Last week the National Association of Broadcasters (NAB), the radio industry's
trade group, held its convention in Philadelphia.
Here's what we learned there: Rush Limbaugh is a pussy; Sean Hannity, Limbaugh's
heir apparent, is a bully; and Clear Channel is an
evil empire--or at the very least, a greedy and inconsiderate empire.
This was last Thursday, which turned out to be a momentous day for fans of poetic justice.
It doesn't take a CPA to figure out that the right wing in this country
has been overdrawn at the karma bank since the Clinton
impeachment hypocrisy festival, or at least the 2000 presidential election
theft. Last Thursday the bill came due, and hoo boy did the
right pay through the nose.
To recap: Rush Limbaugh went down in flames, a self- immolation ignited
by his own inflammatory racial rhetoric. Word then came
that he's under investigation for his connection to a black market prescription
drug ring.
On Capitol Hill it was officially announced: No weapons of mass destruction--the
central argument for our involvement in Iraq--have
been found after six months of searching.
None.
Then Arnold, the right's beloved wolf in social liberal clothing, got hit
with two bombshells from his past: dual allegations of pinching
women's butts uninvited and singing the praises of Adolf Hitler. Ouch.
But wait. It gets better.
There's also now a full-blown Justice Department investigation into allegations
that the White House outed a CIA employee in
retaliation for her husband's criticism of our Iraqi policy--which, in
a time of war, even Ann Coulter would have to admit is
tantamount to treason.
On this one, the big fat finger of blame is being pointed at Karl Rove,
the president's Mephistophelian political adviser. When it was
revealed that Rove served as campaign adviser to John Ashcroft for a congressional
race in Missouri, even Republican Sen. Arlen
Specter called for Ashcroft to recuse himself from the proceedings, stopping
just short of calling for a special prosecutor. All of this
in just one day!
Okay, it's impolite to gloat, so let's get back to the three unassailable truths revealed at the NAB convention.
1) Rush Limbaugh is a pussy.
Before we even get started, I would like to give a "megadittoes" shout-out
to Al Franken on behalf of the silent majority in this
country. If last week's controversy, and the ensuing firestorm of condemnation
(not to mention El Rushbo's hasty retreat), proved
anything, it's this: We can all agree that Rush Limbaugh is a big fat idiot.
This is important because the right likes to discredit any
opposition by defining it as "outside of the mainstream." It became patently
obvious last week that Rush Limbaugh, the right's
chrome-plated megaphone, is outside the mainstream.
It is fitting that Philadelphia, the cradle of democracy, would serve as
ground zero for Limbaugh's comeuppance. A quick recap for
anyone in a coma last week: On a Sunday NFL pregame show on ESPN, Limbaugh
said that Donovan McNabb was overrated by the
media because they want to see a black quarterback succeed. In other words,
this was another case of what Limbaugh calls "the
compassion fascists" ruining our cigar-smokin', golf-playin' good time.
The job of quarterback is, apparently, the white man's burden
and his alone.
None of Limbaugh's fellow commentators picked up the thread, and the remark
drifted into the digital ether until local sportswriters
started hammering at it the following Tuesday. Soon the debate moved from
the local sports page to the nation's editorial pages. By
Wednesday, presidential candidates Howard Dean and Wesley Clark were calling
for Limbaugh's head on a stick, backed by a chorus
of some two dozen members of Congress. By late Wednesday night, Limbaugh
had tendered his resignation, and ESPN had gratefully
accepted it.
The very next morning Limbaugh was scheduled to deliver the keynote speech
at the NAB convention in, of all places, Philadelphia,
thus violating the cardinal law of the animal kingdom: Don't shit where
you eat.
Back in the good ol' '90s, the right used the tabloid press to plant the
seeds of some of the most outrageous allegations against the
Clintons--rape! murder! drug dealing!--knowing full well that the mainstream
press would then be obligated to look into these charges.
