Current Issue
Back Issues
BartBlog
 Subscribe to BartBlog Feed
How to Read BartCop.com
Members ( need password)
Subscribe to BartCop!
Contact Us
Advertise With Us
Link to Us
Why Donate?
BartCop:
Entertainment
The Forum  - bartcopforum@yahoo.com
Live CHAT
The Reader
Stickers
Poster Downloads
Shirts & Shots
BartCop Hotties
More Links
BFEE Scorecard
Perkel's Blog
Power of Nightmares
Clinton Fox Interview
Part 1, Part 2
Money Talks
Cost of Bush's greed
White Rose Society
Project 60
Chinaco Anejo
EVEN MORE LINKS

 
Web BartCop.com









Search Now:
 
In Association with Amazon.com

Link Roll
Altercation
American Politics Journal
Atrios
Barry Crimmins
Betty Bowers
Buzzflash 
Consortium News 
Daily Howler
Daily Kos
Democatic Underground 
Disinfotainment Today 
Evil GOP Bastards
Faux News Channel 
Greg Palast
The Hollywood Liberal 
Internet Weekly
Jesus General
Joe Conason 
Josh Marshall
Liberal Oasis
Make Them Accountable 
Mark Morford 
Mike Malloy 
Political Humor - About.com
Political Wire
Randi Rhodes
Rude Pundit 
Smirking Chimp
Take Back the Media 
Whitehouse.org
More Links

 





Locations of visitors to this page

Gates Agrees, Bush's Wars Were Nuts
  
by Robert Parry

 Link 

When DefSec Robert Gates told West Point cadets that you’d have to be crazy to commit U.S. troops
to wars like those in Iraq and Afghanistan, media commentators quickly detected a slap at his predecessor,
Donald Rumsfeld, who oversaw those conflicts.

But what about everyone else in the U.S. power structure who went along with those insane and bloody wars?
Shouldn’t such people – whether they acted out of ideology or opportunism – be kept away from levers of
authority that might get others killed?

For instance, what about the top editors at the Washington Post, the New York Times and a host of other
establishment publications and TV outlets who hopped on the pro-war bandwagon and mocked anyone
who suggested that negotiations or some less violent means might be preferable?

If even a long-time war hawk like Gates recognizes the obvious – that committing U.S. land forces to such
conflicts is nuts – then what’s to be said about the Post’s editorial-page editor Fred Hiatt or the Times’
executive editor Bill Keller or a host of other senior media executives and pundits who endorsed the wars
and have suffered no dents in their shiny careers?

These hot-shots got the biggest stories of their lives dead wrong – and countless thousands have paid with
their lives, not to mention the $1 trillion-plus drain on the U.S. Treasury – yet they float along as if nothing
happened. Amazingly, Keller even got a promotion to the top editorial job at the Times after he was
bamboozled by President George W. Bush’s bogus case for invading Iraq.


Is America addicted to wars?
We just hop from one war to the next.

Why are so many Americans eager to volunteer to go into combat?
I guess wars are just too profitable to pass up?
 

 

  Back to Bartcop.com

Send e-mail to Bart
 



Privacy Policy
. .