 |
|
Totally |
|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |
Subject: guns
Your main argument in favor of ownership of handguns
for regular civilians is for personal (and family) protection, correct?
So, what if we look at the issue this way.
I think it is reasonable that with much stricter gun laws, fewer people would own guns.
No, you might slow sales of new guns,
but we'd still have 200 million guns in the hands
of the people.
Most citizens would not want to do something illegal,
or have the know-how or desire to get hooked
up with a black market.
Drugs are illegal and people seem to find a way
to buy some.
So here's what I'm thinking: normal civilians
should be able to own handguns and assault weapons
if and ONLY if the benefits of civilian ownership
outweigh the risks.
The benefits are protecting yourself and your family from violent intruders into your home.
The risks are accidental discharge of the weapon
causing harm and death,
(guns owned by the shooter, the shooter's family,
neighbors).
The question is: Are more people killed or harmed
in a year by home invaders that could have been prevented
with possession of a weapon than are killed by
guns that the shooter would not have had access to with stricter laws?
Stephanie
I heard on AAR that guns are 22 times more
likely to be used against a family member instead of a criminal.
I guess that's possible, certainly with kids,
but I haven't shot anybody yet.
I don't understand people who horse around with
guns and
I don't understand people who drink whiskey and
play with their guns.
But, there are a lot of unstable people in this
country.
P.S.
Please don't think disagreement means I'm attacking
you.
Intelligent disagreement and discussion is the
backbone of a free society,
which is a big reason I visit your site! (That
and to see the truth about the BFEE and cronies) c/;v,m
Ain't nothing wrong with asking a question or having an opinion.
I appreciate you reading the page and the feedback.
Discuss
it on The Bartcop Forum
Discuss it on the BartBlog