Even though these lurid accusations would be quickly dismissed, they would,
at the very least, remain on the national radar for a few
days. It was a cheap, thuggish tactic, and Limbaugh would often parrot
these groundless allegations on his radio show.
So it was with no small measure of schadenfreude that the left watched
Limbaugh get a taste of his own medicine. A New York Post
story hit the streets just hours after Limbaugh resigned, claiming he's
under investigation in an ongoing probe of a Florida
prescription drug ring. (Limbaugh has a mansion in Palm Beach.)
The article, citing a story the National Enquirer has apparently been sitting
on for two years, says Limbaugh's former housekeeper
had been selling him black market prescription pills, including OxyContin.
The housekeeper allegedly wore a wire and has audiotapes
of the drug transactions. Thursday, just prior to his NAB appearance, Limbaugh
issued this statement: "I am unaware of any
investigation by any authorities involving me. No governmental representative
has contacted me directly or indirectly. If my assistance
is required in the future, I will, of course, cooperate fully."
The meekness of that statement speaks volumes. That's not even a denial.
Where's the righteous indignation of somebody wrongly
smeared? Where's the vehement declaration of innocence? Last Friday he
said the following on his radio program: "I really don't
know the full scope of what I am dealing with. And when I get all the facts,
when I get all the details of this, rest assured that I will
discuss it with you and tell you how it is, tell you everything there is,
maybe more than you want to know about this."
Huh?
So Limbaugh came out to address the convention. He's not quite as fat an
idiot as he used to be, more of a pleasantly plump idiot than
a morbidly obese idiot.
In all fairness, he wasn't even that much of an idiot. He mostly used that
pompous baritone of his to talk about his rags-to-riches rise
to the top of the talk radio heap and the ways the fat cats in attendance
could make more money with it ("raise your rates!").
A half-hour into his speech, he addressed the controversy. He never quite
apologized, although he did say, "I don't mean it to hurt
anybody ... to be diminishing of anybody." Even his half-assed apologia
came in code words.
For the record, "anybody" translates in plainspoken English to "black people."
Even though there was a kernel of truth in Limbaugh's
sputtering defense, that he was denigrating the media and not black people--yet
somehow he managed to denigrate both--he's had this
beatdown coming for a long time.
He has long made race-baiting a centerpiece of his radio rants. Fairness
and Accuracy in Reporting, a media watchdog, has kept a
dossier on Limbaugh's on-air comments. In addition to playing the "Movin'
on Up" theme from The Jeffersons TV show every time he
discusses Carol Moseley Braun, or pointing out to his listeners that most
police sketches of criminals look suspiciously like Jesse
Jackson, the absolute nadir has to be this beauty: "The NAACP should have
riot rehearsal. They should get a liquor store and practice
robberies."
Reporters were told they could submit questions in writing to Limbaugh
beforehand and he would answer them at the conclusion of his
comments. Never happened. Just like his radio show--where callers are prescreened
to avoid dissent or confrontation or, God forbid,
honest and open debate--the dialogue was one-sided: Rush talks, we listen.
End of story. The minute anyone calls him on his bullshit,
he runs. That's because ... Rush Limbaugh is a big pussy.
2) Sean Hannity, Limbaugh's heir apparent, is a bully.
Hannity, half of the Hannity and Colmes show on the Fox News channel, was
the golden boy at NAB. Hannity, who has a radio show on
1210-AM, won the NAB's award for Personality of the Year, further proof
of how devoid of personality radio has become.
Hannity is the right's new attack dog, baring his teeth and mauling liberals
while barking out neo-conservative dogma. He is, like many
of his ilk, a pathological Clinton hater with a bizarre fixation on homosexuals.
(His best-selling book, Let Freedom Ring, even includes
a graphic description of fisting.) He's a master of the I-know-you-are-but-what-am-I
style of debate, doling out nuanced political
insights, such as, "They tell us that fuel-burning SUVs are bad for America,
but flag-burning SOBs aren't."
