, has every right not
to print
advertising that they feel is offensive. If you don't get it,
try to get a newspaper
to print an ad advocating legalizing child pornography or rape.
There is no court
that would find in your favor. David, your ad is offensive, ugly,
and hateful.
And aside from that, I haven't heard a peep out of you over someone
that tried
something similar by submitting pro-abortion ads to some right-wing
college papers
http://www.salonmag.com/news/feature/2001/04/27/censorship/index.html
Why isn't that "censorship", Dave? Because it's alright when
your boys do it.
Now about your "ad": You claim that black people should shut
up because
welfare is available and was set up to be reparations. This is
such
brainless bullshit I don't know where to start shooting it down.
Welfare was never reparations for slavery; it is there for everyone
who needs
help. It is an entitlement: anyone who's at the bottom of the
ladder is
"entitled" to it if they can prove they need it. Besides, isn't
it your
side that's always bitching about welfare being an insult to
blacks and
encouraging dependence? Which one is it Dave? My father worked
hard every
day of his short life and would have refused a handout to support
eight of
us. Welfare did us no good-we didn't need it and wouldn't have
taken it.
All black people are not on welfare, Dave.
Your "ad" says we should be grateful for all this country has
done for us.
We should bow down and kiss Massa's feet for dragging our ancestors
over
here in chains and treating them as less than human? We should
be grateful
for being denied employment, health care, education, and too
long a list
of everything else to go into here?
Fuck you.
You say about slavery "There Is No One Group That Benefited Exclusively
From Its Fruits". There was clearly one group that did not benefit:
the slaves.
You say "America Today Is A Multi-Ethnic Nation and Most Americans
Have No
Connection (Direct Or Indirect) To Slavery". But there is one
group that
does: the people you're harping about not being entitled to reparations.
You talk about the "millions of refugees from tyranny and genocide
who are
now living in America". But refugees had a choice-they wanted
to come
here. I am not aware of any other segment of this society that
was forced
to come here, that were dragged here forcibly in chains.
Fuck you again.
In the 60's you wrote respectfully of Marx and hung around with
Huey
Newton and the Black Panthers. You helped launch a Panther school,
knowing
of their violence and outlaw nature. Maybe you just thought it
was "cool"
to be part of what was happening or maybe being the Token White
Boy.
After Huey Newton was forced to flee the U.S. for Cuba, you also
had a
close relationship with his replacement, Elaine Brown. You had
her trust
to the point where when she asked you to recommend an accountant,
you sent
over Betty Van Patter. You had seen up close and from the inside
just how
far that group was willing to go, but there isn't any indication
that you
let Van Patter know. A month after she found some irregularities
in their
books, she was found floating in San Francisco Bay with her head
caved in.
There was not much doubt that the Panthers were behind it, meaning
that
you had some sort of, at least, indirect responsibility, since
you were one of them.
I bring this up because you claim that slavery ended so long
ago, no one
is responsible any more. And I'm reminding you of your claim
that "most
Americans have no connection to slavery". There are no Black
Panthers any
more either, but as much as you wouldn't want to admit it, you
have a
connection to at least one person that was robbed of her life,
probably at
their hands. The passage of time won't erase that.
Later, you did a complete 180 degree turn and became a conservative.
And
not just a conservative, but an Ultra one. The bombs you're throwing
now
aren't at buildings, but at black Americans. You have a tendency
to
associate with the fringes and take up the worst of what they
do. You're
trying to say that because the Black Panthers did bad things,
every one
who is or was a liberal was bad. It's there for anyone to see
at
http://www.frontpagemag.com/index.htm
or your regular hate-fest in
http://www.salonmag.com
Now, let's forget about reparations for slavery. Your insistence
that
reparations for slavery is dishonest anyway. Many people who
are talking
about reparations aren't tying them to slavery. You forgot to
mention that
in your web site or your "ad". When you try to change the focus
of a debate
onto something else, it says that your own position is too weak
to defend.
