804mail

Subject: "I don't mind a performer being gay"

C'mon Bartcop, don't start showing anti-gay attitude. I like you and your site too much.
I don't think Perry needs anybody's permission to be gay (he is not).
I'm not gay and I don't think I am a super sensitive person but when
I read too many comments like that, I get nervous.

Maybe you meant to say flamboyant.
BTW, I thought Joan looked hot.

Dave

Dave, thanks for writing.
It brings up questions:

There seemed to be more overly gay acts than usual that night.
You think it was wrong for me to bring that up?
Do I not have a right to comment on something like that?

If the show featured many older acts, and I pointed that out, maybe with
a Depends joke, would that be proof of my anti-senior citizen bias?

Or, ...what if I was gay and said, "Damn, that MTV show was loaded with firm ass,"
would that have displayed an unhealthy bias towards gays?

Or, ...what if I returned from Las Vegas and said, "There were a lot of Arabs there."
To me, that's like, "There were a lot of Palm trees there."

Get back to me, or anybody, cause I'd like to explore this, if it's a thing.

...you say Perry Farrell's not gay?

Those clothes, that dancing, ...and he's not gay?

From: rachael@wnonline.net

Subject: Missle defense

Remember the FIRST car Henry Ford built: the Rolls-Royce Silver Ghost ?

Remember the FIRST airplane the Wright Bros. flew: the Super-Sonic Transport ?

No, you DON'T !

You see, dummie, you have to start AT THE BEGINNING !! Duh !!!

Pete, thanks for the softballs.
People are going to think I invented you to make myself look good.

When Henry Ford tried to move a carriage with an engine, it almoist had to work.
When the Wright Brothers flew that first plane, they knew it would work.

Hitting a bullet with a bullet is almost impossible, unless it has a beacon on it.

And in the Ford and Wright cases, we didn't have to trade health care for 80 million seniors
to see if maybe the damn thing might work, someday, perhaps.

When the military FIRST developed the ability to shoot down AIRPLANES with missiles,
a MUCH slower moving target than another missile, they actually attached homing devices to the
airplanes to help them identify and track the target. This is a first step in a DEVELOPMENT program
that LEADS TO the ultimate goal of independant target acquisition.

So - why didn't the Pentagon spokesman mention the FACT that the test was rigged?

Now, in the future, before you go running off at the mouth you should actually investigate the way
SCIENTISTS develop the amazing devices we all take for granted. You are misleading (again) the
BarfCrap Faithful by accusing our scientists of "cheating" (why am I surprised ?). What you are guilty
of is the same thing you accuse Bush of, and that is: only telling part of the story, or lying.

Odds are you hear the beacon story right here at bartcop.com
The "We love the boy king" networks didn't mentiuon it, did they?
They just told us what a "great success" the missle test was.

Since even you agree the test was "rigged," that means I helped YOU
get the truth that the networks are trying to hide,

It's a crazy world when the comedy treehouse is more honest than the networks.

So, now explain WHY you are so much "better" than Bush when you are apparently
engaged in the very same kind of misleading rhetoric ? Hmmm ???

as ever, your pal,
Peet-o

You can scream "misleading" all you want, but the beacon was there - you admit it.
If the Pentagon would have admitted the truth, we wouldn't be having this conversation.

Next time you write, can you be a little tougher?

From: jl@dejazzd.com

Subject: Internet radio

If you consider on line radio broadcasts, please consider a method that
any internet user can receive, regardless of operating system they choose to use.
Please do not use a Microsoft product that only works with people using
Microsoft supported operating systems.

thanks for your consideration

joe lerch

Joe, I don't know Smirk about operating systems.
I just plan to be ringmaster of the circus, but I'll do what I can.

From: Gonzowerke@erols.com

Subject: The depths your enemies sink to, or is imitation really flattery?

Dear Bartcop,

Thank you for being one of the true lights in the murky night known as politics, Amurrican style!

To make a long story short, have you seen Bartcop.net?
I ran across it after typing Bartcop in my search engine.
This is some obviously some lame freeper who, now that Clinton's cock is out of the limelight,
needs something to focus his anger over his erectile dysfunction at. That would be you.

ha ha

At least he was nice enough to link to your page!

Swinging a big one too,

Chris Gagnon
Pissed-off Centrist

Yeah, that's our friend The Bird.
He has some psychological problems that make him act out his fantasies
as a completely different person to shield him from reality - kinda sad...

We wont need to see the glory of his coming
No longer will we suffer warheads humming
The dogma that exists will be replaced
Including beads and book and shrouds that have a face
While some have waited over 2000 years for peace
And yet the love they claim to have finds no release
The prophet spoke but all the words are misconstrued
The time for almighty powers to be abated is due
History reveals the ugly truth
Sad mindwashed eye blinded in its youth
One day grown older it may see what must be done
True love, not religion for everyone

by glenn roberts

fade out: bartcop swingin hammer like a pendulum do
bustin up repukelicans two by two

From: avedon@cix.compulink.co.uk

Subject: Clinton cleared...but not by the press

Something that bugs me about this story, and just about any story on
Clinton being cleared - as usual - of phoney charges: They talk about a
lack of "proof" rather than a lack of evidence. But they have no evidence!

They never do.

But they always make it sound like they just couldn't catch the slippery bastard,
rather than that they never had a reason to investigate him in the first place.
There is not, and never has been, a shred of evidence that there was _anything_
wrong with the Rich pardon.

- A

http://www.ny1.com/ny/TopStories/SubTopic/index.html?topicintid=1&subtopic

I understand how the retraction never gets the ink of the wild-ass accusation,
but you'd think they'd learn after a hundred false alarms.

From: paintby1@pacbell.net

Subject: Stephie's book...

BC...

Swear to God dude, I saw that traitorous little bastards book, at a store in Chico, CA...

>> I'm not moving anywhere for anybody.
>> Keep your money, buy George Stephanopolous's book with it

at the EVERYTHINGS A DOLLAR STORE. Having only a buck in my shorts and needing something
to read I opted for THE AUTOBIOGRAPHY OF LARRY SANDERS over Georgie's book.

thepaintboy

Paintboy, I'll bet you got a good book!
I 'bout cried when Larry Sanders went off the air.
No show was ever like that before, and so far, none since.
I miss that show a lot... (sniff...)

But that Steffie book?

Back-stabbing, knife-weilding, ungrateful, snot-nosed, punk-ass mother-effer...
I'd like to bust a cap - not shoot him, just bust a few of his perfectly-capped teeth
(that he paid for with his 30 pieces of silver) with a uppercut while saying "Bill says hi, Judas!"