Dear Mr Bartcop
I know that I might have caused your
email system to crash with all my emails this week,
and i know that you haven't posted any
of them yet, so I have a proposition for you.
You are obviously a very busy man, with
your daily tirades and your love for Chivas,
or whatever that booze is that you have
been hyping. So I have put together all my replies
to you this week and have created a
copy that all you have to do is change it to html and upload.
Before I get to it, I have some suggestions
for a name change for you.
You could call your tome Bartfart Satirical,
or BS for short.
Or maybe Bartfart Art, or BA for short.
You're a classy guy, Papa.
Was it your "talent on loan from God," that came up with that?
No wonder you don't mind Rush's blowjob jokes and tampon jokes.
I know that you push the envelope to its limit,
so I don't think you will be offended.
But if you ever get to posting porno pixs
on your page, I will be unable to visit you to straighten you out.
Sure, I could refer to your page as "Papa's Sack o' Manure,"
but Jesus wouldn't be proud me me if I returned your vulgarisms.
I have saved you the trouble of making opening comments. So here it is.
Some of you have asked about my insanely religious righteous buddy papax7.
That should read, "religiously insane."
He has sent me so much email this week
that I have
dedicated this issue to him. If
you want to see him, go to
http://www.shalomjerusalem.com
He has not only his picture on the home
page, but he has a section with several old photos of
his ancestors from his papa's side (Magee)
to his GGGGgranddad (Sheldon) on his mama's side.
Here it is.
You might be able to do a whole Rush
Limbaugh-A Heritage Hero for America (RL-AHHA),
or whatever it is you call your web
page.
I have two things.
This week, here in MI, we had a story
coming out of Manistee, in the heart of Republican country.
A 43 year old woman and her mother were
walking downtown when a Mexican asked the mother,
in Spanish, if she could please move.
The 43 year old woman then said, and I quote,
"I wish these damned spics would learn
to speak English."
There was an off duty police officer,
of Mexican heritage, who overheard this and he followed the
two ladies to their car, where the 43
year old proceeded to "flip him off". He took down the license
plate number and filed a complaint.
The 43 year old got a summons to appear
in court for "disorderly conduct",
but when she got there she was charged
with "insulting conduct in a public place."
Manistee, a dumpy little town in the
heart of one of the most Republican districts in America,
has an ordinance stating "No person
shall engage in any indecent, insulting, immoral or obscene
conduct in any public place."
It is obvious the Repubs in this area
are not compassionate conservatives. I would like some comment
from you on this incident. I will agree
that what the 43 year old woman said wasn't nice, and she
probably isn't a "lady"
Suddenly, I'm content to live in Knuckledrag.
I have no comment other than all those in that story deserve
each other.
I'm grateful there were no children involved.
Now for part two.
The following is based on a true story.
Some of the names have been changed to protect
the innocent and some titles have been
added to make it more interesting.
Sen. Papa, junior Constitutional Party
Senator from Oklahoma, revealed this week
that one of his office computers had
been used to access some porn web sites.
Upon being notified of this, Sen Papa,
often referred to as being fair, honest and the
conscience of the senate, immediately
installed a porn blocking program to block further
access to porn sites, and suspended
the staffer's Internet access.
The White House (the one in DC, not the
porn site that was accessed) issued a statement
through their chief propaganda officer,
Bart Cop, criticizing Sen Papa's hypocrisy.
Sen Papa had recently been critical
of some White House staffers accessing
and downloading large amounts of pornography.
For those of you who live in Rio Linda,
this parable is similar to what occurred with Sen Inhofe
and his office. Yes, some staffers
did download so much porn that it crashed the office computer
system. But when Sen Inhofe found out,
he fired the staffers involved. And he has even been
somewhat sympathetic with the porngate
problem in the White House.
...on second thought, maybe you should stick with material written
by others.
For some reason, you wear me out.
I've been arguing with knuckleheads since 1990, and you just
make me tired.
Maybe because I know deeeeeeep down you're a decent guy that
I guess I hesitate to run you thru with my terrible, swift sword.
Yes, the White House has said that they
have "taken action" against the staffers
involved in their "porngate" situation.
But they haven't said what that action was.
Were they fired?
Were they given commendations?
The Sen Inhofe situation occurred in
June 1999. This was about the same time that
porngate was occurring. And some sources
even state that White House people knew
what was going on about this time.
I can't wait to see you comment on this
in a future issue of RL-AHHA
Papa, Sean Hannity makes more sense than you. (Not a compliment)
What the hell are you talking about?
Who did Inhofe fire?
What were their positions and titles?
