"Police radio broadcasts 'This was a terrorist attack. Notify the Pentagon.' 9:08 a.m." ('Daily News' (New York),
12 September 2001, NEWS SECTION; Pg. 24: THE TRAGIC TIMELINE, our emphasis)
[Emperor's Clothes note: This was after the first and second planes had struck the WTC Towers.
The third plane is said to have hit the Pentagon 35 minutes later, at 9:43 am.

"In Sarasota, Fla., Bush was reading to children in a classroom at 9:05 a.m. when his chief of staff,
Andrew Card, whispered into his ear. The president briefly turned somber before he resumed reading.
He addressed the tragedy about a half-hour later. " ['AP' Sept 12, 2001, our emphasis]

"President Bush listened to 18 Booker Elementary School second-graders read a story about a girl's pet goat
Tuesday before he spoke briefly and somberly about the terrorist attacks." -- Sarasota Herald-Tribune,
September 12, 2001 Wednesday, A SECTION; Pg. A20 HEADLINE: Bush hears of attack while visiting
Booker [Emperor's Clothes note: The school was Emma E. Booker Elementary School in Sarasota, Fla.]

We are not soothsayers.

We cannot say with certainty what happened Sept.11 - that is, what really happened, behind the scenes.

But the following report from the semi-official 'N.Y. Times' makes it clear that either Americans are being
lied to by the those in the highest places - which if true has the gravest implications - or Washington's
New World Order is ruled by criminally negligent morons.

In an analysis of the 9-11 nightmare, which we have been preparing, one of the things we asked is: how
could the so-called third plane stay in the air, hijacked, for almost an hour after two other hijacked planes
had struck the WTC Towers, and not be seen and intercepted by U.S. air defense forces?
How could it fly to the Midwest, turn around and fly back to Washington, to the Pentagon, undisturbed?

Apparently it occurred to someone On High that ordinary folks might harbor such thoughts, hence the following article has been published by the 'N.Y. Times,' with the apparent intention of defusing such doubts.

But the cure is worse than the doubts. It is one thing to say the plane was not spotted. But to say, as this article does, that the plane was spotted, that it was tracked from the time it turned back from the Midwest until it struck the Pentagon, and yet nothing was done because they "didn't know what to do" - this is simply unbelievable.

* If they knew the plane was coming, why didn't they force it down and failing that, shoot it down? Before you say "They wouldn't do a thing like that," note that whoever edited the 'N.Y. Times' article left in the following damning sentences, regarding the fourth plane, the one that, we are told, crashed in Pennsylvania:

"Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defense secretary, said today that the Pentagon had been tracking that plane and could have shot it down if necessary; it crashed about 35 minutes after the Pentagon crash." (From article posted below)

So if they "could have shot" down the fourth plane, why didn't they shoot down the third? Why didn't they shoot down the first three, or at least planes # two and three? Once they "knew" these were suicide hijackings what were they waiting for them to do, hit the WTC Towers and the Pentagon? Or a nuclear power plant?

And why, if they were really confused about what to do, why, after the Commander in Chief was informed about what was happening, didn't he immediately convene an emergency meeting to discuss the issue? Why did he keep reading to children and listening to stories about goats while the 3rd plane flew towards Washington?

Moreover, knowing that two other planes had hit highly visible symbols of US power, if they knew a third plane was heading for Washington, wouldn't it be reasonable to assume that the next target would be a symbol of US power in Washington? Why then didn't they order the evacuation of the most sensitive public buildings? And wouldn't that mean, right at the top of the list, the Pentagon. Yet according to news reports:

"WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Up to 800 people may have died Tuesday when a hijacked commercial airliner was crashed into the Pentagon, officials said.

"Firefighters were still battling a fire on the west side of the 29-acre, 6 million-square-foot building late Tuesday, more than 12 hours after the crash. Washington hospitals reported 71 people injured, some severely, and another 100 to 800 were still listed as missing and possibly dead late Tuesday. " (CNN at http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/09/11/pentagon.terrorism/)

So what do we have here? Either criminal negligence beyond belief, and that includes the Commander in Chief, who hearing that planes are destroying the country focuses on goats, or b) the 'N.Y. Times' piece is a lie, that is a cover story to explain a hole stupidly left in the original cover story - the huge gap between when the 3rd plane would have had to turn around, and the time it hit the Pentagon. And if the 'N.Y. Times' is lying, then we know: those who fed it this lie are guilty of conspiracy. They are people in high places and they are directly involved in the murder of God knows how many people in N.Y. as well as the 800 casualties the media speaks of in Washington because either they planned this or wanted to let it happen and therefore did nothing to stop the second, and certainly the third planes.

So there you have it - either criminal neglignece, including Mr. Bush who reads about goats while his countrymen are slaughtered, or treason.

Mr. Bush has called for bringing those responsible to justice. Let us begin at home.   -- Jared Israel