But back to the point. Let's say you're right about reparations
for
slavery. What about all the bullshit coming down since? I saw
you on the
Fake News Network "debating" Dorothy Benton Lewis from Blacks
for
Reparations in America. You said reparations or even an apology
aren't
needed because "at Abraham Lincoln's second inaugural, he said
that
slavery was 'an offense to God' and he also pointed out that
the terrible
war had punished those responsible. The South was destroyed,
it was burned
right to the sea by Sherman. All the plantations were taken away
and since
then Americans have made a tremendous effort to make up whatever
deficiencies there have been." Then you start to spout your crap
about
trillions in welfare, affirmative action, etc.
Then Benton Lewis tried to point out that affirmative action
and all the other
remedies your side has done everything in their power to take
away from us
wasn't set up as reparations for slavery; they were to right
current wrongs.
That's what you don't talk about: the wrongs since slavery ended.
They just took different forms.
Have you ever heard of Project 100,000? It's one of the Vietnam
War's
dirty little secrets. I'll quote from Myra MacPherson's book
Long Time
Passing: Vietnam and the Haunted Generation: Project 100,000"....
instituted in 1966 and billed as a Great Society program, was
a vehicle for
channeling poor, mostly Southern and black youths to Vietnam's
front lines."
It was there to "recruit and 'rehabilitate' 100,000 youths annually
who had
previously been rejected for failing to meet the armed services
mental or
physical requirements."
It was called the "Moron Squad". The Defense Department found
that the
killed-in-action ratio of Project 100,000 was "almost exactly
twice as high
as other units. The Army took recruits with IQs as low as 62.
The minimum
passing composite score on the armed-forces qualifications test
had been 30
out of 100. Project 100,000 took those who scored below
10." The purpose
of sending them over was to keep from having to end student deferments
or
send the Reserves over. Granted, not all the people who died
were blacks,
but most were. And by not sending the Reserves, it helped keep
the
George W. Bushes safe and sound.
How about the Tuskegee Syphilis Study? True, Clinton did apologize
for
that, but the fact remains that for 40 years poor sharecroppers
in Alabama
were denied treatment by the U.S. Public Health Service. They
were told
they were in fact being treated for "bad blood" but were secretly
guinea
pigs sacrificed to study syphilis.
There's more I won't go into and certainly more I don't know
about. But
how about the fact that for decades black people have been essentially
cannon fodder and lab experiments?
How about Jim Crow? What about "separate but equal" schools?
"Whites Only"
restaurants, drinking fountains and restrooms? Racial profiling?
The CIA
providing crack cocaine to the inner cities? A man in Bangladesh
having a
better chance of living to see 40 than a black man in New York
City?
I'll quote from the Washington Post from March 28 for something
else
I learned about you: "Crowds of boisterous young Republicans
gathered
outside the U.S. Supreme Court as the justices considered the
election
case last December. Waving signs, chanting "Hey, hey, ho, ho,
Al Gore has
to go!" the demonstrators were a '60s flashback rendered in bow
ties and
plaid. And Horowitz was their Che, their Mao, their Abbie Hoffman.
The
activists passed Horowitz's e-mailed "war room" briefings back
and forth.
They carried his books. And several credited his teachings with
inspiring
what columnist Paul Gigot celebrated as the "bourgeois riot"
in Miami that
persuaded Dade County election officials to suspend their recount."
Along with helping put someone in the White House who is no friend
of black
Americans, you helped take away their votes which would have
kept him out.
America has been one big, long party that black people haven't
been
invited to except as the help, and sometimes the main course.
And you
serve the people who want to keep it that way.
And fuck you again.
With all this crap you're pulling, you have a pretty thin skin.
Responding to an article you wrote in Salon
http://www.salon.com/news/col/horo/1999/08/16/naacp/index.html
you were called a bigot by Jack E. White by Time Magazine
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/articles/0,3266,29787,00.html
and threatened to sue
http://www.salon.com/news/feature/1999/08/25/response/index.html
but never did. There's too much evidence.
You are a bigot, Dave, and a whore too.
Forgot reparations and apologies. I would be happy to forget
the
whole thing for you just to kiss my hairy, black ass.
I mean this sincerely,
Isaac Peterson