"We love and trust our Dubya!"
Bart, you clearly seem to have a lack of RELIABLE information.
That's part of the problem.
Our government is lying to us so we can't get
any straight facts.
While "Al Qaida" may have a whole lot of really
ignorant Islamic
extremists functioning in its lower ranks, who's
really in charge?
My money is on Bush's partner Osama.
Usama bin Laden was a CIA employee long before he became the figurehead of "Al Qaida."
I believe that's true.
It HAS ALREADY been admitted by our own government
THAT IT REALLY
DOESN'T KNOW who commandeered those "hijacked"
planes on 9-11.
I don't believe that's true.
Can you provide a link?
With the great pleathora of surveillance equipment
THAT WAS ALREADY in place in America's
airports -- especially in the Northeast -- when
9-11 happened, there has NEVER been produced
ANY pictures or video of these alleged "ragheads"
getting on any of those "hijacked" aircraft.
Sure there is - I've seen pictures of Atta walking
down the boarding tunnel in Boston.
Even while vehemently declaring the Bush regime
and its co-conspiring federal bureaucracy a
flagrant bunch of liars, you yet continue to
buy into THEIR version of the 9-11 dog-and-pony show
about how it fundamentally happened.
What's up?
Dan
Since I can't verify anything, I have to trust
people like Clinton.
He said the minute the plane hit the towers,
he knew it was either Iran or Osama.
Then he figured it was Osama because Iran was
just too glassable.
And Dan, I don't mean this as an attack, but sending
someone a dozen links is NOT an argument.
That's maybe the biggest problem I have with
you conspiracy buffs.
If YOU
can't make the argument, then you have no argument to make.
People write every day saying "get
real" and then they list a dozen or a
hundred links.
That's why nobody can make any headway on convincing
people - there's no "there" there.
People claim I'm gullible, ignorant and "Bush's
willing tool," then, instead of straightening
me out,
point to some other guy (the links) and tell
me how clear and obvious things are to everyone.
If YOU
can't make the argument, then you have no argument to make.
Plus, you conspiracy buffs often use "funny" math.
When I was out west, I saw a TV show where the
guy was saying things like,
"Everybody knows Boeing can fly an
empty plane from their home office."
That may be true, but it does NOT add up to, "the 9-11 planes were empty."
One of the best things the cover-up has going for it is the psycho conspiracy sites.
Many of them are so wild they resemble comedy
sites. They don't say, "This may
have happened,"
or "We believe
this happened," no, they say,
"This happened," and when pressed
for proof
they have to back down and the BFEE gets to claim
victory - that's bad bluffing.
Again, I don't mean to attack you and I
don't mean to put words in your mouth.
This has been on my mind a long time and you
provided a bridge to get that out.
Most of all, we have to blame the pink tutu Democrats.
They have the power to call Bush on his crimes
and cover-ups but they're too afraid.
"We
love and trust our Dubya!"
http://www.commondreams.org/views04/0122-10.htm
http://216.26.163.62/2002/me_terrorism_10_16.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osama_dead.html
http://www.sianews.com/modules.php?name=News&file=article&sid=2278&mode=&order=0&thold=0
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/osamabinladen_wmc.html
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/binladen_cia.html
http://english.pravda.ru/usa/2001/09/12/14910.html
http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2002/12/07/1038950239070.html?oneclick=true
In no way, fashion, or form could a group of Afghani
cavemen have caused
America's premier frontline military infrastructure
to "stand down" its defenses on 9-11.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/911stand.html
http://portland.indymedia.org/en/2004/03/284651.shtml
http://www.standdown.net/