From: AGLoomis@aol.com
 
 Subject: Re: one world government
 
 A couple of days ago, you wrote:

 > One world government, hummm.
 
 > I wonder if he means a government where there is one leader dictating
 > to the  masses on what they should wear, eat, act, think and do in social
 > settings and  these rules are based on the leader's personal whims and
 > interpretations of a text that is based on the nature science and the
 > knowledge of the world 5,000 years ago.
 
 > A government that erects a wall around its people to keep the outside world out.
 > Yeah I agree.
 > I don't want to see that either.

 Thank you for having the balls to say out loud what I've only dared hint at
 around the dittosmurfs here in Mississippi. On two separate occasions, I've
 suggested in letters to the editor that their "mandatory Christianity by law"
 sounds to me a lot like what their Savior-on-a-Stick said in Revelation 13:15
 ("And he had power to...cause that as many as would not worship the image of
 the beast should be killed").

 To this good day, some of them refuse to take the hint, continue to insist that what America
 needs is to have Big Government teaching our schoolchildren when and how to pray to whom.
 I've finally decided that they just don't care. They believe that nobody
 who calls himself a "Bible-believing Christian" can ever commit an immoral
 act, and nobody who doesn't call himself that can ever commit any other kind.

 And if Pat Robertson tells President Smirk to pass a law that no man may buy
 or sell unless he has "the Mark of the Lord" in his right hand or his
 forehead...well, that's just the price we pay for True Holiness.

 (The irony in all this, of course, is that if Jehovah would stop trying
 to pass himself off as the One True God, His rebellion against God Herself
 would be over and He'd be welcomed back into Heaven with open arms. But he
 just keeps repeating the First Commandment over and over: "I love you,
 because I am love. Love Me unconditionally, as I love you, or I will torture
 you forever because I love you so much."

 That's not a God of Love -- that's a God of Fear.
 If that's Christianity, then OJ was the savior.

 Please print this dyspeptic rant for the benefit of the people who think they're Christians.)

 Austin, and good day.
 
 

 (Austin, actually Stephen bennett wrote that, but I agree with him and you.)