Subject: Stop Scaring People about Iran's
Nuclear capability - list the facts
Bart,
You always suggest to ‘list the facts’ when trying to persuade people
to a certain position.
However, on your web pages lately you’ve been screaming like your hair
is on fire regarding
Iran’s nuclear capabilities and intentions. While that may be
what the lame stream media
is trying to get you to believe, that is not what the FACTS suggest.
Wait,
so if we disagree, it's because I've been duped by the lame stream
media?
Our disagreeing, by definition, means I'm the one who's wrong?
There is NO
evidence since 2003 that Iran is developing a nuclear weapons program
Naval experts
say that Iran has no capability to close the Strait of Hormuz
Iran’s
current liquid propellant missiles are incapable of delivering a
nuclear warhead anywhere
Iran does not
have the manufacturing capability or expertise to produce missiles
capable of delivering a nuclear payload
Even if they
launched conventional weapons, the most they can deliver is 10-15
warheads within a 1000km (Israel is 1300km away)
Their
conventional weapons guidance systems are only accurate within 100-300
meters (thereby only allowing generalized targeting on civilians)
Iran’s recent
missile test firings are believed to be of a missile manufactured by
the U.S.
but not used since
1979 (antiquated and easily defended against) and only have a 120km
range
Am I
allowed to disagree with how "fact-y" those sentences are?
People here in Washington suggest that
Iran has a long history of saber rattling every 6 months and
believe that Iran’s wild claims are intended as much for Iranian
consumption as anything else.
Iran’s conservative leadership keeps
the populace in line by issuing toothless rants directed at the
Great Satan (sound familiar? A similar tactic to our own
conservative elements).
Experts don’t believe that Iran has a
capability to do anything but harass its neighbors and it won’t
for a long, long time to come. We are in no danger of the next
smoking gun being a mushroom cloud.
Here is a link to an expert analysis http://www.cfr.org/iran/serious-irans-threats/p26972
Dennis in DC
I'm looking at the big picture.
You gave me a link to an "expert analysis."
Does that expert have better, more up-to-date info than CIA Director
Leon Panetta?
I can only assume you're
accusing Panetta of lying when he says Iran will have a nuke in a year.
That would make Obama a liar, too (or an imcompetent puppet dancing at
Panetta's instructions)
and if so, I disagree with your analysis.
Does the Democratic party now
hold the position that EVERY
government statement is a lie?
The US government, under Obama, is INCAPABLE
of telling the truth?
Why would Panetta and Obama,
presumable Hillary, too, lying us into a war with Iran?
IF Obama and Panetta are
lying us into a war, they'd be guilty of war crimes, right?
This is merely a question:
Everyone who disagrees
with me (Panetta and Obama are either lying or they're not) thinks
Obama is a war criminal?
From what I'm reading, there's
no way Panetta and Obama are "mistaken."
They're either war criminals or they're not.
Does every left-of-center
Democrat think Obama is a war criminal?
Is there NO CHANCE Panetta and
Obama are being honest about Iran?
Am I really the last sane
Democrat in America?
Share|
Send
e-mail to Bart
Back to Bartcop.com
Send
e-mail to Bart
Back to Bartcop.com