From:
Dave
Subject: Re: What hit the Pentagon
on 9-11?
Bart -
Why the link to the slick, fictional, mesmerizing
piece of garbage that directs
the viewer to conclude that Flight 77 did not
hit the Pentagon?
Why that link?
Why not that link?
Can I get a list of approved links from you?
Did you know this was called "Objective Reality"?
No, but what difference would that make?
What if he called it, "A Citizen with Questions?"
Would it be OK if I ran it with that title?
Is your hatred of the Bush Crime Family so acute
that you are willing to trade in your credibility
by embracing moonbat theories on 9/11?
Hasn't the BCF done enough PROVABLE dirty deeds?
Dude, flame off.
You're so high on your horse your nose is starting to bleed.
How should I answer those who write and say,
"Why did you print that crap from Dave the idiot?"
The only thing we know for sure about 9-11 is that Bush doesn't want
the truth to come out.
What's wrong with asking a few questions?
What is objective about starting that video with
a speech from ADOLPH HITLER?
I think you already have that answer - why are you asking?
What is objective about showing SELECTIVE quotes
from witnesses - and IGNORING the dozens
and dozens of statements from witnesses who clearly
saw a large Boeing airliner hit the Pentagon?
Because those selective quotes exist.
If I'm writing a story about the horrors of Katrina, I'm not going
to include statements from everyone
who thought the feds and the cops did a great job. I'm going to talk
to the ones who did.
What is objective about displaying a "moving"
quote on a black screen, to mesmerize the viewer?
What is objective about putting a soundtrack
of driving rock music behind the video?
Dude, I think it's called "film making."
The fools who made the video - who wish other
fools to follow their absurd fantasy that Flight 77 did not
hit the Pentagon - were foolish enough to include
a picture clearly showing a Boeing wheel rim in the wreckage!
You clearly are behind the "official" version of 9-11.
That's OK, sometimes without concrete facts you can hold in your hand,
you have little choice but to accept that which is accepted by the
masses.
Does that mean Oswald shot JFK?
Does that mean Sirhan shot RFK?
Does that mean Ray shot MLK?
We don't know, because our government is lying to us.
Either you actually believe this moonbat stuff,
Bart, which is disappointing enough
- or, you are floating this garbage out there
to stir controversy. And that is worse.
Dave, you sit on your high horse and decree that there are two, and
only two possibilities.
The idea that I might put some radical, anti-Bush idea in print pisses
you off?
If that's the caee, how did your e-mail make it on the page?
Question: Is it true I only print stuff from the crazies?
Did you know that the entire missile-into-the-Pentagon
fantasy was started by a French author,
who did not even come to this country to research
his "revealing" book?
The gullibility of the American people is a ceaseless
wonder, and is being shamefully exploited
via 9/11 conspiracy theories. Now you are
promoting them. How appalling.
Dave
Dave, you and your horse are on ice thinner than Sorvino shaves his
garlic.
Truth is, you have an opinion and you want others to agree with it.
No problem there, you just have to keep it in your pants.
The "moonbat" stuff exists because, as I said, it's certain
that Bush is lying about 9-11
but more importantly, the physical evidence doesn't jive with the lies
we're being told.
Some accuse me of carrying Bush's water when I say *I* wasn't at the
CIA-senate-Saddam briefing,
so I can't say why the senate Dems believed the Pentagon's presentation
- we call that an "unknown."
You, on the other hand, are giving the rest of us YOUR Nancy Grace
Guarantee
that the plane carrying Barbara Olson and the others did,
indeed, hit the Pentagon.
You can't do that.
My position is, "We don't know, so we're looking
for facts."
Your position seems to be,
"The facts are in and everything is settled."
I profess my ignorance.
You profess your infallibility.
By any chance, ...do you play high stakes poker?
Comments?
back to bartcop.com
|