What does he consider "porn?"
Playboy.com?
Bartcop.com?
It's difficult to nail you on something because you're all over
the place.
That "tired" thing you do to opponents is really something.
It's slick!
Can you teach me that?
<<Bartcop wrote:
White House Denounces Counsel Over Clinton Report
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The White House on Thursday denounced
the independent counsel's
office over reports that a new grand jury has been hearing evidence
against President Clinton in the
Monica Lewinsky case. Independent counsel Robert Ray reportedly
impaneled a grand jury on July 11.
Ray took over as independent counsel in the investigation after
Kenneth Starr's departure.
White House spokesman Jake Siewert said. ``The timing of this
leak reeks to high heaven,
but given the record of the office of the independent counsel,
it's not surprising.''
If I was Al Gore, I'd scrap the prepared speech and go with this
news.
"That's all the GOP offers America - peeping into your bedroom.
If Bush is elected, they will repeat 1998
and shut down the government so they can investigate the sex
lives of their political opponents." >>
PAPA REPLIES: I kind of expected this
from you and all your lunylib demo cronies.
Did you see the news where the REAL
leaker of this news admitted his mistake?
Let me tell you about him.
<snippage>
We know all about the Democratic judge.
I was wondering if you plan on issuing an
apology for unjustly inferring that the GOPpers were to blame?
And I am also wondering if you plan on
telling your bosses at the White House to issue an apology also.
Let me see... how should I put this?
"No," and "No."
<<The Smirk Smack of the Day.
Not only that, but the air in Houston today is rated UNHEALTHY!
Way to go, Smirk! >>
PAPA REPLIES: The Facts: Emissions in
Texas have dropped.
Under gee Dubya's governorship, emissions
have fallen in Texas. According to the Texas Natural
Resources Conservation Commission's
Industrial Emissions Inventory, industrial air emissions in
Texas have dropped by 11% from 1994
to 1998.
Houston does not lead the nation in air
pollution. Los Angeles has surpassed Houston this year
in ozone exceedances. Through July 17,
Los Angeles has exceeded the federal ozone standard
on 17 days, compared to Houston's 13
days. (Associated Press, 8/7/00)
Now I now that you rarely deal with facts,
so I can see why you are just following
the marching orders of your lunylib
demo bosses.
I don't believe you, on many different levels.
A. I made nothing up.
My source is USA Today.
Their source is the American Lung Association
and the EPA.
You, of course, will say the scientists
are lying because you are anti-education.
To you, science and logic are "the tricks"
the devil uses to confuse the innocent.
Remember, when Hitler gathered up the
Jews, he also gathered the teachers and the
pointy-headed elites. Why?
Because education is the enemy to the ignorant.
I'd like to see you and Adolph disagree
on the dangers of having an education.
B. Are you trying to say Smirk cleaned the Texas air with
his "voluntary" program?
You can't be that stupid - nobody is.
If Big Oil can make $50,000,000 cleanly, or
$50,000,010 by pumping hundreds
of thousands of tons of toxins in the air
every year, they'll make that extra ten bucks.
I can't explain why they act this way, but
it's the same thing that keeps Laura and Pigboy
screaming at Clinton and whoring for shitty
products when they already have a hundred
million each tucked away safely in the bank.
That extra nickle is everything to
the committed ditto-monkey.
C. The reason I quote USA Today is NOT because they're
a good paper.
I quote them so people like you can
verify what I'm saying.
If I quote the K-Drag World, you'll
say, Scan it and show me" every time.
Today's USA Today, ONCE AGAIN, shows
Houston's air is "UNHEALTHY"
and they say the air in Los Angeles
is "Moderate."
But I should believe your RNC-faxes
instead of the Lung Association and the EPA?
D. "IF"
(I'm trusting you know the meaning of that word) Texas's air is cleaner,
I wouldn't credit the man whose
fortune and power came from Big Oil.
I'd assume the liberals with all
their "business-killing regulations" were the cause
until I saw some scientific data
on the subject.
E. YOUR side is the side that gets an erection talking
about what an idiot the
"tree-hugging, combustion engine hater"
Gore is.
You can't run away from your record
at a time like this.
When Gore starts talking about
cleaner air, you guys hoot & holler and play
grab-ass with each other just
thinking about Gore's stupid clean air bullshit.
"IF" the air gets cleaner,
only a ditto-monkey would credit
the side who voted to relax federal standards for clean air.
Only a fool would credit the side
that claims government should stay out of it.
Only a soldier in Rush's Army
would credit the polluters for the cleaner air.
...........
