Subject: Oh, how I hate Hillary
Bart:
John Edwards has stated clearly that his vote
to give Bush the power to invade Iraq was an absolute mistake.
While Hillary has said that if she knew then,
what she knows now, she would not have made that vote, she will not
renounce that vote on a personal level.
The reason that she will not is because of a film, released by Code Pink,
making the internet rounds.
That's an I-hate-Hillary assumption on your part.
Show me where Hillary said the Code Pink film
is holding her hostage.
The tape was made when she held a forum with them
before the vote. She used the
Diane Feinstein dodge at the time, "if you had
access to the information that I have."
You call it a dodge, I call it an explanation.
You're making every I-hate-Hillary assumption
and taking every I-hate-Hillary leap possible
to attempt to make her look bad.
Bottom line - you hate her more than I like her.
However, politicians who did not feel the pressure
of the media drumbeat to war (or simply
disregarded it) had no compunction against voting
against sending troops to Iraq.
I think those who voted to ignore Saddam's "threat"
should explain themselves.
Remember, Hillary represents New York, not Carolina,
not Ohio and not Wisconsin.
Edwards, Kucinish and Feingold don't have to answer to New York voters.
Can't you grasp even the simplest facts?
The people who were designated to inspect in Iraq
were saying clearly and completely
that Bush's cherry picked "intelligence" information
did not square with the facts.
At the very least they realized that Iraq presented
no immediate threat.
At the very least, they were guessing.
The CIA said they had solid proof.
You want to look back in hindsight and say, "They
should've known then what we know now."
You can argue that Collin Powell presented a "slam
dunk" presentation to the UN.
I remember laughing at it at the time, because
it was no such thing.
That's probably the biggest load-of-crap sentence
you've ever sent me.
Jimmy the Sausolito lawyer knows so much about
aluminum nuclear-launch tubes,
that one look at Powell's proof told you the
100M American lives gamble was a sure bet?
Like I said, you hate her much more than I like
her.
You don't come here for the hunting.
You come here because you like the feel of my
Size 11 boot.
You don't offer "proof" by showing the gallery
cartoon renderings of what you believe might be there.
Everyone bought it at the time.
Did you write to me at the time with your
Nancy
Grace Guarantee?
It is very clear that Hillary made a political
calculation at the time, and not a hard decision that would have
prevented the death of over 3,000 American troops,
the disfigurement of 10s of thousands of others,
and the death of over 100,000 civilians.
How nice of you to give Bush, Rummy and Cheney
a pass on this quagmire.
Blaming Hillary and NOT the BFEE makes me wonder
about your sanity.
Expect a Christmas card from Karl Rove (it might even include a check!).
With the radical left making apologies for the BFEE, the Fascists'
job is soooo much easier.
You can't see the irony of attacking Hillary while protecting Bush?
Bush, Cheney and Rummy have your support as you attack the leading
Democrat?
Are you really a lawyer?
With that one vote, and her subsequent refusal
to disavow it without equivocation, it is a very clear statement
that the presidency, to her, is more important
than what was lost. This, in conjunction with her vote on the
bankruptcy bill, has sealed my vote against her
in the California primary.
Well, then, you can't vote for Obama, either.
Who's getting your vote, Jimmy?
Or are you unable to name a perfect, warts-free
candidate?
Do you plan to vote for that perfect candidate
who doesn't exist?
BTW, every slur you hurled at Hillary works against
Edwards, too.
He calls it "a mistake," she says they got bad
info.
You seem to carry more about semantics
than the dead and the maimed.
If I'm wrong about that, please earmark some vitriol for others who
"voted for war."
If she wins the nomination, which I doubt, I will
vote for her in the national, but all I will expect from her
is a slightly more compassionate corporate control
of America. Read that Fascism Lite.
You're one of those left-wing crazies who sees
our next president as a Bush clone.
That tells me your understanding of politics
is warped, skewed and borderline-monkey.
You're eager to forgive Edwards because he's labeled
his gullibility a mistake.
If Hillary said, "That
vote was a mistake," you'd merely change
the reason you hate her.
This will be Hillary's downfall.
Do you play poker?
I have severe doubts that Hillary will win the
Democratic nomination.
Democrats will refuse to run Hillary Clinton,
and it won't be because of the Republican attack machine.
As I've said all along, if she can survive the
Demo knives in her back, she'll be president.
But why are you so eager for McCain to win and
widen this bloody quagmire?
You really, really hate the Demo front
runner, yet you don't have a candidate.
Shooting at our front runner only helps the pro-war
neocons.
Bill Clinton often stated a theorem which Hillary
has never learned.
"The American people will almost always eventually
get it right."
If you, as a political leader, get it right,
you will have their support when you need it.
What a load of crap you've fabricated there.
The American people got it right on November 7,
2007.
Hillary failed to calculate that when she voted
for the invasion of Iraq.
Jimmy the anti-Demo front running lawyer
When they "got it right" in 2006, they re-elected Hillary.
And for the 1,000th time, she didn't vote to invade Iraq.
Your pretense that she did just proves your bad intent.
Note: Jimmy's my friend.
I'm only being mean to slap him back into reality
Send
e-mail to Bart
Discuss
it on The Bartcop Forum
Discuss it on the BartBlog
|