Subject: Who's the bigger fool?
To: cianderson@usa.net
Cc: bartcop@bartcop.com
Dear. Mr. Anderson,
In your last posting seen on Bartcop.com,
you posted a quote from a known liar and media whore by the name
of 'Steven (or Stephen) Emerson'. I proceeded
to give you more than example evidence of his lying, yet did not
get a response from you (I see now that your
calling from usa.net instead of indiatimes.com). That article posted
on NewsMax was essentially a regurtation of another
article posted in 1996 by Mr. Emerson against one
Abdurahman Alamoudi. It was said that Mr. Alamoudi
was a linked to Hamas. In doing some more research I
found that Hamas isn't listed as a Terrorist
organization even by the Israel government; rather there militant groups
within Hamas that commit these atrocities and
also that no wrong doing was ever found against Mr. Alamoudi
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0596/9605011.htm
Something even more interesting is that Mr. Alamoudi
is now linked with one pResident Bush's buddies
- Grover Norquist
http://www.washington-report.org/backissues/0596/9605011.htm
Hmm, that must mean that Bush allowed terrorist's
in his organization also. It goes even further - after
the Oklahoma bombing by Timothy McVeigh President
Clinton, proposed a Anti-terrorism bill (that was
watered down, but everything that was in it is
now in the Patriot Act), but one thing put into place was the
use of 'secret evidence' primarily to be
used against immigrants and supposed terrorists. During pResident
Bush's campaign he promised American muslim groups
that he would change this law. He also met with Sami
Al-Arian, a former professor at a Florida University,
whom Steven Emerson led campaign against and his
brother-in-law Mazen Al-Najjar (who was held
in custody for immigration law violation for three with use of
secret evidence law). Al-najjar was never convicted
and there was never presented credible information to
convict on these charges. In fact just a few
weeks before the 9/11 bombings, Mr. Al-Najjar was freed, and
even though he wanted to leave the US, immigration
officials wouldn't let him; after 9/11 he was re-arrested,
using the 'secret evidence' law again, but there
is still no evidence. So was Bush using political manuvering
to get votes from suspected terrorists?
Seems all politicians do what politicians do best.
In your recent addage to the bartcop page, you
claim that the democrats and Clinton will bear the brunt of
the Enron scandal. If your synapses actually
fire and you can cogitate formative thoughts, you'll realize that
politicians are politicians, and money is money,
but it depends on how and who it is given to;
Bartcop has one thing correct that your monkey
mind can't seem to grasp, let's question all of them
and find the information out, and if it was democrats
involved as well then jail the bastards as well.
But you wanted to know the distribution of funds, well - here you go:
Top contributors to Clinton 1996 - I don't see
Ken or Enron anywhere
http://www.opensecrets.org/clinton/clinton96contribs.htm
Top Bush Contributors - Oh, looky! Here comes
Kenny Boy
http://www.opensecrets.org/2000elect/contrib/P00003335.htm
Election 2000 - Hmm, Bush more money? Can't
be
http://www.opensecrets.org/2000elect/contrib/P80000912.htm
Now lets see where Kenny gave, shall we?
http://www.opensecrets.org/parties/asp/softcomp1.asp?txtName=enron
Seems Enron gave money to Dems but only to INCUMBENTS
after their campaigns were done.
http://www.theangryliberal.com/02-05-02.htm
Wanna know how Bush was tied to Enron and others?
http://www.tpj.org/press_releases/gusher.html
http://www.tpj.org/pioneers/kenneth_lay.html
http://www.tpj.org/pioneers/findings.html
http://www.tpj.org/pioneers/summary.html
http://www.tpj.org/new.html
Remember that brou-ha-ha about Clinton's sleepovers
at the white house?
Well gosh darn it, if Clinton can do it so can
Bush:
http://www.public-i.org/story_01_031500.htm
http://www.public-i.org/story_05_031500.htm
http://www.cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,166605-412,00.shtml
http://www.usatoday.com/news/e98/e1376.htm
Let's Compare with Clinton - Wow these sleepovers
gave him $10,000 while Bush's gave $100,000
http://www.cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,235593-412,00.shtml
Oh, Yeah - Kenny Boy never slept there with Clinton,
but he did with Bush I
http://www.cbsnews.com/now/story/0,1597,235661-412,00.shtml
http://www.salon.com/politics/col/spinsanity/2002/02/21/lincoln/index.html
Get this: the Mooney-owned, Pro-Bush Washington
Times actually makes a correction:
http://www.washingtontimes.com/business/20020222-9724038.htm
Enron wrong doings went back to 1987
http://dailynews.yahoo.com/htx/nm/20020221/bs/enron_pattern_dc_1.html
By the it's not like the Democrats didn't try to make changes, it's just that the GOP liked it's money better: http://www.bartcop.com/0221genelyons.htm
Doesn't it bother you that the Bush's are protecting
Saudi Arabian princes just for more money: Royal Family
http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/nationworld/134406773_saudinvest18.html
So after all this, just because because sex wasn't
involved doesn't mean we don't go after everyone
that's involved - Dem's (for being wussy's) and
Repugs (for being evil greedy bastards).
Dylan
Peace!