Hannity and Colmes was taped last Thursday before a live audience at the
Forrest Theatre. For some reason, the Fox publicist thought
I would get a kick out of the show and print nice things. She got that
half right. I have seen puppet shows with more intellectual
heft--a fair comparison because Hannity and Colmes is a puppet show. It's
Fox's version of CNN's Crossfire, except the deck is
hopelessly stacked against Colmes, the resident liberal milquetoast.
Hannity is virile and ruggedly handsome in a football team captain sort
of way. Colmes, meanwhile, exudes impotence. He looks like a
weasel and acts like a scared rabbit. And from where I was sitting the
second row, he looked like he was wearing, swear to God,
lipstick.
Colmes was the first to come out onstage. The announcer introduced him
by asking the audience if they had an "Alan Colme-over." The
audience booed. Then came Hannity, whose entrance line was "Who's been
Hannitized?" Thunderous applause and cheers. The guests
were Ed Rendell, who got booed and never got a word in edge-wise, and Bill
Bennett, who has turned a failed tenure as drug czar
under Bush the elder into a lucrative speaking-circuit career as moralistic
scold.
However, Bennett was recently exposed as a big fat hypocrite when it was
revealed that he has a major gambling addiction--by his
own admission, six-figure losses in casinos from Atlantic City to Las Vegas.
Bennett's Bible is apparently missing the page where Jesus
says, "Let he who is without sin cast the first stone."
At one point Hannity stood up for Limbaugh, saying, "We need more debate,
not less." But when an audience member seated onstage
spoke out during a break, he was quietly escorted off the stage. (I caught
up with him later. His name is Kenneth Montgomery Locke, a
regular Hannity and Colmes watcher. He drove 800 miles from North Carolina
after Colmes sent him tickets. He says he was told that
"this is not the forum for you to speak your political ideas" before being
shown the door.)
The show ended with a few softball questions from the audience, culminating
with this exchange with a cute little boy who asked: "Do
you think we'll find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq?"
Colmes: "I hope we do. I want to believe the reasons we were given for going to war."
Hannity: "We know they're there. We will find them. Let not your heart be troubled."
Crowd went wild. Roll credits.
The Fox publicist allowed me five minutes of carefully supervised questions
with Hannity at the post-taping party at the Palm. It
didn't go well.
PW [semi-seriously]: "I have to warn you. My paper is screamingly liberal ... "
Hannity [utterly serious]: "That's your problem!"
PW: "Good one, Sean. Care to comment on the Al Franken lawsuit?"
Hannity: "No."
PW: "How about the Limbaugh controversy?"
Hannity: "I'm not going to talk about that. Rush is my friend. There should
be more debate, not less. He should be on that show next
Sunday defending his position."
PW: "Why isn't he? It seems like he's running away."
Hannity: [If looks could kill ... ]
PW: "Do you favor a special prosecutor to look into who leaked the identity of the CIA agent?"
Hannity: "No."
PW: "You mean that a special prosecutor was warranted to find out if the
president got a blow job from an intern but one is not
necessary to find out if somebody in the White House revealed the identity
of a CIA agent during a time of war, which is tantamount
to treason?"
Publicist: "Okay, that's enough. Don't you have any questions about Philadelphia?"
3) Clear Channel is an evil empire. Or at the very least a greedy and inconsiderate empire.
Following Limbaugh's keynote speech, the NAB hosted a "super-session" with
the heads of two of the biggest radio chains in the
business--John Hogan, president and COO of Clear Channel, and Joel Hollander,
president and COO of Infinity Broadcasting--along
with bigwigs from a few smaller radio groups.
The "super session" was hosted by none other than Sean Hannity, whose radio
show supposedly reaches 10 million listeners. The
convention's program guide billed this as a "must-attend" event. And so
I did.
The dialogue was largely self-congratulatory, with the consensus among
the executives being that monopolization is a good thing and
listeners have more variety on the airwaves than ever. The only criticism
the executives had for each other was that they have not
done a good enough job explaining to the public all the good and charitable
things they do.
