AUSTIN -- Excuse me, but something seems to be slipping into obscurity
with no media comment whatever,
and as Arthur Miller wrote in `Death of A Salesman,' "Attention must
be paid."
The event was a modest announcement by the Office of the Special Prosecutor
that there is insufficient
evidence to bring a charge of wrongdoing against Bill or Hillary Clinton
in the Whitewater investigation.
That story lasted exactly one news cycle, and then we dropped it like
a hot rock. If that's a one-cycle story,
just what the `hell' has been going on for the last six years? Six
years, $52 million and there is no there there?
There never was, and I'm sorry to play I-told-you-so, but I told you
so. So what was this madness about?
David Maraniss of `The Washington Post' has this nice riff that he does
about Bill Clinton as the Republicans'
Moby Dick. They've had their harpoons in this white whale since '92,
but they can't kill him -- he keeps
dragging them to their deaths in his wake.
Gene Lyons, the veteran Arkansas political reporter, always saw it as
a media foul-up, starting with Jeff Gerth's
front-page story in `The New York Times,' which he ruthlessly dissects
in his book `Fools for Scandal.'
The rest of the media pack ran around for years saying, "Well, it was
Page One in the `Times,'
so there must something to it," even though no one could ever find
much to it.
The eternal problem for out-of-state reporters trying to do Arkansas
stories was that bizarre stew of
old Clinton enemies, incestuous politics and entrepreneurial weirdoes
who turned Clinton-hating into
one of the country's most picturesque industries. Lyons and Joe Conason
vividly describe some of the
more outrageous practitioners of Clinton-hatred in `The Hunting of
the President.'
Then there is the blame-the-victim school, which holds that if Clinton
had behaved himself,
none of this ever would have happened.
OK, he didn't do anything wrong in Whitewater, he didn't do anything
wrong in Filegate, he didn't do
anything wrong in Travelgate -- but he sure had a highly improper relationship
with a White House intern,
although how that came to be a subject for an obsessive prosecutor
assigned to investigate a real estate
deal is still hard to comprehend.
Right to the end, the special prosecutor was still complaining about
the Clintons' failure to produce
relevant documents in a timely manner. I can't understand why the Clintons
weren't more anxious
to cooperate with Kenneth Starr, can you?
I think Jeffrey Toobin, the legal writer, may be onto the root of the
problem in his book `A Vast Conspiracy.'
His thesis is that we have witnessed the criminalization of politics.
That it led promptly to lunacy beyond description is indisputable --
I forget why we had to read about
Rep. Henry Hyde's youthful indiscretion or Rep. Bob Livingstone's love
life, but I distinctly recall that
the only man in America having a good time was Larry Flynt. The whole
thing was perfectly bonkers.
To this day, I cannot explain why Henry Cisneros wound up in the dock,
much less why his ex-ladyfriend
is in prison or why her brother-in-law was pursued by the FBI.
The FBI is clearly part of the problem, and one sees yet another distorting
effect of this season of madness
in the fallout from the Wen Ho Lee case. The farcical congressional
hearings on the case amounted to
Republicans giving Louis Freeh a free pass because he has been so politically
useful to them. The driving
force behind the misbegotten Lee case was, once again, political: The
R's were hot to prove that the
Chinese money that Clinton got in '96 had somehow damaged the national
security. Who cares that a
man's life was ruined in the process?
Now we are left with the tragic case of Clinton-haters in the post-Clinton
era.
What can we do to help these bereft citizens?
Fortunately, they seem to be able to switch focus to Hillary Clinton
with little difficulty, so if she wins her
Senate race, they can just keep on keeping on. And the rest of us?
Any chance we could learn anything from this?
Media?
`The New York Times' was willing to re-evaluate its performance on the
Wen Ho Lee case in the wake
of new evidence -- an act of great honor by that newspaper. I wonder
if the members of the Washington
press corps are willing to hold a Whitewater post-mortem to see if
they can figure out why they let that
story get out of control and run them.
There were lots of sensible citizens through the soap opera, but few
in the Washington media corps.
The citizenry at large, once again, deserve great commendation for
having kept their heads while all
about them were losing theirs. They had no trouble distinguishing between
the job that Clinton was
doing and their opinions of his personal life. Way to go, Americans.