<<<Subject: Papax7
From: style_invitational@yahoo.com
Just curious... Whatever happened to your
religious friend "Papax7"?
WM
He's still around, and still insane.
Every week or so he sends a 180 Meg "Papa's
Cyber Weakly" to me that contains
every fax the GOP sent him, but no original
material. I'll put a link up to his next tome. >>>
PAPA REPLIES: Its nice that your readers
miss me. I don't know how much of my emails to you
this week will make it into your RL-AHHA
issue 957, but it won't be for lack of trying.
I do occasionally put in some original
stuff, but not too much. The purpose of Papa's Cyber Weakly
is to report news that the mainline
biased media types don't report.
Oh, poor you! All you have is
Fox Whore News,
the Moonie Washington Times,
the NY Post,
the Dallas Morning Whore,
the Whore Street Journal,
Matt the Internet Whore,
Tim the Whore,
This Whore with Sam & Cokie,
Face the Whore,
the McLaughlin Whore,
Rush the vulgar Pigboy,
Laura the Martyr,
Michael Medved,
William Safire,
Robert Novak's three shows,
G. Gordon Liddy,
the Michael Reagan show,
The Ollie Traitor show,
O'Reilly the Whore,
Hannity the Whore,
Paula Von Zahn,
Juan Williams,
Judas "Stephie" Maximus,
Chris the Screamer,
Mancow,
Bob Grant,
Lucianne Goldberg,
The Beltway Boys,
plus Laura Ingraham, Barbara Olson, Ann Coulter, Paul Greenburg
and the
dozens of we-hate-Clinton-more-than we-love-our-families crowd,
...but you feel the need to get the word out due to the "mainline biased media?"
Now do you see why I question your sanity?
Each issue has opening comments and closing
comments. I know that they are long, and you
probably are on your fifth bottle of
Chinaco by the time you get to the end of each issue.
Actually, I send out Papa's Cyber Weakly
twice a weak, but I know how busy you are
putting out ten issues of RL-AHHA a
weak and getting 964 emails a weak.
And you forgot to put in the link to
Papa's Cyber Weakly. Its
http://www.egroups.com/group/papax7
-----------------------------------------------------------------
PLACE YOUR REBUTTAL HERE, IF YOU CAN COME
UP WITH ONE)
Rebuttal to what?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
First off, let me apologize for neglecting
to keep up with your web site stuff.
I went to your link page and was a little
bit sad that your favorite right wing zealot wasn't listed.
But never mind that.
Secondly, I couldn't help but notice
from reading a couple of your latest rantings that you don't
like Fox News and its cadre of reporters
and reporterettes.
I can understand why you don't like them.
They actually ask the tough questions of your lunylib
demo bosses and they aren't reporting
just the "left of center" (far left of center) side of an issue.
As you should be aware of, in my twice
a weak Papa's Cyber Weakly I carry examples of the
mainline media types left wing bias.
And lastly, you seem to be of the mind
that the most recent Grand Jury investigation is into
BC's sexual escapades, or "peeping into
your bedroom".
It saddens me that your feel that his
being found in contempt of court, his perjury,
and his upcoming disbarment are considered
"peeping into your bedroom".
You are such a fake.
The whole point of Linda Tripp working with Ken Starr was to
create a situation
where they knew Clinton couldn't use his Constitutional powers
to refuse to answer.
So Clinton did just what the American voters would've done,
and that's why you guys
lost seats and why Clinton would kick your ass again if he could
run.
No one in American history has ever had a taxpayer-funded, never-ending
witchhunt
like the way your bedroom peepers came after Clinton.
You still think Clinton's cock is a crime.
Can't you see how out-of-touch that religio-inspired revenge
crap has hurt the GOP?
It's one of the reason Smirk's going to lose this election.
Papa, will you ever get off Clinton's cock?
I know that the chances of all me emails
being read from me are slight, but I
feel an obligation to your readers,
like style_invitational@yahoo.com
of making
my presence known. It appears that I
am the balance to your left wing rantings.
I acknowledge that 99% of the time that
you fairly represent me to your readers
and are AOK for a lunylib BC loving
demo.
_______________________
PLACE YOUR REBUTTAL HERE
I disagree with your assertion that you are sane.
<<<Rush is whining about Social Sucurity being in trouble.
Hey, Pigboy!
If what you say is true, (snicker)
why is Smirk calling for a trillion dollar tax cut for the rich?
According to you, the country can't afford it! >>>
Its obvious that you don't understand
the complexities of our tax system.
The SS system is separate from the rest
of the tax system.
