|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |
Subject: 'We have Osama and we're not giving him up' ?
Bart;
I'm just going to presume that you had a few shots
too many before you
wrote this silly crap, because it's not even
logical.
Longtime readers already know where this is going.
You're going to say goofy stuff and then I'm
going to mock you.
I'm alligned with science and logic - why be
my enemy?
Most of your arguments are non-sequiters.
No, that's not right.
If you can't catch the pass, it doesn't mean
the ball wasn't thrown well.
It might mean you're a lousy receiver.
Second, your presumptions of "if "a," then "b" are completely skewed.
ha ha
Do I hear a gambler talking?
The flaw of what you wrote PRESUMES that America's 9-11 attack was inexorably fated to happen.
If you can convince me that is true, I'll buy
whatever it is you're attempting to sell me.
To my life long experience, only people terminally
infected with some brand of religion are stupid enough
to believe in unalterable fate, and yet you claim
to be a rational atheist.
Dude, you need to take pro-active steps towards
proving me to be illogical.
I don't think I ever said, "9-11
was inexorably fated to happen."
I don't even know what inexorably means,
and I grew up reading comic books.
The only way your straw-man prognostication could
ever even remotely pretend to "hold water"
is if Monkey-smooch Bush had miraculously morphed
into MLK, Bono or Lennon on 9-12...
Wait, is this one of those, "Bart,
the TV show 24
isn't real" e-mails?
I may not be able to list every president, but
I know MLK, Bono or Lennon weren't.
I often teach by using a parable, like Jesus.
Furthermore, your argument stands ONLY if Lennon,
Bono or King were operating as
president yet limited to being our Commander-in-Chief
with a Bush-chosen administration.
In other words, what you wrote is just so much
horse shit.
Wait, say that one more time?
Your argument stands ONLY if Lennon, Bono or King
were operating as president yet
limited to being our Commander-in-Chief with
a Bush-chosen administration.
In other words, what you wrote is just so much
horse shit.
<Bart does a shot...>
What I wrote assumed Lennon, Bono or King were
president when we were unjustly attacked.
If Lennon, Bono or King told the Taliban, "Your
choice - a carpet of gold or a carpet of bombs."
and then started WWIII when the victims failed
to meet their demands, you might have a point.
But since they didn't, you don't.
A King, Bono or Lennon presidency would have operated
so much differently [than the BFEE]
that I [think 9-11 would never have happened.].
Thank me for the synopsi - he tends to go on and on..
Then he said any Lennon, Bono or King administration
would've been better than the BFEE.
With whom do you think he's arguing?
Come on Bart, I know you can do so much better.
No, I'm really doing the best I can.
A man in my position can't afford to fritter
about.
You wrote:
> "If I read you right, you just called Pat
Tillman a sap and a dupe."
Do you think that Bush had treated Tillman like he was a sap and a dupe?
I do.
DanD
< Bart throws a flag.>
Dude, you just cheated.
The question asked was "Was Tillman a sap and
a dupe?"
The correct answer is "No - and how dare you?"
You CHANGED the question to, "Did Bush treat
Tillman like a sap and a dupe?"
The correct answer is "Of course he f-ing did."
How does that make Tillman's sacrifice a handjob?
Tillman did a heroic thing and got screwed by Bush.
Why are you going after Tillman?