Did Daddy Rush Plagiarize T.R.
Fehrenbach?
By Timothy Noah
Originally
from
Chatterbox earlier questioned whether the urban legend about
the fates of the signers of the Declaration of
Independence--whose publication-without-attribution by
Boston Globe columnist Jeff Jacoby led to Jacoby's
suspension--passed from radio's Paul Harvey (who published
it in a 1956 book) to Rush Limbaugh Jr. (father of radio's
Rush Limbaugh III), or from Limbaugh to Harvey. (Click here
and here and here to read Chatterbox's previous entries about
this.) But that now appears to have been the wrong question.
Jim Elbrecht, who maintains the Signer's Index Web page
(which is dedicated to tracking down every version of the
legend), has been pursuing a new angle focused on T.R.
Fehrenbach, author of the much-admired Texas history Lone
Star. (Fehrenbach is now a columnist for the San Antonio
Express-News.) It seems that a 1965 magazine article by
Fehrenbach about the fate of the signers was recycled into the
Congressional Record on June 30 by Sen. Strom Thurmond,
"as a reminder of the sacrifices made for our freedom."
Having surveyed Fehrenbach's text (and also a book
Fehrenbach originally published in 1968 titled Greatness To
Spare, which Elbrecht says contains most of what's in the
article), Elbrecht concludes that about 60 percent of it is
identical to Daddy Rush's version!
Did Daddy Rush swipe from Fehrenbach, or did Fehrenbach
swipe from Daddy Rush? Fehrenbach says in no uncertain
terms: "I did not take anything from Rush Limbaugh [III], and
I never heard of his father. ... As far as Paul Harvey, the same
way. I didn't listen to Paul Harvey in them days." Fehrenbach
says that when his 1965 article was published in American
Legion magazine, the editors were swamped with requests
for reprints. "Some student somewhere in Missouri plagiarized
whole sections," he recalls, "and won a prize with it."
Fehrenbach's version repeats some of the errors found in
other versions, including the destruction of Thomas Nelson's
house. (For Elbrecht's line-by-line analysis, click here.)
Chatterbox now believes that Fehrenbach and Harvey were
working off the same faulty source material, and that Daddy
Rush helped himself to Fehrenbach's article. (Fehrenbach told
Chatterbox that he didn't use anything that post-dated 1900.)
"I can't defend absolutely every fact stated," Fehrenbach says,
"but they were all sourced." He says he used "the old
insurance claim system--if it's 51 percent true, it is accepted
as true, and if it's 49 percent true and 51 percent false, I don't
use it."
Chatterbox has promised his editor he won't write about this
anymore.