The GOPpers have a lock box plan that
your bosses, Clinton/AlphaGore version 8.0
are trying to claim as their own. So
every few weeks when the surplus number keeps growing,
it is a surplus that is separate from
SS.
Social Security, at this time, has a
surplus. But it is heading for trouble.
At some time in the future expenses
will far exceed income.
There is a fundamental problem with
SS that needs to be addressed
within the context of the SS system.
Your bosses Clinton/AlphaGore version 8.0
want to just throw surplus money at
it.
That won't fix the long term problems
with SS.
You're welcome for me straightening
you out.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
YOUR REBUTTAL HERE
I'm beginning to think this is a hoax.
Is that you, Artie?
First, you said, Social Security is heading
for trouble.
Then you follow that with, Clinton/Gore
want to just throw surplus money at it.
See?
You're better at arguing my side than I am.
...are we getting close to the end?
I'm really tired...
<<<Great Confirming Quotes
BartCop said:
Why don't you whip your Bible out when you're alone?
Oh, that's right.
You want to be seen praying.
The prayers mean nothing in and of themselves,
it's being seen praying that
gives them that special thrill. That's why
they want to pray in schools and
football games and every other damn place
- so other people can watch them.
"And when you pray, do not be like the hypocrites,
for they love to pray
standing in the synagogues and on the street
corners to be seen by men.
I tell you the truth, they have received their
reward in full.
But when you pray, go into your room, close
the door and pray to your
Father, who is unseen. Then your Father, who
sees what is done in secret,
will reward you.
And when you pray, do not keep on babbling
like pagans,
for they think they will be heard because
of their many words.
Do not be like them, for your Father knows
what you need before you ask him.
(Jesus Christ, thru Matthew 6:5-8) >>>
Quoting Scripture. I Like that. Too bad you
really don't know what you are talking about.
Let me quote some more scripture right back
at you.
MT.:13: Ye are the salt of the earth: but if
the salt have lost his savour, wherewith shall it be salted?
it is thenceforth good for nothing, but to
be cast out, and to be trodden under foot of men.
14: Ye are the light of the world. A city that is set on an hill cannot be hid.
15: Neither do men light a candle, and put
it under a bushel, but on a candlestick;
and it giveth light unto all that are in the
house.
16: Let your light so shine before men, that
they may see your good works,
and glorify your Father which is in
heaven.
You see why snip Papax7's
e-mails?
He can go for days like this...
Mk:4:21: And he said unto them, Is a candle
brought to be put under a bushel, or under a bed?
and not to be set on a candlestick?
Lk:11:33: No man, when he hath lighted a candle,
putteth it in a secret place, neither under a bushel,
but on a candlestick, that they which come
in may see the light.
Now those of you who oppose any kind of public
prayer always use the verses you use to
attack public prayer. I don't mean to sound
like I am forcing my beliefs on you and your readers,
but I do have an obligation to defend the
faith.
When those of us who believe that we should
be able to pray before a football game,
or meet before or after school to pray, don't
want to "pray so as to be seen."
As the Bible also says "1Thes:5:18: In every
thing give thanks: for this is the will of God
in Christ Jesus concerning you."
The context of the verses you quoted was that
there were many religious Jews during the first days
of Jesus who wanted others to see them praying,
etc. They did that for selfish reasons.
Its all a matter of the heart. Jesus Christ
looks sees the heart attitude and knows the motivation.
HE knows what we want and need without us
asking, but HE does command us to "ask"
I can see you now, saying that the verses I
used don't mention "prayer". You are right.
They mention "light" and "salt".
I don't know how many of these I have
to write before you acknowledge me.
But I will keep it up when I get the
chance.
And another thing, when Jesus fed the
multitudes, he publicaly prayed and gave thanks for the food.
And in Luke chapter 3 Jesus prayed publically
at his baptism.
Nobody said, "You can't pray."
No power on Earth can stop you from praying.
Say it after me:
No-body Can Stop Me From Pray-ing.
Say it again.
No-body Can Stop Me From Pray-ing.
You see how easy that is?
But you want to pray with a microphone and speakers
in a setting when schoolkids are expected to be present.
You already have that which you claim you need.
I have an idea:
Why not go to Radio Shack, but a mic and some speakers and then
invite the neighbors over for some old-fashioned snake-handlin'?
You do a lot of talking about Jerusalem.
You know, if a Jew grabs the microphone, he might say Jesus
isn't God.
Then what happens?
You don't have the sense to realize the Supreme Court ruling protects
YOU
from having to hear some crazy person go on and on about his
superstitions.
By the way, when Jesus prayed, he didn't use the school's
PA system, did he?