Bart:

I have an unscientific mind.  One could argue to me, and I'd have no reason 
not to believe them, that what looks like explosions are simply bursts from the 
weight of the building collapsing on the lower floors.  Just because those "bursts" 
look like explosions, doesn't necessarily make them explosions.  What I'd like to 
see are pictures from the same time frame on WTC 7.  To me, explaining why 
WTC 7 collapsed when it wasn't struck, and wasn't burning with the aid of 
jet fuel, is the key.

But I do believe that further investigation is needed.

1.  Would members of our own government do something like this? - History has 
shown that some members would be willing (Operation Northwoods), and all that 
would be required would be permission granted by the forces that could make it 
happen.  Kennedy told plotters to go fuck themselves.  Would Bush?

2.  Could this be carried off by members inside the government, and have the 
secret kept from the public?  - Certainly. There are mercenaries with the capability 
of doing this for the right price.  And even if al Qaeda was the operational force, 
there are certainly mercenary forces with that tactical ability to show them how to 
carry it off.  Don't forget that our CIA created bin Laden as a terrorist force, and it 
was likely mercenaries with no visible links to the government who trained him and 
taught him how to train others.  It is reasonable to believe that bin Laden still would 
have some contact with those organizations.  If these "mercenaries" were to let the 
secret out, that would prevent them from ever working for any government again.

3.  Would NeoCons in the White House have access to these types of mercenaries?
- Sure, at least the ones who've spent their careers in intelligence.  As former head 
of the CIA, HW would certainly have access to groups such as this.

But, ultimately, this is a battle for scientists.  The Bushistas have shown the ability to 
discredit real science while maximizing faux science.  A congressional committee will 
have to provide a real opportunity for all scientists with a valid opinion to be heard.  
I tend to doubt such an opportunity will be given even if Democrats retake congress. 
Democrats have shown the propensity to excuse all previous Republican crimes in an 
effort to create "bi-partisanship." We saw Clinton do this with Iran/Contra - for all the 
good it did him.  We will never know the truth.  It will be kept from us, if for no other 
reason than to protect America's reputation.  I fully understand why many Democrats 
refuse to discuss this issue, because they understand that it's an argument that places 
a "tin-foil hat" on their heads if they cannot provide proof, and we are not likely going 
to see a real opportunity to gather the proof.

One added thought.  I've noticed that NeoCons have the propensity to accuse others 
of doing what they themselves are doing every day.  For instance, the "Brooks Brothers Riot" 

accused Democrats of attempting to steal the 2000 election, when they were obviously 
doing it themselves - and had a papertrail of evidence going all the way to Jeb Bush's office.  
During the run up to the invasion of Iraq, we constantly heard the refrain that "Saddam 
gassed his own people."  This is, of course, a true statement, but how hard would they 
attempt to cover up knowledge that said, "Team Bush blew up 3,000 of his own people
to con the nation into war."

Jimmy the legal beagle

 

Current Issue Back Issues About BartCop.com Members(need password) Subscribe to BartCop! Contact Us Advertise With Us BartCop: Entertainment The Forum  - bartcopforum@yahoo.com Live CHAT The Reader Bart Cook Sports Stickers Bookstore More Links Perkel's Blog Power of Nightmares Cost of Bush's greed White Rose Society Project 60 Chinaco Anejo EVEN MORE LINKS

Search Now: