BY ROBERT NOVAK SUN-TIMES COLUMNIST
Undeniable panic is gripping partisan Republicans, from rank-and-file
voters to seasoned
political operatives, with two full months left before the presidential
election. They are
dismayed not so much about the surge by Al Gore but the loss of confidence
in George W. Bush.
This mood may reflect the very nature of the Grand Old Party. One Bush
adviser puts it this way:
"When Democrats face trouble, they circle the wagons; Republicans head
for the tall grass."
Perplexed by the boost the vice president was given by his pedestrian
acceptance speech in
Los Angeles, they are panicked by Bush's seeming inability to counter
it.
Polling at the conclusion of the Labor Day weekend not only shows that
the Democratic base
has returned to Gore. More troubling are defections of vital independent
voters from Bush.
Since Los Angeles, it is not so much a case of the Democrats succeeding
as Republicans failing.
The Bush campaign's attempt to undermine Gore's credibility through
its maneuvers on
presidential debates has flopped, in the opinion of his own supporters.
Since his masterful performance at the Philadelphia convention, Bush
has looked too much
like Bob Dole in 1996. By not expanding on his acceptance speech's
skillfully crafted call for
tax reduction, Bush has led friend and foe to conclude--however incorrect
they may be--that he
no more believes in his conservative issues than Dole did. The question
asked by Republicans:
Why has he not pounded hard in favor of cutting taxes and against Gore's
big government nostrums?
The complaint by the party faithful that Bush had permitted himself
to be put on the defensive
resulted in last week's TV commercial, narrated by a sarcastic-sounding
woman, attacking Gore's
credibility on campaign finance reform. Bush sources say the ad was
carefully tested in focus groups
who gave rave reviews, especially from women. But Republican politicians
prefer sticking to
advertising that assaults Gore's position on prescription drug subsidies.
Perhaps the biggest immediate worry in Republican ranks concerns the
Bush strategy on
presidential debates. If the vice president truly has forged ahead
to a commanding lead,
the best opportunity to cut him down to size will be in a debate--the
sooner the better.
Yet, the Bush campaign has devised an intricate strategy aimed at both
creating a
debate format suitable for the governor and assailing Gore's credibility.
But harping on Gore's refusal to appear with two regular television
interviewers
(NBC's Tim Russert and CNN's Larry King), whose invitations he previously
had accepted,
is far removed from the undecided voter at the lunch counter. The self-appointed
presidential
debate commission might be past due for its comeuppance, but Bush's
rejection of its proposals
make him appear to be avoiding a face-off with Gore.
Finally, Bush has been privately criticized by his own supporters for
his vulgar comment
about a veteran (and very liberal) New York Times reporter. It was
not "presidential,"
betraying a lack of the discipline that is essential for this long
process.
The Bush campaign is certainly not the disaster of the last two Republican
presidential efforts.
Shortcomings have been tended to quickly. Cheney took care of his stock-option
problem without
letting it fester for long. Bush released his own prescription drug
program, plugging another hole.
Still, Republican morale is drooping. I have heard from more than one
Republican politician that
the problem may not be Bush's at all, but the American people's. Could
it be, they ask, that
voters--while enjoying prosperity--really want more government instead
of less?
No Republican could fight that mind-set of the electorate.
There is little doubt that Bush needs to change the atmosphere to keep
panicky backers from
heading for the high grass. A sarcastic TV ad, a first-class prescription
drug plan and a clever
debate strategy won't suffice. The Republican candidate needs a boost,
and at this stage that
may require a face-to-face confrontation with Gore before the Olympics,
even if it means
concessions on the rest of the debates for the year.
Robert Novak appears on CNN's "Capital Gang" at 6 p.m. Saturday and
"Evans, Novak, Hunt and Shields" at 4:30 p.m.Saturday and 10 a.m.
Sunday.