After an hour of patting each other on the back--and Hannity's unctuous
mugging and shameless ass-kissing--they took audience
questions. There were several hundred in attendance--mostly anyone who's
anyone in radio management. The litany of complaints
about Clear Channel's monopolistic practices is no doubt well-known to
anyone who has bothered to read this far.
Clear Channel haters aren't just the listeners and musicians who blame
the radio group for the fact that radio sucks. There's also a lot
of anger within the industry, from competitors bushwhacked by what they
consider unfair trade practices, from people who lost their
jobs as a result of the recent flurry of mergers and acquisitions, and
from the many who chafe under the media giant's oppressive
corporate yoke. But nobody in the room would dare stand up and say as much.
Certainly not anyone banking on a future in radio.
Nobody, that is, except one man who had nothing left to lose, who was mad
as hell and not going to take it anymore, who had the
courage to stand up and say the emperor has no clothes. His name is Pat
Clawson, a 30-year broadcast veteran who worked for NBC
and CNN, and spent seven years as Washington bureau chief for the industry
bible, Radio and Records. In short, he knows the
business.
Despite Hannity's repeated attempts to silence him, Clawson dressed down
Clear Channel's Hogan something fierce for shirking
radio's obligation to serve the public interest, concluding with, "I'm
going to tell you straight to your face, sir: You people are utterly
shameless."
Hogan refused to address Clawson's remarks in front of the audience, saying
he'd be happy to discuss it in person, which he did, sort
of. After the "super session," Hogan came out with couple of his PR flacks,
and he and Clawson went off and had a brief private
conversation. I tried to eavesdrop, but all I could hear was one of the
Clear Channel flacks say to the other: "We should be on
standby in case he wants to pass this off. John's attention span is 40
seconds."
After a few minutes of what looked like a heated exchange, Hogan started
to walk away. Clawson tried to shake his hand. Hogan
refused.
Asked if Hogan addressed his grievances, Clawson said, "No. He just told
me I shouldn't have challenged him in front of all these
people." He shrugged. "Look, I've been in broadcasting for 30 years, and
I know bullshit when I smell it, and all I was hearing here
and smelling was bullshit coming off the stage."
Having covered the economics of radio for three decades, Clawson said he
has a pretty good understanding of how things got to this
point. When Congress passed the Telecommunications Act in 1996, for all
practical purposes it lifted the limits on the number of
stations that a single company could own. Clear Channel was quick to take
advantage.
"They had the capital, and frankly they did what any smart businessman
would do--aggressively expand," Clawson said. "There's
nothing wrong with that--it's the American way. But it's disingenuous for
Clear Channel or Infinity to say that there are still 3,000
owners in the radio market. In the top 50 markets, which is what national
advertisers look at, it's been consolidated down to two or
three major players. What Clear Channel has done--and this is not any evil
plan--is buy up oceanfront property in the top 50 markets,
giving them a hammerlock position for revenue."
Clawson said the consequences for the public have been dramatic because
of the drastic reduction in locally originated broadcasting
coming out of these communities. It caused news departments to shut down
and local talk radio to disappear, replaced by a syndicated
product that has little to do with local issues.
"Clear Channel has been at the forefront of that," Clawson said. "That
doesn't make Clear Channel an evil company. They're simply
taking advantage of the regulatory opportunities afforded them. But I believe
broadcasters have an obligation to serve the public
interest. The airwaves belong to the people. [Clear Channel and Infinity]
simply rent them for a period of time."
Clawson then mentioned a meeting he attended the day before for three hours--one
filled with the major radio group owners, the
major bankers and the major investors. "All I heard," he says, "was discussion
about cash flow, station-trading multiples [the price of
a station divided by its annual cash flow] and financing terms. Never once
in three hours was the phrase 'public interest' mentioned."
back to bartcop.com