 |
|
Totally |
|
|
|---|
|
American Politics Journal Atrios Barry Crimmins Betty Bowers Buzzflash Consortium News Daily Howler Daily Kos Democatic Underground Disinfotainment Today Evil GOP Bastards Faux News Channel Greg Palast The Hollywood Liberal Internet Weekly Jesus General Joe Conason Josh Marshall Liberal Oasis Make Them Accountable Mark Morford Mike Malloy Political Humor - About.com Political Wire Randi Rhodes Rude Pundit Smirking Chimp Take Back the Media Whitehouse.org More Links |
Subject: Patsy Lee Harvey Oswald
Hey BC,
About that backyard Oswald photo, I personally
believe that it's very existence
is conclusive proof of a cover-up/conspiracy.
Forget pasted-on heads and body
angles and chin shadows -- just use logic:
Why in the wide, wide world of sports would Oswald
pose for such a photo?
Even if he was planning to kill the president,
why would he go into his backyard
and have his wife take a picture of him holding
a newspaper and the rifle he planned to use?
Why would he do that?
The answer is, he wouldn't have -- no matter
whether he wanted to claim credit
for the murder, or especially if he wanted to
get away with it.
Even if Oswald wanted to take credit for JFK's
killing, what could the purpose of
such a photo possibly be? To show his grandkids?
To persuade the inevitable jury
that he is guilty of a crime he is already freely
confessing to? There is no conceivable,
logical explanation for it.
But Oswald did not want to take credit for Kennedy's
murder. While in custody,
he vehemently insisted that he was innocent,
that he was being used as a patsy.
When shown that backyard photo, he said it had
been faked.
And he had to be telling the truth. Because there's
no way he would have willingly
posed with a newspaper and the soon-to-be murder
weapon (one he planned to
leave behind him at the scene) if he hoped to
avoid a slam-dunk murder conviction.
So no matter how you look at it, there is no
logical scenario under which Oswald
would willingly pose for that photograph.
On the other hand, it is perfectly logical that
nefarious conspirators would eagerly fake
such a photo in order to make Oswald a patsy.
It is even more than logical; it is highly likely.
Ironically, the very fact that that photo exists
is sure proof that it is a fake. Had no photo
of Oswald with the rifle ever turned up, that
would be more convincing evidence that
Oswald was the killer than the photo that did
turn up is. The backyard photo exonerates
Oswald, it doesn't convict him.
The photo was faked. There's no logical way it
wasn't. And if the photo was faked,
there had to be a cover-up and a conspiracy.
You know, I wonder if one of those stars on the
wall at CIA headquarters -- the ones
representing anonymous agents who have died in
the line of duty -- might be for Lee Harvey Oswald.
By the way, the people who like your page but
don't subscribe to the radio show have
no idea what they're missing. If they did, they'd
happily fork over the paltry ten bucks
a month that I happily do. Not only does subscribing
give me a whole other aspect of
BartCop, as well as great clips, music, rants,
etc., it also makes me feel as if I'm fighting
the fascists in some small way.
For both those reasons, I promise to keep subscribing
as long as you'll promise to...
NEVER QUIT!!
Unkillable Ray