|
How Billy
Random Sees it
Big media is up to the usual and so are the pathetic
Dems;
What's with all the non-stop HOUR after HOUR
coverage of the dimmest of all the Kennedy brothers in his grandstanding
endorsement? (other than creating party division and another republican
administration in 2008)
GE (MSNBC) stopped their non stop coverage of
'how to be a pedophile' and 'how to act in jail because you'll be there
soon' shows for non stop adoration on the 'liberal lion,' or as JFK used
to call Ted, "the gay illiterate" (gay as in happily irresponsible)...and
yes, dim.
Suddenly, they LOVE 'liberals'??? yeh right.
If they were news outlets they'd give some context
about Ted's legacy. (bringing us Reagan and a long list of other actual
crimes)
Let's try to remember that in addition to being
expelled from Harvard for cheating, ( & paying someone else to cheat
for him) the dimmest of the nine, who was shepherded into the Senate by
his kingmaker daddy Joe, the same daddy who made sure his military service
was in Paris instead of Korea, and got him out of countless drunk driving
pops; not to mention the horror of Chappaquiddick where that girl was alive
and scratching the shit out of the roof of the car she drowned in, while
Ted walked past a firehouse in silence, leaving the scene of an accident,
unscathed, on the way to another cover-up.
(His wife Joan was pregnant at the time
& suffered a miscarriage and went on to alcoholism and mental illness
herself in the aftermath)
NO it's not a digression, and IS relevant, because
he's a national figure talking about values and appropriating the 'passing
the torch' to a new generation in his support for the new Obamalot, so
a little history lesson for the new voters who might appreciate some context,
is in order. You know if Ted had endorsed Hillary, this would not have
been played over and over and over with such reverence. I don't want to
spoil anybody's pony party, but that's the way it really is.
I haven't the time, and you haven't the room
to publish all his horrifying irresponsible personal and 'professional'
history, but peeps should be a little concerned about the true nature of
Camelot, Teddy-style... Does the "new politics" call for any research or
knowledge of contemporary political history anywhere along the way? Not
so far. Where have I heard this "uniter not a divider" stuff before. Hmm.
Most significantly in my always very humble opinion,
is the bastard CHALLENGED A SITTING DEMOCRATIC PRESIDENT in 1980, helping,
in no small regard, to give us Ronald Reagan, Barack's inspiration and
the killer of our Republic, which is on it's last bit of life support right
now, and Russert and Matthews and the killer crew, who could not hide their
pale frightened hurt faces when Hillary won her primaries and caucuses,
are digging in and happy again, propping up the candidate who has yet to
see the real-deal tussle up close and personal.
In 1980, dim drunk boy Ted been sitting pretty
in the Senate for almost twenty years, so at some point, excuses for drunken
rampages and destroying other people's lives and children, including his
ex-wife's, has to come into play. But war loving, propaganda spreading
GE company (who makes fortunes on war while showing you that pretty peacock
icon) is suddenly in non stop admiration of "the Liberal Lion"...run that
speech again and again and again. Nothing about those 5 American kids who
died that day. I repeat, NOTHING about those 5 American kids who died that
day. Just Brittany and Ted and the magic pony.
Talk about fairy tales...ooops, now I'm an automatic
racist, huh?? because I dare suggest vetting the pony candidate and the
over-entitled embarrassment that endorsed him, getting dozens of hours
of free commercials for Obamalot, instead of some sense of equal time,
would be in order. Obama has his Dr. King lines in all of his speeches
and works the race angle when it's to his political advantage, and when
it isn't, everyone else is a sneaky racist for trying to hold him accountable.
Big Media says that's ok. so it must be. and so it is, Amen. Those of us
who marched in the street and faced angry armed cops are out of the argument
now because we're suddenly 'part of the "OLD" divisive politics...oh man.
what a crock.
Hillary was giving a hell of a speech and openly
taking questions in Nashville, the night of the S. Carolina primary, but
that was not newsworthy apparently. She took every question and spoke without
teleprompters. Try that sometime Barack.
But no media coverage on that, (thank goodness
for C-Span) Everything has to be orchestrated, to further divide the party,
and the country, and assure the Repub victory, that every Dem thinks impossible
at this point. The blogs, now no better than the major media it once was
clearly opposed to. (now it's the prepping ground for trying to get INTO
the big media, (big bucks, big exposure) or, in several cases, actually
IS the big Conservative media in disguise, like the Arianna shill and her
mega financed shell game)
Kennedy could not have helped bring us Reagan
more, with his traitorous moves against Carter, and here he is helping
to split the party again. He could have stepped up and supported his party
and the country, but he wanted the big prize, lost two dozen primaries,
but 10 or so, just enough to cut the bleeding Carter while he was down
and Reagan/Bush were already illegally selling weapons to Iran in a coup.
I think Parry was great at uncovering a lot of this but now he want a pony,
and they are expensive. He's done his time in the trenches and he wants
some payback apparently.
Like Nader, he takes a once stunningly important
career of service into a divisive Hate Hillary fest, just like the pros.
Ted's entitled to his endorsement of course,
but fascinating that it gets dozens and dozens of repeats and respectful
media coverage by the very forces that took away Gore's victory in 2000.
Like duhhh...
He does not speak for Bobby or Jack, and dear
Caroline did not know her Dad, but her teenagers want to be excited (they
already have ponies but heck, one more can't hurt).
Gosh, sorry to intervene in the 'history making'
baloney of Obamalot; but I've seen all this crap before, and here it comes
again. 46 years in the Senate and we still don't have health care, but
Senators and the filthy rich (and those riches are filthy) don't need to
worry about such things. We pay their health insurance and they are never
denied. Cheney would be dead six times now if it weren't for unlimited
coverage. A real American would be dead and if poor, spat upon in the crematory.
If Ted had gone to jail for a few months
instead of having his sentence suspended after countless drunk driving
incidents, maybe that girl would still be alive. But rich folk walk. And
that ain't gonna change, and Obama has shown me nothing so far, except
he never speaks without two clear teleprompters feeding him the lines.
One to the right, read read talk out loud, one
to the left, read read talk out loud, and back again, thus giving the impression
that he is actually saying words he wrote, and that he is actually looking
at the adoring crowds instead of reading the same ol' politics of division
off of a transparent clear prompter.
Thin skinned amateur working the crowds? Maybe
he's better than that, but how would anybody know? The Back Street Boys
were very popular for awhile too. Oh the screams of adoration.
Good health and many thanks to you, as always
Bart. You were the first and most important blog, and still are. I think
TPM strives for even handed reportage but cannot find many other blogs
that do.
Matthews is talking over Hillary event in Florida
as I write this, "Those are not hand painted signs, HAAA," blurts the idiot,
revealing his agenda before she can utter one word. And then to commercial.
Senator Clinton beats Senator Obama by twenty points or more; Yes we know
that there are no delegates in play, but it's a significant win. NBC keeps
reminding us the obvious about delegates, over and over...The message is
'this is not really happening.'
Just like that Gore win in 2000 that they took
back when Welch started bellowing in anger.
"When is a victory not a victory," says
Andrea Mitchell. There she is. She has no teleprompter.
They give Clinton a few minutes, like two or
three max, and then interrupt with commentary.
"Hillary Clinton will not be interrupting you,"
says Olbermann to Scarborough.
Switching to C-SPAN.
I'd like to write you about Arianna Coulter and
the PuffHo site, but I need to vomit.
Keep hammering. I know you will.
billy
Back to Bartcop.com
Send e-mail
to Bart | Discuss
it on The BartCop Forum | Comment
on it at the BartBlog
|