|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |
Subject: The World's #2 Scientist in 9/11 Research
Bart, thanks for printing my letter yesterday.
You are a strong man, and I appreciate it. You're
gonna get emails.
The thing about the CIA, infinite budget and years
is true in a general
sense and in one specific sense. You have
to find an organization
with money and access to advanced weapons. It
might have been
the CIA, but most of the theories that the CIA
were involved include
the plane crash plus bombs scenario.
Most 9/11 truthers think that the CIA was involved
because they can't
think of any other way that the planes could
have evaded interception
and the security of the WTC breached for long
enough to wire the buildings
with bombs. Neither of these happened, and most
truthers have a mental
breakdown when confronted with this.
How the WTC was destroyed is connected
100% to who did it, like
every other crime. Steven Jones, David Ray Griffin,
and Richard Gage
have presented a superficially plausible theory
of bombs plus planes
that falls apart when seriously scrutinized.
No images of "molten metal
in the basement of the WTC" have ever been found,
and worse for
their theory, many people survived the dust cloud
that rolled down
the building (so it couldn't have been extremely
hot).
Remember the people they found trapped in Stairwell
B of WTC 2
after a day or two? The electrical weapon missed
that spot.
Cascading showers of molten metal would have
killed them, and
were not evident in the videos of the final destruction
of the buildings
anyway.
Science doesn't allow you to prove anything. It
just lets you disprove
things. Planes? Disproved. Bombs? Disproved.
Electrical weapon?
Still out there. Not disproved.
I would dump the electrical weapon theory the
moment it was disproved.
9/11 truthers don't attempt to disprove this
theory (because the vast
majority of them are not scientists and do not
know exactly what constitutes
disproving anything). All they do is name-calling,
which comes from
their anxiety about not really knowing what happened
and having wasted
years of their lives pursuing a faulty theory.
Remember when I was interested in TV Video Fakery
for a while?
It takes a large amount of scientific integrity
to know when you've
been going down a false trail and do what's required
to correct yourself,
as I did in that case.
Highest regards,
Tracy
Tracy Postert, PhD
The World's #2 Scientist in 9/11 Research
To discover who is #1 please visit and extensively
examine the blog of Dr. Judy Wood. http://drjudywood.com