|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |
Kennedy Assassination Part II
Regarding the Kennedy assassination, you are wrong on many levels.
The entire event has been successfully re-enacted
many times, all three shots including the shot
that hit both Kennedy and Connelly. It
certainly doesn't fall apart because one guy was unable
to reproduce it, especially when others have.
A link would've been nice.
And you just called the FBI's top sniper ""one
guy?"
The "pristine bullet" was not in fact pristine,
it was flattened on the tip and side with the lead core
leaking out the back (this has also occured in
numerous recreations). No, it wasn't mangled like one
would expect but that doesn't always happen,
even when hitting bones (the head shot fragmented
beyond reconstruction, though.) They took
metal out of Connelly's wrist that when tested was
positively identified as having come from this
bullet, which ballistics prove came from Oswald's gun.
One frame from the Zapruder film is irrelevant
(1/18th of a second), the film has been restored and
shows nothing contrary to the official version.
But the FACT is our government TAMPERED with the film - why?
Kennedy's brain is missing? So? While
it would be nice to have it, it isn't necessary; x-rays clearly
show an entrance wound at the back of his head
(and those x-rays still exist).
Yeah, but the x-rays of whose head?
After they've been caught doctoring the evidence,
how do you believe anything they say?
Every doctor at Parkland Hospital and in Washington
immediately identified the wound as a shot to the
back of the head, long before any "cover-up story"
could be circulated. Forensically there is no arguing that shot.
Besides, the shot that hit both victims (the
"pristine" bullet) and the shot that hit Kennedy in the head are two
different shots, which one is it you have a problem
with?
I have a problem with a government that can't tell the truth.
Contrary to what Cyril Wecht says, Kennedy and
Connelly were perfectly in line with the Texas School
Book Depository window at the moment of the so-called
"magic" shot, the bullet didn't have to turn right
and turn left like Oliver Stone says (Connelly,
in a jumper seat in the car, was six inches lower than Kennedy
and nine inches inboard, not directly in front
of him). The shot that hit both victims was a fluke shot, a lucky
shot,
but not a "magic" shot.
And I never said "Our government wuold NOT lie to us",
You said I was as
whacked out as the Teabaggers and Creationists for
doubting the official story.
I generally take a mother-effer's head off for
an attack like that - but I was in a good mood that day.
I'm saying in this particular case they didn't.
Oh, so you can tell when they're lying and when
they're not?
Fella like you could make a million dollars a
week in Vegas.
Do YOU think a conspiracy this big-- which would
necessarily have to involve who knows how many people
-- could be kept secret for nearly fifty years?
Clinton's blowjob became known by the world in shorter time
than it takes to read the Warren Report and that
only involved two people, how could something like this stay
under wraps for so long? I thought our
government was incompetent, you give it undue credit.
Clinton was discovered because the GOP dug
and cheated and lied and stole until they got what
they wanted.
We still have no idea what secrets are buried
concerning Vietnam, RFK, MLK, Gulf War I, Florida 2000
Iran-Contra, 9-11 and Bush's wars
so your efforts to sell "the truth always
comes out" is a No Sale.
I used to be with the majority and believed there
was more to this story than what we were being told,
I always thought the mob did it (Ruby was the
key). But that logic fell apart upon further review.
Focusing on things like lost brains or reversed
frames is chasing your tail, the evidence that exists
(and has always existed) prove beyond any doubt
it was Oswald and Oswald alone.
I'm happy that you're comfortable with our government's honesty.
A few months ago, CIA Director Panetta said the
CIA was committing crimes behind his back.
Somehow, he found out about it and the crimes
stopped.
Yet you
feel like you
know enough to say we're getting the whole truth?
Which of us seems more whacked out now?
It has nothing to do with governmental integrity.
Oh, really?
Didn't Britney say something like that in Farenheit
9-11?
I understand the need to blame someone bigger
than
an insignificant little fuck like Oswald for
the Crime of the Century but in this case that's exactly who did it.
It's tragic enough without believing the crime
was bigger than it actually was.
drp
PS. And please, don't call him "JFK" anymore.
The man had a name, the man had a title, he deserves
to called by it.
I'm a busy man with shit to do.
If I don't use shortcuts I can't get as much
work done.
Send e-mail
to Bart | Discuss
it on The BartCop Forum | Comment
on it at the BartBlog