From: Michael.Lordi@axacs.com
1. Her name is Sarah SilverMAN, not Silverton
2. Bill Maher let her get screamed at, but
in other shows he asked black
women and men what makes the term "nigger" opffensive
if they use it themselves
3. It seems to me that it is no longer the
CONTEXT you say something in,
but just the word itself. In other words,
if I was to be heard saying "Some guy called him a nigger",
I would be grouped in with the same bunch who
actually CALLED them a nigger.
4. NBC refused to show an episode of LAW
& ORDER after it was originally aired because it
depicted the wildings that happened in NY during
the Puerto Rican parade. The minority leadership
decided that it portrayed Puerto Ricans and Blacks
bad, so they protested and NBC caved. Why?
Thisevent actually happened! It wasn't
like NBC made the story up! And besides, the actual criminal
in the end turned out to be white. But you didn't
hear about that portion.
The problem is that when a group makes noise,
people don't use logic anymore, they automatically
don't want the bad press, so they cave.
And that my friends is censorship. Just because one person
doesnt like one thing, should all of us be deprived?
Isn't that what an on/off switch is for?
I mean, I belong to the NRA and I smoke, but
I still read Bartcop everyday.
C'mon people lighten up!
From: (login TheLiberalMedia)
(from the discussion boards, I don't have
an e-mail for him/her)
Bartcop is WAY off on this david spade thing....
I watched PI last night and BC is WAY off on David Spade.
He was not doing some
cry baby spoiled white boy thing. He made a very good and very valid point
about the glaring inconstancy
between saying that we are all equal and should all be treated the
same, yet having things
like The Latin Grammy Awards.
On one hand many of these
groups have preached inclusion and desegregation for years and years,
but now many of them
are also doing things like creating black only or latin only events. They
get a
pass on this, while
if some group did a whites only event, that wouldn;t fly.
A good example is the
protesting of white people moving into Harlem.
It is self-imposed segregation
and there is a HUGE double standard.
Picture two scenarios….
First you have a group
of black people protesting the gentrification of their neighborhoods in
Harlem.
Basically saying they
don’t want white people coming in and messing with their property values.
Second you have a group
of KKK members protesting blacks moving into their neighborhoods. Basically
saying they don’t want
black people coming in and messing with their property values.
Which one is viewed as
more racist and more hateful? They are essentially the exact same thing,
the
same reaction based
on the same racial fear and prejudice. Yet there is a clear double standard
in
how the actions of each
group are viewed. Can you imagine the outrage that we’d see if a bunch
of
white guys were protesting
Colon Powell setting up offices in Manhattan? There would be a shit storm
of controversy, whereas
the black protesters in Harlem hardly caused anybody to raise an eyebrow.
Spade was making a valid
point about this inconsistency. If a black guy says he has black pride,
that’s
ok, but if a white guy
says he has white pride, he’s instantly branded a racist. That assumption
is, in
and of itself, a racial
stereotype against whites.
I agree with everything
else BC said about the show,
but he really missed
where spade was coming from.
http://www.geocities.com/theliberalmedia