|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |
Subject: Obama vs Hillary
Hi Bart
I've been on the fence because both of them would
make a fine candidate.
I am with you 100% in your admiration and touting
of the Clinton campaign machine
-- it whacked the Repubs right upside the head
twice in a row; in fact, I supported
Hillary because of this very fact.
But I've changed my thinking now that McCain is
the presumptive Repug nominee.
I think you misunderestimate the hatred of McCain
by the wingnuts. They hate him
so bad that they would never, ever, ever, vote
for him, UNLESS the person he was
facing in the campaign was named Clinton, who
is like the Antichrist to these people.
You could be right, but the Fascist dogs have
never before had the possibility of
being "ruled
by a nigger," which are their words, not
mine - that's what they'll say
and I'm sure because they say it constantly around
me because I'm white.
They WILL come out to vote against Hillary, en
masse. The Repugs need this crazy
Christian vote to win, and if McCain is the nominee,
they lose most if not all of those
people, UNLESS they're running against Hillary.
How do you square that with our last two losses?
Both times we had smart, decent
military men, each with great records and impeccable
credentials, but then the GOP
slime machine swooped in and gave them a shit
makeover. Our candidate can be
Jesus Christ himself, and unless he fights like
a pitbull on meth, the GOP slime machine
will destroy him in voter's eyes and we'll lose
a third time and then what - plan for 2012?
The facts are the facts: A Clinton on the ticket
= 2 wins. No Clinton = no wins.
I'm in the mood to win - how about you?
Barack lacks the baggage.
No, all we can say is the whore media has refused
to look at his past.
He might have real problems - we won't know until
he becomes our champion.
On the other side, you think there's some Clinton
secret that they're holding back?
Sure, he'll get swiftboated,
but, c'mon, all the Dems have to do is run pictures of
McCain smelling W's armpit and saying that we
needed to stay in Iraq "100 years",
and they could run Ronald McDonald and win.
If it's a choice between Barack
and the same-old-white-guy from the Repubs, Dems
win big, unstealable-big.
Keep swingin' that hammer, Bart, and stay outta
the ice,
Rev. Jim
Preachin' the Gospel Truth in Suth'n Il'noyg
Rev Jim, you seem to be saying we can't lose with Obama.
I wish I shared your certainty.
Send e-mail
to Bart | Discuss
it on The BartCop Forum | Comment
on it at the BartBlog