When the “war against terrorism” began, many knowledgeable people
warned that our operations in Afghanistan would turn into another
Vietnam.
In the flush of “victory”, much of the gloomy projections
have been relegated
to the trash heap.
However, there are still some interesting comparisons that can be made.
In the early days of Vietnam, the United States inserted teams
of Special Forces,
to assist in establishing good relations with the locals by helping
with village defense,
health, and education programs. These operations were highly
successful in combating
the influence of the Viet Cong. In the Afghan war, a similar,
and, like its predecessor,
highly successful program is well underway.
Like Vietnam, we are currently destroying any good will we have
with the locals
by blowing stuff up. The old saying “we had to destroy the village
in order to save it”
is alive and well and making a comeback in Afghanistan.
However, we have progressed a long way in 35 years. In Vietnam,
we would send an
infantry platoon with Zippos into a village and burn it down.
In Afghanistan, the mud
doesn’t burn, so we use precision-guided ordnance to turn peoples
homes into craters.
The downside of this “improved” system, is that by the time we
get around to blowing
up a house, a wedding party moves in and we blow up a few score
party-goers like
we did at Qalaye Niazi.
The biggest similarity between the two wars is the Pentagon briefings.
The goals
and objectives are different but the level of lies and deceits
have not changed one bit.
In Vietnam, the goal was to show progress by inflating “body
counts”. In our new,
more compassionate world, we measure progress by how many buildings
we blow up
in a sterile and non-violent manner, with “minimal collateral
damage”.In Vietnam
villages were called Viet Cong strongholds and in Afghanistan
they are called Al Qaeda
compounds. In reality, these are places which were filled with
people, who wanted
nothing more to try to scratch out a life for themselves before
we came and destroyed
everything in their pitiful lives.
The one area that is glaringly different is how the US press is
conducting operations in
the two wars. In Vietnam, the horrors and violence of war were
brought home. We saw
that people, our soldiers, their soldiers, innocent people, were
horribly maimed and killed
in war. Since Desert Storm, war for our citizens has been converted
into some sort of
sick bloodless video game. Our press today call sitting in a
pentagon briefing journalism
and don’t bother to fact check the lies they are fed by the Administration.
The India Times
has better, more accurate and more complete war coverage than
the New York Times.
This is a sad and pathetic commentary on the health of our Fourth
Estate.
Like Vietnam, one of the reasons we got involved in the first
place was to
prop up a corrupt and inept government, which we installed. In
Afghanistan, we
have installed a government, but it remains to be seen just how
corrupt and
inept it will be. Early signs, despite what is reported in the
US media, are not
particularly encouraging.
In Vietnam, the primary reason for our presence was to stop Communism.
In Afghanistan, we have traded the bogyman of Communism for terrorism.
Both were and are vile and, if you will, evil. However, neither
will be defeated
by military intervention. Economic stability, justice and self-determination
are
the keys to defeating both of those enemies.
In both Vietnam and Afghanistan, the more compelling, and less
acknowledged,
reason for intervention appears to be US business interests.
In the 60’s it was
rubber and oil. Now it’s just oil and not even really oil, just
a place to put a
pipeline that the Ruskies don’t control. We seem to have an annoying
habit of
trading red blood for black gold.
So in the end, there are quite a few similarities. We can still
avoid the bloodbath
of Vietnam. There is no reason for our military to continue the
bloodletting.
With luck and some thought, perhaps we can avoid the need to
put another
black wall on our national mall. We shall see.
Write to David Friedrich