Enslave your girls and women, harbor anti-U.S. terrorists and destroy
every vestige of civilization in your homeland,
and the Bush administration will embrace you. All that matters is that
you line up as an ally in the drug war,
the only international cause that this nation still takes seriously.
That's the message sent with the recent gift of $43 million to the Taliban
rulers of Afghanistan, the most virulent
anti-American violators of human rights in the world today. The gift,
announced last Thursday by Secretary of State
Colin Powell, in addition to other recent aid, makes the United States
the main sponsor of the Taliban and rewards
that "rogue regime" for declaring that opium growing is against the
will of God. So, too, by the Taliban's estimation,
are most human activities, but it's the ban on drugs that catches this
administration's attention.
Never mind that Osama bin Laden still operates the leading anti-American
terror operation from his base in Afghanistan,
from which, among other crimes, he launched two bloody attacks on American
embassies in Africa in 1998.
Sadly, the Bush administration is cozying up to the Taliban regime at
a time when the United Nations, at U.S. insistence,
imposes sanctions on Afghanistan because the Kabul government will
not turn over Bin Laden.
The war on drugs has become our own fanatics' obsession and easily trumps
all other concerns. How else could we come
to reward the Taliban, who has subjected the female half of the Afghan
population to a continual reign of terror in a country once considered
enlightened in its treatment of women?
At no point in modern history have women and girls been more systematically
abused than in Afghanistan, where in the
name of madness masquerading as Islam, the government in Kabul obliterates
their fundamental human rights. Women may
not appear in public without being covered from head to toe with the
oppressive shroud called the burkha, and they may
not leave the house without being accompanied by a male family member.
They've not been permitted to attend school
or be treated by male doctors, yet women have been banned from practicing
medicine or any profession for that matter.
The lot of males is better if they blindly accept the laws of an extreme
religious theocracy that prescribes strict rules
governing all behavior, from a ban on shaving to what crops may be
grown. It is this last power that has captured
the enthusiasm of the Bush White House.
The Taliban fanatics, economically and diplomatically isolated, are
at the breaking point, and so, in return for a pittance
of legitimacy and cash from the Bush administration, they have been
willing to appear to reverse themselves on the growing
of opium. That a totalitarian country can effectively crack down on
its farmers is not surprising. But it is grotesque for a
U.S. official, James P. Callahan, director of the State Department's
Asian anti-drug program, to describe the Taliban's
special methods in the language of representative democracy: "The Taliban
used a system of consensus-building,"
Callahan said after a visit with the Taliban, adding that the Taliban
justified the ban on drugs "in very religious terms."
Of course, Callahan also reported, those who didn't obey the theocratic edict would be sent to prison.
In a country where those who break minor rules are simply beaten on
the spot by religious police and others are stoned
to death, it's understandable that the government's "religious" argument
might be compelling. Even if it means, as Callahan
concedes, that most of the farmers who grew the poppies will now confront
starvation. That's because the Afghan economy
has been ruined by the religious extremism of the Taliban, making the
attraction of opium as a previously tolerated quick
cash crop overwhelming.
For that reason, the opium ban will not last unless the United States
is willing to pour far larger amounts of money
into underwriting the Afghan economy.
As the Drug Enforcement Administration's Steven Casteel admitted, "The
bad side of the ban is that it's bringing their
country -- or certain regions of their country -- to economic ruin."
Nor did he hold out much hope for Afghan farmers
growing other crops such as wheat, which require a vast infrastructure
to supply water and fertilizer that no longer exists
in that devastated country. There's little doubt that the Taliban will
turn once again to the easily taxed cash crop of opium
in order to stay in power.
The Taliban may suddenly be the dream regime of our own drug-war zealots,
but in the end this alliance will prove
a costly failure. Our long sad history of signing up dictators in the
war on drugs demonstrates the futility of building
a foreign policy on a domestic obsession.