Subject: More on the WTC Hi Bart, it's Marguerite from NYC. 1727°C is not hot enough to do to the towers what we saw done to them. Even if it was how hot the fires were. The fires
burned out/were burning out, quickly.
That is why South Tower had to come down first.
The fire was burning out.
A steel stove is not destroyed by the fire within
it.
1727°C, even if burning for more than an hour
or hour and a half,
The steel frame itself acts as an heat sink. And wicks the heat away from the fire location. Even one strong piece of evidence is enough to
show it.
Bart, look at the evidence yourself. Read Steven Jones' peer reviewed report. You know these criminals have the balls to do
it.
Below is a correspondence I had on the technical
details of the collapse,
Of course his paper is good too ;) The issue is technical, but quite clear. The buildings
were taken down by some kind of explosive action.
BTW, you still owe me a visit when you get to
NYC.
Marguerite
|
|