|
Subject: Rachel
Bart,
The idea that Rachel Madow
is "far left" because you can't find anyone
with a show
on tv to her left is the
most preposterous argument you've ever made.
It's preposterous to call a
Lefty a
Lefty?
Why are some Lefties ashamed of that label?
That's how me and my
brothers in the AFL-CIO have gotten branded as
socialists
by every right winger who
has a talk show or gets invited on one.
But, what if there were 50
unions
and your AFL-CIO was the
most Leftist?
There is no one who is "far
left" on the airwaves as far as I
know.
Certainly no one on tv.
I agree with Rachel about
what she said about Clinton.
So, our ONLY double winner is
a
Republican?
According to you, are choices
are
being losers or being Rethugs?
And if Rachel isn't Queen of the Left, why is she attacking Clinton?
Because compared to her, he's soooooooooo
far to the right?
Isn't that proof how far to the Left she is?
Oh, yeah. The discussion was
about position on the political spectrum
-- where does
"pragmatist" fall on the
spectrum? Same place as "centrist," or
"opportunist"?
Now don't go getting pissed
off on me, I just don't think you
understand the argument.
Or that tv doesn't even try
to offer the full spectrum.
Love,
Pipe
It just KILLS me that the
Clintons
gave us the blueprint for continued success
and we peed on them, belittled them and helped the GOP lynch them.
Oh, and thern we labled them "racists" for history's sake.
Got a mirror?
What if more than half the GOP currently labeled Reagan, "a Lefty faggot?"
But no, they don't do that to their heroes.
Back to Bartcop.com
Send
e-mail
to Bart
|