Recently, I enjoyed Bartcop's essay on the phrase,
"Let's roll..."
Bart is right, this phrase has become, essentially, commercialized
and bastardized
by those who should not, and do not know how to, use it. But they certainly
seem
to know how to cheapen it and abuse it, essentially urinating on the
memory of the
great hero who made it famous.
This reminds me of, "Hero." While in Atlanta
a few weeks ago, standing
in line with my groceries at a Publix, I notice a whole magazine dedicated
to "3;"
Dale, the racing "Hero." All you fans out there, don't get me wrong,
please don't
bombard me with nasty e-mails. Dale was a talented man. He did what
he was
paid to do well, and for that he carried with pride the title, "The
Intimidator."
He took incredible risks.
Should he be mourned?
Absolutely.
Should he be remembered and missed?
Yes.
Is he a hero for this?
Well,...
On that same check out rack there was a tabloid
declaring Bush, Jr., a hero.
OK, so, how does one qualify as a hero?
I'm sure most people would agree
a hero is someone who, despite their failings, sacrifices their own
personal safety
to help save others. When their life is at risk, they head TOWARDS
the danger
to see what they can do. They do their damnedest, despite how quixotic
or even
clumsy their attempts may be. They do their damnedest, despite when
their personal
failings get in the way. They certainly don't go into hiding. While
soothing those who
suffer is a part of all this, I wouldn't think reading a speech written
by someone else
qualifies. A hero continues tilting windmills, despite derision, name
calling, lawsuits
and harassment by his or her opponents. They certainly don't send out
one of their
inner circle to issue a thinly veiled threat that disagreeing with
them is equal to helping
out the enemy, essentially labeling anyone who disagrees with them
as a traitor.
They don't create agencies that could very well further this dictatorship
like agenda.
They do their job above and beyond the call of duty and continually
attempt to do so,
despite the times when their personal failings may intrude. They certainly
wouldn't
view their job as an opportunity to take long vacations, especially
during a crisis.
Would a hero lie? Maybe, it depends on the
circumstances. Would a hero
always tell the truth? Obviously, not. There are times when telling
the truth
can destroy those a hero wishes to save, soothe or serve.
No, a hero is a person of action, who puts
him or herself in the line of
fire with less regard to their own personal safety than for what they
perceive to be the good of others.
So, like Dale, it's obvious Bush, Jr., doesn't
qualify.
However, there is a man who is closer to the
definition...
...Bill Clinton.